Sentences with phrase «legal theory of negligence»

Most deck, porch, and railing collapse cases involve legal theories of negligence, premises liability, product liability, and construction law.

Although personal injury cases may be litigated under a variety of different legal theories, the vast majority are litigated under the legal theory of negligence.

If you have been injured in an Atlanta auto accident caused by a drunk driver, you may be able to sue the driver under the legal theory of negligence.

These cases are based upon the legal theory of negligence, so you must prove:

Alternatively, if strict liability does not apply, a dog owner may still be responsible for the acts of his or her animals under the legal theory of negligence.

Most personal injury cases are based on the legal theory of negligence, which holds parties responsible when their conduct falls below a certain standard of care and the result causes the victim to suffer injuries.

Most Florida personal injury cases are brought under the legal theory of negligence.

Premises liability cases, like most other cases brought under the legal theory of negligence, require that the plaintiff establish the defendant owed them a duty of care.

In short, the legal theory of negligence allows an injury victim to file a claim against the party who caused the injuries as a result of negligence or careless behavior.

These lawsuits are based on the legal theory of negligence.

The vast majority of Birmingham personal injury cases are litigated under the legal theory of negligence.

Most damage claims related to an accident rely on the legal theory of negligence.

Premises liability is based on the legal theory of negligence: Breach of the hotel's duty constitutes negligence.

Plaintiffs in truck accident litigation usually pursue relief under the legal theory of negligence.