Sentences with phrase «legal web publishing»

Like «em or not, PDFs will be part legal web publishing for at least another five years.

Not exact matches

A majority of Canadian courts do not publish their decisions on their web site, in part due to the fact that court decisions are routinely screened, commented upon in the form of headnotes and made available to members of the legal profession by commercial publishers.
Working in conjunction with the Massachusetts court system, the project will publish the daily docket on the web and build a knowledge wiki for the public with common legal terms.
But while the official law school Web site shows no evidence of the controversy surrounding Mukasey's visit, the law student blog Eagleionline yesterday published a draft of an upcoming article by BC Law Prof. Daniel Kanstroom, «On «Waterboarding»: Legal Interpretation and the Continuing Struggle for Human Rights.»
Two of the e-mails I received warrant mention, because they are both from people who have been active in publishing online for the legal community since the earliest days of the Web and who are both highly regarded for their work.
Apple Wins Legal Dispute Over Published Trade Secrets Apple Suit Pits Web Reporters Against Trade Secret Protections
Blawg Review # 159 includes interesting picks such as the greatest pro defense decisions from the Drug and Device Law Blog and this update from Lowering the Bar on a brewing copyright battle between the state of Oregon and some of the legal Web sites that publish its statutes online for free.
I also want to acknowledge Law.com Executive Editor David Snow, who gave me the freedom and encouragement to blog on whatever I wanted; Law.com Vice President Jill Windwer, whose vision and hard work have made Law.com a leading destination for legal professionals on the Web; Jennifer Collins, the former Law.com editor who first invited me here; and ALM CEO Bill Pollak, one of the few corporate leaders in publishing or in any industry who truly gets social media.
Stem Legal has long been publishing regular roundups of client news over at our Law Firm Web Strategy Blog, and it's time we do the same for company news.
It also announced that one print publication — the consumer - oriented Exhibit A — would now be published only on the Web and another — the national legal newspaper LawyersUSA — would reduce its print frequency in favor of enhanced Web content.
Reproduced below is a short list of 10 legibility guidelines published by Tim Ash, a landing page expert, in an article on SearchEngineWatch, that legal marketers should follow when designing and publishing web pages, blog posts and email communications (our additional comments are in italics in brackets):
[cross-posted at Slaw.ca] If you've been paying any attention at all to the zeitgeist of legal web marketing the last couple years, you know that producing and publishing content is the best possible way to grow your online reputation.
I had just published the first edition of my book, The Essential Guide to the Best (and Worst) Legal Sites on the Web, and saw blogging as a -LSB-...]
Steve Matthews is the President and Founder of Stem Legal Web Enterprises, a web development, publishing and strategy company for the legal profesLegal Web Enterprises, a web development, publishing and strategy company for the legal professiWeb Enterprises, a web development, publishing and strategy company for the legal professiweb development, publishing and strategy company for the legal profeslegal profession.
analytics & ari kaplan & ari kaplan advisors & Blog & branding & cloud & cloud computing & content generation & digital marketing & getting published & ghostwriter & ghostwriting & innovation & law firm & law firm profitability & law practice management & law - related & lawyers & legal ghostwriter & legal industry & legal management & legal practice & Legal Technology & leveraging technology & marketing & reinventing professional services & Reinvention & seo & small law firms & web design & wrlegal ghostwriter & legal industry & legal management & legal practice & Legal Technology & leveraging technology & marketing & reinventing professional services & Reinvention & seo & small law firms & web design & wrlegal industry & legal management & legal practice & Legal Technology & leveraging technology & marketing & reinventing professional services & Reinvention & seo & small law firms & web design & wrlegal management & legal practice & Legal Technology & leveraging technology & marketing & reinventing professional services & Reinvention & seo & small law firms & web design & wrlegal practice & Legal Technology & leveraging technology & marketing & reinventing professional services & Reinvention & seo & small law firms & web design & wrLegal Technology & leveraging technology & marketing & reinventing professional services & Reinvention & seo & small law firms & web design & writing
I started it back in 2002, partly as a way of providing updates to the book I'd published back then, The Essential Guide to the Best (and Worst) Legal Sites on the Web.
At the same time, Jaffe published a white paper on Web 2.0 and legal PR, Web 2.0 and PR 2.0, and unveiled a wiki, which is as yet without content.
The spring 2003 Journal of Appellate Practice and Process has published an informative overview of legal Web logs, Legal and Appellate Weblogs: What They Are, Why You Should Read Them, and Why You Should Consider Starting Yourlegal Web logs, Legal and Appellate Weblogs: What They Are, Why You Should Read Them, and Why You Should Consider Starting YourLegal and Appellate Weblogs: What They Are, Why You Should Read Them, and Why You Should Consider Starting Your Own.
One of the best analyses I have seen of Web logs as legal - marketing tools is Web Logs for Lawyers: Lessons from Ernie the Attorney, written by the esteemed Jerry Lawson and published on LLRX.com.
Finally finished writing the second edition of my book, The Essential Guide to the Best (and Worst) Legal Sites on the Web, to be published by ALM Publishing.
Law Technology News has published the second in my three - part series on Web 2.0 sites of interest to legal professionals: Web Watch: The Web 2.0 Tour.
I had just published the first edition of my book, The Essential Guide to the Best (and Worst) Legal Sites on the Web, and saw blogging as a way to keep myself and my readers up to date.
My last column addressed an odd feature of current legal periodical publishing: a number of legal publishers do not expose interoperable metadata for their periodical articles on the free Web, and do not sell or license individual periodical articles online.
Publishing online legal content, while a critically important piece of an effective web strategy, will only take you so far.
It happened once before — a decade ago when lawyers first began to publish legal information on the Web — and it is happening again now with the spread of legal blogs, says Kevin O'Keefe at LexBlog Blog:
Dawn Urquhart drew subscribers» attention to a National Post — Legal Post article published on the web yesterday, «Court decisions may be lost in translation.»
While definitely not immune, lawyers who web - publish to promote their legal services are often in direct control of the content most frequently accessed about them.
If you've been paying any attention at all to the zeitgeist of legal web marketing the last couple years, you know that producing and publishing content is the best possible way to grow your online reputation.
Nick Holmes, author of the U.K. blog binary law, together with legal technology consultant Delia Venables, has just published two books on technology and Web tools for lawyers.
«We must determine how to prioritize, collect, archive, preserve, and ensure reliable long - term access to the burgeoning amount of legal scholarship being published through new, informal channels on the Web
Libraries participating in the project share costs, resources, and expertise to preserve important Web - published, legal materials within a shared digital archive.
«Schlichtmann published the statements on his Web site... not as a member of the public who had been injured by these alleged practices, but as an attorney advertising his legal services.
Andrew Sharp is a Content Manager at Illinois Legal Aid Online, where he helps oversee the legal information ILAO publishes on theLegal Aid Online, where he helps oversee the legal information ILAO publishes on thelegal information ILAO publishes on the web.
There is a difference between a «software publisher» which publishes and distributes legal self - help software applications and a Web Site that offers legal document preparation services which involve a person reviewing the document or legal form for errors and omissions.
Even though the guidelines were published 9 years ago, they have stood the test of time and are common sense rules to guide non-lawyer users on how to evaluate the quality of a legal information web site.
SmartLegalForms, Inc., publishes over 35 highly specific legal document and legal information web sites, either directly or on behalf of clients, and serves over 100,000 users a month.
TAGS: Law practice technology; Legal informatics blogs; Legal publishing; Web 2.0 and law; Social media and law.
Steve Matthews is the Founder of Stem Legal Web Enterprises, a web development, publishing and strategy company for the legal profesLegal Web Enterprises, a web development, publishing and strategy company for the legal professiWeb Enterprises, a web development, publishing and strategy company for the legal professiweb development, publishing and strategy company for the legal profeslegal profession.
The Chesapeake Project was launched in 2007 by the Georgetown University Law Library and the State Law Libraries of Maryland and Virginia as a collaborative digital archive for the preservation of important Web - published legal materials, which often disappear as Web site content is rearranged or deleted over time.
The Chesapeake Project Legal Information Archive has completed its third annual analysis of link rot among the original URLs for law - and policy - related materials published to the Web and archived though the Chesapeake Project.
The Project is an initiative of the Georgetown University Law Library and the State Law Libraries of Maryland and Virginia and is a digital archive for the preservation of important Web - published legal materials.
TAGS: Legal social networks; Legal social media; Lawyers» social networks; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Patent law information systems; Patent application information systems; Patent examination systems; Patent social networks; Patent social media; Patent prior art information systems; Patent crowdsourcing systems; Legal crowdsourcing systems.
TAGS: Legal blogs; Legal social networks; Legal social media; Lawyers» social networks; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law.
TAGS: Legal social networks; Legal social media; Lawyers» social networks; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Web 2.0 and law.
TAGS: Legal social networks; Legal social media; Lawyers» social networks; Lawyer referral services; Lawyer directories; Rainmaking tools; Legal client information systems; Lawyer finding tools; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Class action information systems; Class action social networks; Class action social media; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal social networks; Legal social media; Lawyers» social networks; Lawyer referral services; Lawyer directories; Rainmaking tools; Legal client information systems; Lawyer finding tools; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Class action information systems; Class action social networks; Class action social media; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal social media; Lawyers» social networks; Lawyer referral services; Lawyer directories; Rainmaking tools; Legal client information systems; Lawyer finding tools; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Class action information systems; Class action social networks; Class action social media; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal client information systems; Lawyer finding tools; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Class action information systems; Class action social networks; Class action social media; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Class action information systems; Class action social networks; Class action social media; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Class action information systems; Class action social networks; Class action social media; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Class action information systems; Class action social networks; Class action social media; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Class action information systems; Class action social networks; Class action social media; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Class action information systems; Class action social networks; Class action social media; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and clilegal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and clients.
TAGS: Legal social networks; Legal social media; Lawyers» social networks; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Litigation papers information systems; Litigation papers databases; Pleadings information systems; Pleadings databases; Motions information systems; Motions databases; Briefs information systems; Briefs databases; Brief banks; Legal document sharing systems; Legal document databases; Litigation document sharing systems; Litigation document databases.
Mark Rosch, co-author of «The Cybersleuth's Guide to the Internet» and 6 ABA - published books including the recent «Google Gmail and Calendar in One Hour for Lawyers», helps legal professionals navigate the free and low - cost sources on the Web to meet their due diligence requirements for investigative and background research.
TAGS: Legal social networks; Legal social media; Lawyers» social networks; Lawyers» rating systems; Lawyer rating systems; Clients» information systems; Clients» legal social networks; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal social networks; Legal social media; Lawyers» social networks; Lawyers» rating systems; Lawyer rating systems; Clients» information systems; Clients» legal social networks; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal social media; Lawyers» social networks; Lawyers» rating systems; Lawyer rating systems; Clients» information systems; Clients» legal social networks; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and clilegal social networks; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law; Legal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and cliLegal directories; Online legal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and clilegal directories; Lawyers» directories; Online lawyers» directories; Systems that match lawyers and clients.
TAGS: Legal social networks; Legal social media; Law librarians» social networks; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law.
TAGS: Legal social networks; Legal social media; Lawyers» social networks; African - American lawyers» social networks; Corporate lawyers» social networks; General counsel's social networks; Legal publishing; Legal publishers; Legal self - publishing; Legal communication; Legal information sharing; Web 2.0 and law.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z