The scholarship retreat will provide a fixed space and dedicated time
for legal writing professors to devote themselves to focused and intensive scholarly writing, away from regular professional and personal commitments.
Plus, once an article is accepted for publication, it goes through an intensive substantive review by one or more editorial board members and a technical review by several
legal writing professors who volunteer as assistant editors.
This Bibliography seeks to
supply legal writing professors, students, judicial law clerks, and judges with a list of resources that will be helpful for both opinion writing and for those preparing to work with or write for judges.
Remediating in Teams by Lindsey P. Gustafson * In his foreword to the first issue of The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute, Chris Rideout asked a series of broad questions that continue to
engage legal writing professors: How do we teach legal writing when there is disparity in our students» writing proficiency?
Then again, anyone who thinks a few tips and checklists from a free app will make him a better writer may be beyond help: The app, which was developed by
legal writing professor Kathy Vinson of Suffolk University Law School, is described on Suffolk's website as «an app designed to help legal writers improve their -LSB-...]
«
Many legal writing professors resist teaching the memo or brief problem directly, out of fear that they will give away too much or that the students will fail to try to do their own work on the problem.»
In the letter, Rangappa stated that she «did not intend for my post to cast doubt on the important role and valuable contributions of
legal writing professors in legal education.»
Within a few days,
legal writing professors Amy Vorenberg, Kris Tiscione and Lisa McElroy shot a letter — co-signed by nearly 450 supporters — to the dean of Yale Law School and the Yale admissions committee.
The article begins with a brief survey of the various ways that
legal writing professors use non-legal examples and then situates them within the larger context of learning theory and the emerging field of positive psychology.
«A forum for news and discussion between and among law professors who teach legal skills (
including legal writing professors, clinicians and «doctrinal» professors who incorporate practical skills into their courses), practitioners who hire the students we teach, and students themselves who are interested in keeping abreast of trends in legal skills training.»
Etta has worked with various law offices in the Lowcountry, taught as an
adjunct legal writing professor at the Charleston School of Law, and even started her own small firm in 2012, performing contract work for local attorneys and writing for the National Association of Independent Schools.
Chicago - Kent's legal writing program is a hybrid program that combines long -
term legal writing professors with visiting assistant professors («VAPs»), professors who ultimately seek a tenure - track position at another law school and are at Chicago - Kent for 1 - 4 years.
We are one of only a few law schools in the country with full - time, tenured and tenure -
track legal writing professors who are involved in service and scholarship in the national legal writing community.
Annotated Bibliography Introduction This Bibliography seeks to
supply legal writing professors, students, judicial law clerks, and judges with a list of resources that will be helpful for both opinion writing and for those preparing to work with or write for judges.
In his foreword to the first issue of The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute, Chris Rideout asked a series of broad questions that continue to
engage legal writing professors: How do we teach legal writing when there is disparity in our students» writing proficiency?
The app, which was developed by
legal writing professor Kathy Vinson of Suffolk University Law School, is described on Suffolk's website as «an app designed to help legal writers improve their writing skills.
The Legal Writing Prof Blog noted on August 15, 2012, that
the legal writing professors» listserv was quickly «abuzz,» as LRW instructors found the post