Legislating morality so rarely is.
Because
legislating morality (spay / neuter laws) doesn't work.
That makes it really hard to move on emotionally, and it seems like the state is
legislating morality in this instance (especially when you consider how comparatively easy it is to get married).
Legislating morality has not worked and will not work.
Conversely, those that are against
legislating morality are for legislating other behaviors.
It seem like a thinly veiled attempt at
legislating morality through health insurance.
I have always blieved
that legislating morality is a bad idea.
Legislating morality or legislating any pro or con stance to morality will never work.
That legislating morality works
ElGiblet — well, maybe if religious people didn't try to
legislate morality and force their religion on others, they wouldn't have to try to convince you that your religion is foolish.
Somewhere along the line religions need to realize you CAN NOT
legislate morality.
As far as what makes sense, our government
legislates morality every time it makes a rule.
Yet, militant right - wing Christians, in a most uncharitable and un-Christian manner are working through the ignorant Tea Party and narrow - mnided GOP party to try and
legislate morality and take away others» freedoms who do not believe as they do.
It's at this point I'd say that you can't
legislate morality but is the result of knowing Father.
Quit trying to
legislate morality and use your Godly gifts to improve the world and eliminate unwanted pregnancies before they happen.
It's sad to see a pillar of US history trying to
legislate morality after failing to convert people's hearts and minds over a lifetime.
I hate people who claim to support small government, but who at the same time try to
legislate morality.
We the church have dropped the ball, we can not
legislate morality, if it does not begin early in a person's life then it is less likely to manifest itself later in life.
Every law
legislates morality.
Some people think they are debating whether a life is preserved, but the fact is, you can't
legislate morality or behavior.
And excusing people for their false beliefs that they force upon others by attempting to
legislate morality because they are a majority is righteous how?
@Reality — looks like you're trying to
legislate morality?
The objection arises, Why should the state
legislate morality?
It's insane how often the same people that want to
legislate morality (i.e. forbid gay marriage, abortion, pot) are the same against legislating other behaviors (i.e. what size soda you can sell, Obamacare).
But trying to
legislate your morality is idiotic and essentially impractical.
Last week our nation commemorated the eightieth anniversary of the repeal of Prohibition, the most commonly cited lesson of which is: You can not
legislate morality.
You can not
legislate morality unless you want to violate freedom of thought and give us all lobotomies or brainwash everyone.
All those laws do not
legislate morality.
Do not oppress —
legislated morality.
Do not kill —
legislated morality.
You can not
legislate morality or religious values — all that you end up doing is oppressing the people instead of promoting liberty.
No, they're strapping Bibles to their chests and trying to
legislate their morality into places where it doesn't belong.
They want government to act on behalf of the individual and
legislate morality.
it isn't the governments job to
legislate morality or many other things.
I never thought that Pat Robertson would ever realize that you can't
legislate morality.
The Family Research Council are propagandists of the worst sort who resort to fear mongering to push forward their agenda to
legislate morality.
The same leftist buffoons who shout «you can't
legislate morality» to keep abortions available probably think they are good Christians (the ones who aren't Atheists).
To glazed eyes, Heastie trotted out the same old yada - yada: Can't
legislate morality, can't judge the barrel by a few bad apples (quite a few now), can blame negative media, etc..
Earlier this year he said his administration had «proposed every ethics law imaginable» and «you can't
legislate morality and you can't legislate intelligence.»
I'm not sure how changing the law would provide moral clarity since we are often reminded that you can't
legislate morality.
Is it possible, or desirable, to
legislate morality?
People are fond of claiming that you can't
legislate morality, but that apparently depends on whose morality.
(Wait, we can't
legislate morality?
I thought that in Canada, particularly since the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, we are reluctant to
legislate morality, about which many legitimately disagree, particularly using the criminal law.
The chief justice took it as given that Parliament is entitled to
legislate morality using the criminal law.
It's often said that one can pass laws, but one can't
legislate morality.
Not exact matches
Although the religious communities of Judaism and Christianity can not
legislate this minimal human
morality (indeed, when they attempt to do so they most often retard its social impact, especially in a democratic setting), they can provide it with an overall ontological context, a continuing vision of its original grounds and its ultimate horizon.
Please tell all your religious brethren as well to follow your example of not trying to
legislate your religiously held
morality and let secular society work uncontrained free of the current blue laws and religious litmus tests it now supports.
We must
legislate biblical
morality by adopting the Christian Amendment.
One can not
legislate one's own version of
morality.