Sentences with phrase «legitimate actions of other»

This mirrors the legitimate actions of other investment companies.

Not exact matches

«Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.»

Thus there is a legitimate (and in itself higher) principle of freedom and also a legitimate (though in itself lower) principle of justified compulsion, and these two principles can not be simply assigned to separate spheres of human existence and action so that they could never come into conflict with each other.

Religion is the power of man over man where no legitimate basis for that power otherwise exists — how else do you explain so many killing and dying for the the «beliefs» of others who lead them to such actions?

«Believing... that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their Legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.»

It wouldn't be the effect, however, but the necessary precondition - if Parliament's will is unified and recognized as legitimate, the monarch can't legitimately refuse assent (or take other such actions), because they wouldn't be acting in accordance with the requirements of the office.

Therefore, as vigorously as we endorse and celebrate the use of legitimate service animals, we just as fervently oppose the actions of thoughtless and self - important owners who falsely demand the privileges associated with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other laws enacted to help persons with disabilities.

Social practices are based on the dominant framing, and thus authorize certain actors and actions as legitimate, and define other approaches as standing outside of legitimate consideration.

Because JAMS provides alternative dispute resolution mechanisms that operate in accordance with judicial procedures, we may also deny or limit access to personal data in the following contexts: (i) interference with law enforcement or with private causes of action, including the prevention, investigation or detection of offenses or the right to a fair trial, arbitration or mediation; (ii) disclosure where the legitimate rights or important interests of others would be violated; (iii) breaching a legal or other professional privilege or obligation; (iv) prejudicing employee security investigations or grievance proceedings or in connection with employee succession planning and corporate reorganizations; or (v) prejudicing the confidentiality necessary in monitoring, inspection or regulatory functions connected with sound management, or in future or ongoing negotiations involving JAMS.

[46] I would essentially adopt as the elements of the cause of action for public disclosure of private facts the Restatement (Second) of Torts (2010) formulation, with one minor modification: One who gives publicity to a matter concerning the private life of another is subject to liability to the other for invasion of the other's privacy, if the matter publicized or the act of the publication (a) would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, and (b) is not of legitimate concern to the public.

(3) Any other remedial action the court considers necessary to facilitate the legitimate needs of the parties and the best interest of the child.

Therefore, in accordance with the terms of our privacy statement we will not disclose to any third party for any reason either the contents of or any facts relating to the contents of a user's email or any other communication a user sends to us; provided, however, such disclosure will be made when required to do so by law or by properly issued court order or when good - faith belief exists that such action is legally necessary to: (1) comply with the law or comply with legal process served on California Legal Research, Inc.; (2) protect and defend the legitimate business interests, rights or property of California Legal Research, Inc., its users, customers, or affiliates; or (3) act in an emergency to protect the personal safety of CALRI.com users or the public.

It sounds like you have a legitimate action against him, but if you do bring an action against him at this time, then you could spiral a down fall of the company by other lenders or investors following suit and push him into bankruptcy which means nobody gets paid very much.