Where the precise boundaries of
legitimate national security concerns lies is an ever - evolving question.
This was overturned by the Supreme Court (Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer), who ruled that even though the President had
legitimate national security concerns (steel was essential for the Korean war effort), he lacked the authority to do so.
It will continue to be a rubber stamp because there are no judicial criteria for what is and is not
a legitimate national security concern.
Not exact matches
Although Canadians have a
legitimate concern in ensuring our
national security, this does not mean abandoning all of our privacy interests to government without proper justification.