Setting aside the word propaganda, I will readily assert that there has been a longstanding and well - financed effort to raise public concern by downplaying substantial, persistent and
legitimate uncertainty about the worst - case outcomes from greenhouse - driven warming and over-attributing the link between such warming and climate - related disasters and other events.
Not exact matches
But, as far as I can see, the «attacks» by vested interests are not even able to make
legitimate points (e.g.
uncertainty about the effects of clouds or aerosols in climate models).
There were
legitimate debates between scientists working in this field
about how reliable different kinds of proxy data are and what are the limits, what are the
uncertainties, and then there were the dishonest attacks against the science.
Nor does it include those who, sensing a threat from a particular scientific finding to their livelihood or ideology, create a pseudo-science to cast fear,
uncertainty and doubt
about the
legitimate science.
Although there is
uncertainty about what the precise impacts will be, there is no longer
legitimate scientific disagreement
about the fact that the climate is changing and that those changes will accelerate over the next century.
The court found, however, that Member Parrack was obligated to advise the parties
about the
uncertainty that had arisen, [68] and her statement was neutral, concerned merely with process, [71] and motivated not by self - interest but
legitimate concern for the parties.