No actual prejudice has been demonstrated by the appellants and in this case none can be assumed merely from
the length of the adjournment.
Not exact matches
There are references elsewhere in the Constitution to
adjournments of differing
lengths, nowhere does it specify exactly which
adjournments would, or would not, be subject to the pocket veto.
When they do proceed to trial, their lack
of knowledge
of the governing legislation, the rules
of evidence, the rules
of court and court processes frequently causes additional problems and increases the
length of trials and the number
of adjournments.