This makes sense to you, although it makes no sense at all to me (and I would predict it makes no sense to the other 5 billion of us non Muslims), I would have
less problems if it were applied to all citizen of that country, both men and women, those in power and the working class, the rulers and the ruled, but that is not the case.
We would have a lot
less problems if we all did this.
Also I was merlly try to make the point that our body would funtion better with
less problems if we consume more all natural fruit veggies meat and dairy free of additives, pesticides, chemicals or antibiotics.
Also, it could be related to the experienced improvement in parent - child interaction, since parents reported about their child's social communication problems, and they might report
less problems if they experience improved interaction with their child.
Not exact matches
A pro tip for public policy advocacy groups:
If you're looking for attention, it helps if your problem appears massively huge and your solution impossibly cheap — preferably less than a cup of coffee a wee
If you're looking for attention, it helps
if your problem appears massively huge and your solution impossibly cheap — preferably less than a cup of coffee a wee
if your
problem appears massively huge and your solution impossibly cheap — preferably
less than a cup of coffee a week.
What
if your
problem is
less pre-presentation butterflies and more of a tendency to stammer your way through speeches full of ummms and uhs?
If you look at the
problem backwards, you'd think about all the things you could do to create
less innovation.
But
if you have the
less - than - minor
problem of not liking networking, this fact won't do you any good, so Page 19 goes on to recommend seven great reads for the networking phobic, including:
Wagner offers no broad policy prescriptions in the interview to fix these
problems in America's schools, but
if you're an individual parent or teacher interested in encouraging an innovative outlook in your kids, he has lots of ideas (
less scheduled time, more unstructured play or self - driven exploration, for instance).
Another
problem is that
if capital returns have become far more uncertain, then the stocks should have become
less attractive in recent years rather than more.
Third, keeping rates at zero leaves the Fed with
less room to lower rates in response to
problems than it would have
if it increased rates.
If the DOL wants to discourage conflicts of interest (inarguably a
problem for the integrity of the investing business), then sell - side research should probably play a
less prominent role in developing and justifying investment recommendations.
If you're looking to invest $ 100k or
less in a new position it shouldn't be a
problem.
If the reason banks fail is because free markets in banking don't work, how do you explain the lack of the
problems you claim plague free markets in the much
less regulated pre-1934 Canadian banking industry?
But Krugman has a much bigger puzzle to explain away:
if free markets in banking are the
problem, why did Canada, which, during this period, had a far
less regulated banking system than the US, not experience the panics we did, and why did no Canadian banks fail during the Great Depression while around 9000 US banks did?
So
if we started to get inflation that's going to create a real
problem for the central banks because they won't be able to emit in the quantities of currency they've been emitting because that will fuel inflation and inflation of course destroys capital, it destroys the savings, it destroys the purchasing power of wages and people actually have
less money to spend,
less purchasing power.
Looks like
if theres a price action set up on these larger Time frames, the NFP gyrations are much
less of a
problem.
If everyone fails to hit the mark of how you define a good friend, the
problem may have
less to do with them and more to do with your expectations.
«the
less free your mindset becomes»
If you mean that, the more knowledge you acquire, the less likely it becomes to ignore the fact that Christianity if full of inconsistencies, illogic, and other problems, then ye
If you mean that, the more knowledge you acquire, the
less likely it becomes to ignore the fact that Christianity
if full of inconsistencies, illogic, and other problems, then ye
if full of inconsistencies, illogic, and other
problems, then yes.
to tell u the truth,
if Israel fix its
problems with Palestinians i think all the region will have
less issues with terrorism.
If they spent 1/10 the time, money and attention to unwed mothers, poor families, and the racial divide in adoptions (everyone wants a white baby, no one wants ethnic babies, ethnic toddlers, or white or ethnic teenagers), then maybe women would be
less scared about having
problem / unwanted pregnancies.
Would not pastors then be justified in allowing the
lesser problem to increase
if, in doing so, they are able to work significantly on the more severe compulsion that conceivably could cause something worse?
Even
if God is thought of as having slightly
less than perfect knowledge, the idea of God being able to fully appreciate ignorance seems categorically impossible.6 There are further
problems for the theory of divine relativity.
Another
problem arises from the church's increasingly local identity:
If laity care
less and
less about the denomination as a larger entity, then clergy will be the guardians of denominationalism.
The
problem is
if you either don't have certain experiences or you have different experiences or you experience the same thing but in a different way, you are made to feel
less than.
...
If our politicians were realists, they would think rather
less about missiles and the
problem of landing astronauts on the moon, rather more about hunger and moral squalor and the
problem of enabling three billion men, women, and children, who will soon be six billions, to lead a tolerably human existence without, in the process, ruining and befouling their planetary environment.
If the branches of the federal government are truly coequal, if the President and Congress are not subordinated to the Court by the Constitution (except insofar as the Court might declare them to be), then the theme of «judicial restraint» that runs wistfully through your symposium is less an appeal for the impossible than a misconstrual of the proble
If the branches of the federal government are truly coequal,
if the President and Congress are not subordinated to the Court by the Constitution (except insofar as the Court might declare them to be), then the theme of «judicial restraint» that runs wistfully through your symposium is less an appeal for the impossible than a misconstrual of the proble
if the President and Congress are not subordinated to the Court by the Constitution (except insofar as the Court might declare them to be), then the theme of «judicial restraint» that runs wistfully through your symposium is
less an appeal for the impossible than a misconstrual of the
problem.
It is wise for the minister to encourage even those who are feeling relatively well to have a physical checkup to ascertain
if there are
less obvious organic
problems which need treatment.
This was,
if anything, even farther from the truth about the special
problem of the modern middle - class American woman than the Freudian - type psychologizing, and even
less helpful in offering her an understanding of it.
But this statement is
less reassuring since a careful British study found that
if a mother was X-rayed during pregnancy, the child is about twice as likely to die of a malignant disease before its 10th birthday.11 Harrison Brown summarizes the
problem:
And
if we find that there is no one around our table who disagrees with us, well, we've found the larger
problem and we must confess that our lives look much
less like Jesus» than we may imagine.
The discouraging
problem is that an increasing population could level off its consumption only
if each person consumed
less, whereas all our habits and traditions point to rapidly increasing per capita consumption.
If we can find acceptable ways to deal with media violence, then solutions to other,
less complex,
problems in the media will become evident.
But you won't have this
problem if you cook your gluten - free noodles a little
less than I did, use thicker noodles (I had thin spaghetti on hand), or use regular pasta.
Doesn't sound like it will be a
problem, just
less crispy
if you don't finish it somehow in a pan or broiler.
Hi, I have also had a
problem with the bread not rising and wondered
if less arrowroot might work better?
If I'd had a grill grate with
less space between the grates, then this may not have been as much of a
problem.
If anyone else had this problem, I would recommend leaving the truffles in the fridge or even freezer until just before you serve them:) Will let you know if using less agave solves my problem to
If anyone else had this
problem, I would recommend leaving the truffles in the fridge or even freezer until just before you serve them:) Will let you know
if using less agave solves my problem to
if using
less agave solves my
problem too.
If Walcott who is of significantly
less skill and quality has managed to con his way into a 10 year stay at Arsenal then Wilshere should really have no
problem convincing the boss he deserves a new contract.
Even
if they turn out to be just the usual sort of spurious rumours that we will be seeing a lot more of in the coming months, the Arsenal boss still looks set to have a big
problem with his star striker, all because of the strange decision to hold another Copa America tournament this summer, even though the last one was held
less than a year ago, with Alexis scoring the winning penalty against Argentina to win it for the first time.
Neither line is particularly deep, and the defense lost just enough to make you wonder
if last year's depth
problems will be any
less problematic.
I don't have a
problem with negativity from Falcon fans because 1) the team justifies it like no other, 2)
if we required all fans to have rose colored glasses there would be no need for a «Falcoholic» discussion site, and 3) negative fans aren't
less supportive of the team just because they're pessimistic.
I would say Weenger has had
less luck with developing holding midfielders and GKs,
if the def has a weak belly ahead of it and a poor GK behind then of course the def will have
problems but the def was not always the issue.
it does not matter
if the player is cheap or not the bigger
problem would be that very player will be on our books for four years so he better be good, that's why when I look at Chelsea and city these clubs throw players out with in a season un
less that player is expensive or injured, so waiting to sign wclass 4 years is better than signing just to compete for a season to complain about more signings
Maybe
if we had
less people like you who just keep repeating «injuries happen to everyone» then we would have actually gone out and fixed this
problem sooner than last and this summer.
I really hope Bellerin becomes more consistent with his quality.That's what will make him world class.He really needs to improve.His main
problem is that he's not yet been able to create a balance between all of his abilities.Hopefully with more game time and
less injuries this season he can play more maturely and improve his decision making.The talent given to him is so huge that he can be one of the very best RB in Europe
if he wants to.He just needs to try as much as possible to maximise his potential by being patient and working hard.He can be so so good
if he works hard.
If the older players get
less and
less money, while the young players are still drastically underpaid, there will be labor
problems.
Yes,
problem is though, even
if he is a million times better than Giroud he is still
less prolific — bit of an evidential hurdle to overcome wouldn't you say?
The form, fight and confidence that Arsenal have been showing in the last two months can not help you think about what might have been,
if we had started the season better or had a few
less injury
problems to cope with.
my
problem with AW is that for years he resisted to buy good players because of a million or two difference from asking price today's market those players are worth triple, we could of had a great team with possibly wining the EPL twice and possibly semis or final of CL,
if he had just spent the money in the bank, Chelsea are in dept around 850 Million pounds (possible the bulk to Abromovich) and same for Man - United and few more, we are the only club that is cash rich with funds available around hidden 350 million and more accumulating every season, how i know this because i look at their end of year accounts outgoings and income there is around 100 to 120 million
less outgoings then income, we can easily spend 700 Million in the summer and we will be well in with FFP rules and only have 350m to pay in two years which we can with bigger and higher sponsorship coming any day now