I mean and you have to — He knew far
less about science than Churchill, quite plainly.
With incredible creativity, sharp humor, and deep empathy, Whaley creates a story that is much
less about the science fiction of coming back to life and more about living life in the present.
This hefty book is
less about science fiction than it is about relationships.Yes, most of the action does take place on another planet, but that is not the real focus of the book.
With incredible creativity, sharp humor, and deep empathy, John Whaley creates a story that is much
less about the science fiction of coming back to life and more about living life in the present.
Unfortunately, such pursuits have become commonplace in our world today; and these tactics are utilized by those who care
less about science and more about squelching free thinking and scientific debate when opinions are presented that differ from their own.
Turned out the event was
less about science than it was about communications — and the challenges of communicating about climate change were never more visible, or more daunting.
It's true that recent CA posts have been more about auditing the UAE reviews and
less about the science.
As a technician not a scientist I have long been of the opinion that climate science went from being
less about science than it is about the promotion of a political agenda.
«This individual understands
less about science (and climate change) than the average kindergartner,» Michael Mann, a Pennsylvania State University meteorology professor, wrote of Cruz's statements.
Such attacks are
less about the science on offer from dissenters, and more to do with singling out those who go against the political consensus that the world is doomed unless we reduce our carbon footprint now.
It seems people are talking
less about the science and more about the alleged actions of a small group of climate scientists.
Not exact matches
Whether or not you opt to dig further into the
science, the takeaway is clear — most parents these days are far too stressed
about «quality time» and it's making both them and their kids
less happy.
Last June, the internet giant debuted its Made with Code campaign in an effort to get young women excited
about computer
science — a field that
less than one percent of high school girls think of as part of their future.
While
science can easily suggest that eating a diet consisting of
less meat and more vegetables is likely healthier, there remains a question
about what the majority of consumers really want to eat and whether we're heading towards an Uncanny Valley moment.
You just have to take the time to think
about it long enough to see that these ancient written texts were written by humans with
less knowledge
about science than we have now.
And back then, wasn't it the fans wrapped up in «theories» who were ultimately disappointed when they found out that Lost wasn't really concerned with answering the thousands of questions it had raised — that it was
less a heady show
about theology and
science and more an emotional show
about its characters and the human experience?
They usually don't even have half a clue
about the ideas, evidence and
science they are rejecting and they know even
less about the religious dogma they are backing up.
The more you know
about science today and the religions of the ancient world, the
less it is possible to believe what you were taught as a child, even if you wanted to.
Physics - lite @ CN77 & Andrew Andrew's Quote «It's not all that pointless, see while you would never be convinced that your bronze age mythological beliefs
about the creation of the universe are wrong, since I can rebut (with peer reviewed journal articles no
less) any claim you make, in rather stunning detail, those who are not so well versed on the subject who read the dialogue could be swayed to the side of
science.
With
less panache, but with equal force and even further empirical social
science evidence, her method resembles Roland Barthes» Mythologies in its outlines of the deep structure of the contemporary beliefs and practices surrounding our most deeply held moral codes
about human sexual desire — or should I say eros.
It is easier to convince someone
about magical things if they have
less understanding of
science.
I was learning more and more
about science, but was
less and
less able to defend my religious convictions.
With the change of scientific vision in the present century there has come
about a very radical change in the method of
science, its being
less a description of phenomena and the formulation of universal laws, and more a statistical formulation of probabilities and a venture in determining which of the many probabilities might be taken to be true to fact in this situation.
Real Christians Hate Religion... Real Christians Hate Hypocrites... Real Christians should be more like Christ... How could you claim to be a Christian if you don't even know your Christ... The reason why doomed people would never understand Christ is because they never tried to search for the Truth... They only listen to such rubbish things rather than the Truth... Read and do more and Talk
less... It doesn't take a genius to know that Someone created you rather than you coming to life with just atoms randomly hitting each other... If you're really smart, think
about it... Stop the non-sense talk
about God and
Science and find it out for yourself...
The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how
science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should raise questions
about the meaning of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be
less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.
In fact, «the more the elementary particle physicists tell us
about the nature of the fundamental laws, the
less relevance they seem to have to the very real problems of the rest of
science, much
less of society.»
Not sure which is more terrifying — Pat sounding somewhat rational
about science, or the fact that 46 % of people surveyed think the planet and everything on it is
less than 10,000 years old.
I was learning more and more
about science but was
less and
less able to defend my religious convictions, which were constantly under challenge.
No one will ever know enough
about science, life, death, love, God, or even themselves to fully understand it, much
less predict what the future holds.
Armed with
science, sociology and pluralistic awareness, liberals sometimes seem to offer rational reasons why evangelicals should take
less seriously their talk
about God's self - revelation on behalf of a lost human world.
Science is, in fact, provisional, in the sense that our conclusions
about the age of the earth are
less solid than the observations from which those conclusions are drawn.
Whitehead experiments for a while with deliberations
about the various theories of the world with regard to the degree to which they abstract from the world, and
about adjusting a sequence of more or
less abstract perspectives on the world, oriented at the level of abstraction attainable in the mathematized natural
sciences.
I love knowing the
science about it (
less brown sugar, etc).
I think you might find it has a lot
less to do with
science and facts than it does
about a person's core beliefs that evolved from the thousands of tiny steps that led them through life up to this moment in time.
The
science that gives evidence that sometimes, for any number of reasons, there is pain and before it can be resolved there is
less milk and stress and fear and even
less milk and concern and doubt
about milk from another.
I don't really put too much stock in academic authority of people in social
sciences until they talk
about testable predictions like real scientists do; or at the very least deal with # s. Without that, they're just people who have opinions that are no more nor
less valid than anyone who isn't an academic social scientist.
Being proactive
about the way you phrase your key ideas to speak directly to an audience's interests, or even embedding a discussion of
science in places where
less motivated audiences might discover them accidentally, will help you more deeply engage with that audience, which will likely increase the odds of achieving your engagement goal.
Those who know more
about climate
science, for example, are slightly more likely to accept that global warming is real and caused by humans than those who know
less on the subject.
The Tata Institute of Fundamental Research in Mumbai, a stronghold in physical
sciences, must make do with $ 46 million in 2014 to 2015,
about one - third
less than last year.
For Republicans, the more knowledge they have
about climate
science the
less likely they are to accept the theory of anthropogenic global warming (whereas Democrats» confidence goes up).
► «The involvement of [online communities in discussions
about suspect publications and possible research misconduct] has made the standardization of processes to address allegations more complex and has led to
less patience from the scientific community and the public with what are often long timelines in institutional misconduct investigations,»
Science journals Editor - in - Chief Marcia McNutt wrote in an editorial in this week's issue of
Science.
And that suggests today's budget may be silent on, or vague
about, what the president is seeking for some
science agencies, much
less for specific programs and cross-agency initiatives.
The Tata Institute of Fundamental Research in Mumbai, «a stronghold in physical
sciences,» should receive just $ 46 million in the 2014 to 2015 fiscal year,
about a third
less than it received last year.
Even if they did, notes the working paper, «little is known
about effective teaching of mathematics in preschool, and even
less is known
about science.»
If you missed this news, that may be because it received
less play in the
science sections of the world's newspapers than in those slender nether pages of items
about burglars getting stuck in chimneys and drunken Russian men waking up with spikes in their heads.
From humanity's first, flawed foray to the surface of a comet to the celebrated discovery of (and
less celebrated skepticism
about) primordial gravitational waves, 2014 has brought some historic successes and failures in space
science and physics.
► In
Science, Dennis Normile wrote about the impact of the sinking of the Taiwanese research vessel Ocean Research V, «less than 2 years after its maiden scientific cruise,» on Taiwanese science, calling it «a severe setback for Taiwanese oceanography and related fields.
Science, Dennis Normile wrote
about the impact of the sinking of the Taiwanese research vessel Ocean Research V, «
less than 2 years after its maiden scientific cruise,» on Taiwanese
science, calling it «a severe setback for Taiwanese oceanography and related fields.
science, calling it «a severe setback for Taiwanese oceanography and related fields.»
Even as major media figures such as New York Times columnist and megaselling «flat - world» guru Thomas Friedman were trumpeting Gathering Storm's conclusions, experts in labor - power economics and research administration were voicing
less publicized doubts
about any purported dearth of well - trained U.S.
science graduates.
Once DACA protections came into effect, however, diagnoses in the children of protected mothers dropped by
about half, from 7.9 % to
less than 4 %, the team reports today in
Science.
In fiscal year 2013, for instance, DOE's
science programs received $ 1.4 billion
less than the spending target of
about $ 6 billion in the 2010 law.