The program is run at elementary schools in neighborhoods that have a lower income and
less access to healthy foods, such as Cornerstone of Washington School, Cedar Tree Academy, and Powell Elementary School, Turner Elementary, and DC Prep, where USGBC staff volunteered.
Not exact matches
That system could easily result in a world of haves and have nots when it comes
to access to less processed,
healthier food.
Also, it sounds like many of the items in development (rice bowls, wraps, etc.) will only be offered on the a la carte line, which, as I've written about before, could easily result in a world of haves and have nots when it comes
to access to less processed,
healthier food.
«USDA has continued
to show flexibility in implementing these new standards, and Congress should focus on partnering with USDA, states, schools, and parents
to help our kids have
access to more
healthy food, not
less.»
And it works both ways: a la carte lines can mean that poor kids lose
access to less - than -
healthy but highly - kid - popular junk
food like Flamin» Hot Cheetos and tater tots, and it can also mean that only kids with money can
access better
food, like yogurts, salads and fresh sandwiches that are only offered a la carte.
It may help you worry
less to know that in the early years, all emotionally and physically
healthy kids who have consistent
access to enough
food will eat only what they need.
«The thought is that greater
access to healthier foods may have promoted
healthier diets and, in turn,
less coronary plaque formation.»
Co-lead author Jeffrey Wing said, «The thought is that greater
access to healthier foods may have promoted
healthier diets and, in turn,
less coronary plaque formation.»
The current standards were introduced because voluntary school
food guidelines introduced in 2001 requiring caterers
to provide
healthy options but not
to limit
access to less healthy food had failed
to promote
healthier eating in school.
Globally, the dominant economic intervention affecting
food pricing is national taxation on
food to raise general revenue.17, 18 In Australia, the basic
foods required
to maintain health were mostly exempted from the Goods and Services Tax (GST), and the price of these
foods was expected
to fall after the introduction of the new tax system in 2000.19 However, in Queensland from 2000
to 2001, the price of a basket of
healthy foods increased by 12 %, more than twice that of
less healthy options.20 This highlights the unpredictability of complex economic systems and the need for rigorous testing of economic solutions
to increase
access to healthy food.18 Such testing is imperative within remote communities, but baseline data are not readily available as Australia lacks a comprehensive
food and nutrition monitoring and surveillance system.
Food and nutrition: By 2018 (within ten years) at least 90 % of Indigenous families have access to a standard healthy food basket (or supply) at the cost of less than 25 % of their available inc
Food and nutrition: By 2018 (within ten years) at least 90 % of Indigenous families have
access to a standard
healthy food basket (or supply) at the cost of less than 25 % of their available inc
food basket (or supply) at the cost of
less than 25 % of their available income;