Upper - middle - class parents have the means to spend two to three times more time with their preschool children than
less affluent parents.
Not exact matches
Another part of the answer has to do with early cognitive stimulation:
Affluent parents typically provide more books and educational toys to their kids in early childhood; low - income
parents are
less likely to live in neighborhoods with good libraries and museums and other enrichment opportunities, and they're
less likely to use a wide and varied vocabulary when speaking to their infants and children.
It's time to give
less -
affluent parents the same opportunity.
After interviewing more than 50 of these gentrifiers about their school - choice process, I concluded that it is the substantive differences in
parenting styles between the white, upper - middle - class
parents and the nonwhite,
less -
affluent parents that are hindering school integration, as these
parenting styles directly affect school culture and expectations.
The majority of these schools are in more
affluent districts, where
parents have college degrees and encourage their sons and their daughters to do well academically, or in
less advantaged communities where the community itself has rallied behind educational goals.
While the millions of dollars
parents raise is equivalent to
less than 1 percent of total school spending, the concentration of these dollars in
affluent schools results in considerable advantages for a small portion of already advantaged students.9
But they have helped create a two - tier education system — one in which
affluent parents can help their schools weather state budget crises and maintain programs
less affluent districts can only dream about.
An evaluation study of the district's equity fund highlighted several implementation challenges.65 Some PTAs simply did not comply with the district's policy to give back some dollars, and the district had difficulty figuring out how to exempt some PTA expenses fairly from redistribution.66 The evaluators did not examine how this policy affected PTA revenues, but there was significant pushback from members of the community, with some
parents threatening to reduce donations during initial policy negotiations.67 A group of
parents voiced that the approach was punitive, and that instead,
parents should be encouraged to donate to a separate equity fund or to other,
less affluent schools.68 Other districts that have considered establishing an equity fund have feared similar pushback, worrying that rich
parents will threaten to leave the district, disinvest in their schools, or decrease their overall contributions.69
School leaders in
affluent areas are able to call on support from wealthier
parents to provide funding for better facilities, unlike leaders in
less advantaged schools, where «
parents aren't in a position to help financially».
Though she later told JCI she was sympathetic to the idea of the state's need to take additional measures to help teachers rated in
less affluent, urban districts such as Jersey City, which tend to have tougher classroom environments,
parent Gina Po told the round - table it really can't let them off the hook.
Giving
parents more education options, especially
parents who are
less affluent, increases the likelihood of finding the best school match for their child's learning needs.
Studies have shown that even highly functional low - income
parents speak far
less to their children, on average, than
affluent parents.