When finances are well planned and managed, there will be
less arguments about them.
Not exact matches
Arguments then become
less about anger and more
about drilling down into the heart of a problem.
Admittedly, one could make the same
argument about gold, but gold has been widely accepted by humankind as a thing of value for more than two - and - a-half thousand years — compared to
less than a decade for bitcoin.
With more than a hint of exasperation, Scalia concludes: «One will search in vain the document we are supposed to be construing for text that provides the basis for the
argument over these distinctions; and will find in our society's tradition regarding abortion no hint that the distinctions are constitutionally relevant, much
less any indication how a constitutional
argument about them ought to be resolved.
Despite my general sympathy with what Dreher seeks to do in this book, I am
less enthusiastic
about other facets of his
argument.
On the reading I propose, the Reformation schism was brought
about instead by contingent human choices in a confused historical context defined
less by clear and principled theological
argument (though that of course was present) than by a peculiar and distinctively sixteenth - century combination of overheated and ever - escalating polemics, cold - blooded Realpolitik, and fervid apocalyptic dreaming.
Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth
about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little
less sanguine
about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our
argument for inclusion»?
Oh, and the Christian aspect of this
argument, I couldn't care
less about.
Forcing the case for this kind of living moral alternative into the narrow confines of an
argument that is just
about religion and liberty makes the treasure we seek to protect seem smaller and
less significant than it truly is.
And you will in turn take the strongest part of your
argument and attack the weakest part of my
argument... This is probably
less about egotism, and more
about the brokenness and insecurity of most people.
Kent, you babbled» «It amazes me that you'll believe the liars of this world that care
less about your soul, but when Christians that actually read His truth tell you what He wants, you go into circular
arguments that proves that you can talk / type but does nothing for loving and following Jesus.»
It amazes me that you'll believe the liars of this world that care
less about your soul, but when Christians that actually read His truth tell you what He wants, you go into circular
arguments that proves that you can talk / type but does nothing for loving and following Jesus.
Such
arguments as «the Church teaches --» were destined to become
less and
less sufficient to win immediate acceptance for the ideas they prefaced The validity of traditions was questioned; general beliefs
about physical phenomena were subjected to various tests.
I think Hannon and I actually agree that the debate should be
about the procreative / non - procreative sexual dichotomy and not the same - sex / opposite - sex dichotomy, and that we differ only in what the solution should be; this subject is the area in which I would have preferred a stronger and
less assumptive
argument.
These include a fantastic sequence in which Scout and Jem and Dill play the main parts of a revivalist meeting that culminates in Dill's grandly appearing as nothing
less than the Holy Ghost, but not before the children have a pointed
argument about denominational differences — Methodist vs. Baptist — and related liturgical practices (how's that for dating the novel?).
I make it
less about making a good
argument and more
about proving myself to the skeptics for the sake of improving my status.
The cause of this uneasiness becomes clearer if we question Ignatieff's
argument at several points: the validity of the moral paradigm itself, the assumptions from which he proceeds, the inconsistencies in how he describes the limits to be observed in doing the «
lesser evil,» and his conclusions
about specific elements of the war on terror.
Others, confused
about essences and accidents, misconstrue the
argument as entailing that infertile couples, the elderly, and adoptive parents have second - class marriages worthy of
less dignity than those of their fertile peers.
«We're all for
arguments about the ethics of meat consumption, but we also realise that the easiest way to encourage vegetarianism is to make it seem like
less of a frontier and more of a transition.
Besides several teams who have questions surrounding one or possibly two players, there is no squad that has so many issues heading into the final week of the transfer window... even Monaco, who have lost numerous players from their starting 11 have
less controversy swirling in and around their club and they have champion's league play to contend with this season... just think of how ridiculous this situation is especially considering that we have had the same manager for over 20 years... no team should be better organized than ours... if nothing else, that should be the one advantage this team holds over all others, yet the exact opposite has occurred... this fact is even more disturbing considering the main
argument against removing Wenger from his managerial position was that there was no suitable replacement and that people feared some sort of perceived drop - off if a new manager was brought into the mix... based on what we've witnessed since the time of his contract renewal a monkey with a magic eight ball could have done an adequate job... I hate to make jokes, in light of our current dilemma, but this team is so screwed up if I don't laugh
about it, the only plausible response is to either cry or do something incredibly destructive... just look around this squad and try to see what our delusional manager sees that allow him to make such positive statements
about our current team
I just opened justarsenal and i saw this whole discussion (
Arguments) between
about 90 % anti wenger and 10 % (maybe even
less) AKB's.
There's also the category systemthat was set up by the club, which kind of sends the
argument about «sucking it up» a little
less palatable.
And
about the gym class
argument, I feel that as more and more boys are left uncirc'd (which is the trend these days), the
less big a deal it will be for the circ'd boys to see the uncirc'd boys.
... or instead of buying all of these new items, use items you already have around the house — old purses (for girls), tupperware, visit second - hand stores for cloth napkins... it's hard to get excited
about «be a green parent» articles, blog entries, and websites that just tell us to go buy something b / c it is green... even the Waste Free Lunch website tries to sell us on how much
less it costs to pack a lunch, saying that cloth napkins, lunch bag, reusable containers and thermoses don't cost anything while tabulating the cost of paper / disposable versions... but there is an initial layout, so that
argument doesn't hold my attention.
It is a challenge to deal with a high level of resistance... If I were in that spot what I would LIKE to do would be to mirror the first response that seems to be moving away from engagement... the
less rational
argument... I'd try to stay with his energy... like, «so you're really firm
about your view that...» reflecting back what I heard him say, and continue along that path.
April had such a compelling
argument - maybe it's
less about breasts, and more
about a culture raised to believe in bottle and formula feeding?»
We could have an
argument about whether the outside suppliers are cheaper because, as specialists, they are more efficient, or because they are paid
less — though I'm pretty sure I know what the John Lewis cleaners would say
about that.
And I suspect, I hope, that the money's just simply going to become
less important and that ultimately, campaigns make a determination that hey, they might better spend their time with the candidate out doing other things and actually thinking
about the
argument and the message that you want to send, than constantly raising all this money that buys you maybe some TV ads that nobody's watching but nothing that's gonna actually turn the campaign in your favor.
«Too often debates
about AV are
less like political
arguments, and more like scientific discussions, where people get lost in a language of proportionality and preferences, probabilities and possibilities.
«The left must avoid the trap of countering an
argument about less state by making a case for more state,» he writes.
He also repeated previous comments
about ecstasy - that it is
less dangerous than riding a horse - and said those who wished for the drug to be downgraded to class B had already won the
argument.
One of the SEEC's main
arguments in its Tuesday letter was that the proposed pro-Malloy mailing is 99.6 percent devoted to photos and words supporting Malloy's re-election, while
less than half of 1 percent of it contains a tiny printed message
about how voters may get to the polls on Nov. 4.
But his columns and features
about the real thing are no
less entertaining, even now, and the
arguments Klein and Cuomo had back in the «80s and «90s
about the nature of liberal government and personal responsibility reverberate, unsettled, in today's Democratic politics.
Women who reported continuous or remote past HT use had
less pronounced kyphosis by the time they were in their mid-80s than never - users, supporting the
argument for HT as a possible early postmenopause treatment for women concerned
about their posture and fracture risk.
There's no room for
arguments about extinctions being natural, or inevitable, much
less for triage.
«Just because they hear that an
argument comes from the other party they think
about that information
less.
If this has been posted here before, forgive my blindness, but someone just sent me it and damn, the old
arguments about legumes are so «over» for me anyway, I was very happy to find this review summarizes almost entirely the evidence - based reasons «why», from a paleo perspective no
less.
There is an ongoing
argument about net carbs, but if you aren't getting into ketosis then restrict it to 20grams or
less of total carbs per day.
Cannes Film Festival Lionel Shriver's 2003 bestseller «We Need to Talk
About Kevin» is a rare pop novel indeed: a nippy, low - comfort social essay that lures readers into messily untied
arguments on topical subject matter the talk - show circuit would have far
less trouble resolving.
Rather than rehearsing legal
arguments about why the Lovings» marriage was no
less deserving of recognition than any other couple's, Nichols shows us the truth of that statement in their domestic lives, the small courtesies and large sacrifices they share.
The originality of Lemann's
argument lies
less in what he says
about the tests themselves than in his account of the vision of an engineered society that the founders and supporters of ETS (James Bryant Conant, Henry Chauncy, and Clark Kerr, to name some of the best known) had in mind.
The
argument is that this tells you nothing
about whether the DC Public Schools were more or
less effective.
And of course there is the price factor in it as well in support of this
argument as perhaps it makes better sense to go for a compact adaptation of an e-reader that costs a few hundred dollars
less rather than to buy the Kindle DX with a bigger 9.7 - inch sized screen that will set one back by
about $ 500.
Our view is that Grantham's
arguments explain high past earnings growth, and may be relevant for near - to mid-term valuation levels, but are far
less informative
about future growth rates.
We know
about an investing strategy that beats Buy - and - Hold in 102 out of 110 time - periods, an investing strategy that permits us to obtain far higher returns at dramatically
less risk, an investing strategy that permits us all to retire years sooner and that would bring us out of this economic crisis if we could share it with millions of middle - class investors (if people could switch to an investment strategy that would put their retirement plans back on track, they would feel free to start spending again and businesses could start hiring again), and our first reaction is to come up with convoluted
arguments as to why the best thing to do is to AVOID learning more
about it and to AVOID getting the word out to the millions of middle - class people whose lives we have destroyed with our promotion of Buy - and - Hold.
Sure, corp. earnings are higher in absolute terms vs. the CPI reported, yet your
argument that the CAPE is really 14 does nt work in my humble opinion because the average worker is earning
less or
about the same as he was 10 years ago... Therefore the demand has not gone up as it would if this stealth inflation was improving our lives and making stocks cheaper...
The
argument could be made that if Netflix started offering
less mainstream TV, and focused more on an independent platform (youtube for example), I'm sure most people wouldn't question anyone complaining
about it.
In your work however you seem
less critical
about the institution part but rather use the institution as a means for your
argument.
But, when understood properly, the EM's introduction of creative tension can be a source of originality and, though seemingly
less structured than the Agile Strategist's methodical
arguments, is an important form of critical thinking
about the way forward.
The board has attracted high - powered market types like Mr. Schwartzman, dealer Lawrence Luhring and Frieze Art Fair director Amanda Sharp, as well as prominent artists like Rirkrit Tiravanija and Ms. Harrison, and they're all working to build an organization with an annual budget of only
about $ 1 million —
less than the price of many Damien Hirst spot paintings — into a place that can host important debates, and maybe provoke some
arguments.