Sentences with phrase «less at my answer»

Not exact matches

While answering a question about other names that were considered for the series — one being «Nonprophit,» when the script focused more on the main character's job at a non-profit and less on her friendship with Molly — she mentioned it was a challenge selling network executives on the name Insecure.

Some former and current Googlers have listed lesser known Google products over at answers site Quora.

Other questions genotype analysis could answer include whether a given athlete is at elevated risk for tendon ruptures or cartilage tears, whether her muscles require more or less recovery time than the norm, and why certain diets work for some people and not others.

To answer that, first, consider that even at its frantic pace of growth, ecommerce still represents less than 10 percent of all retail.

He is less successful at answering questions that liturgical skeptics are likely to ask.

Joseph Ratzinger had answered from the Christian perspective precisely the question that Pope Francis» homily raised (if less reverently) in some circles of skeptics yesterday: If non-believers can go to heaven, why bother with faith at all?

Here, at first sight, the answer is less clear.

This speaking of God may ultimately only point to the question which is man himself and thus hint at God's mystery in silence, the result may be less adequate than any statement on another subject, the answer, aimed at God's bright «heaven», may ever again fall back into the dark sphere of man or may consist in inexorably upholding the question that transcends any definition, formula or phenomenon.

However, Rice also notes that there was, and always has been, another side both to Calvin and the Reformed tradition — a side that was less confident in the intellect's ability to answer all questions — a side that could acknowledge ambiguity and be open to mystery at the heart of the faith — and that understood God to be immanent as well as transcendent, and one whose «dependability came not from being unchanging, but from being loving.»

Preaching can learn from counseling (and creative education) at another point — that it is far less help to people, in the long run, to give them answers than it is to provide them with resources for finding their own answers.

I've been hesitant to answer this question at one level because hindsight is 20/20, and it feels a little less than honest to (a) see how things play out and then (b) pronounce how I should have done things differently.

It would seem that at least death deserves death, that nothing less is sufficient to answer the gravity of the deed.

So, to answer your question: the kind of «knowing» I apply to scripture is not of an objective / historical / scientific kind, but a kind that is, at least for me, no less true.

The Prisoner remains silent throughout, answering him, at the end, only with a kiss.17 It is no less than the supplanting of power with love, poetically rendered.

Now the editors of Commonweal have answered that the comments were, in fact, awful calumny, but that they were left by blog readers, not contributors, and nobody over at Commonweal agrees with them, much less hates First Things.

For him, it would not suffice that absolute might sat enthroned at the center of the universe; such power must itself answer to common standards of equity, not less than the lowliest man.

One is reminded of the boy Jesus, how, according to the story in Luke 2:46, asking and answering questions in the Temple at the age of twelve, he threw the teachers of his people into astonishment, and not less so his parents: «Did you not know that I must be in my Father's house?»

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

This team must answer fans rage, not the complete one, but at less, save our dignity please!

So, while the breathalyser might provide one answer, another, simpler and less confrontational one might simply be to shut the bars - or at least some of them, for some of the time.

I am less clear what the «Will Labour campaign» answer will be, at least on «how» and «how strongly».

Landau testified that he spent «less than two minutes» practicing on a CPR mannequin at the academy and was given both the questions and answers before a written certification exam.

It's less political theory, and more cryptography that you probably want to look at in order to answer your question.

The vote would come less than two weeks after city officials received low marks from Council members for their inability to answer questions about the legislation at a hearing.

That seemed to me a rather disingenuous answer and to many people there was a little doubt what General Groves really thought about this, and I have to say that partly at least on this account, the Los Alamos scientists were intimidated, felt intimidated; and in fact the people in Chicago who felt much less intimidation of that sort, they were not living on a military base, and they may have been wondering what to do with themselves anyway at that point.

You're probably wondering why and the answer is simple — your workout will be less effective if you get mentally and physically tired at the beginning, and you also have a greater chance of getting yourself hurt.

To enter the competition, entrants are to send enter online at www.womenshealthandfitness.com.au/competitions and answer the question ««In 25 words or less tell us what in your life has brought you deep healing or self love?»

On a positive note, the answer to when will I notice results from HGH injections is considerably less time than it took to the state of deficiency you are at now.

-- How to burn the same calories as folks that hit the gym for 7 days in only 3 days or less... — The crazy buzz about carbohydrates and all the confusion surrounding them in dieting... — How to get guaranteed ripped six pack abs by following 3 simple little known rules... — How to quickly tighten up your arms, legs, shoulders and your overall physique... — The # 1 quickest way to lose weight — according to a certified fitness trainer... (not what you think)-- Top 5 nutritional suggestions for working out and maintaining weight from a certified nutrition specialist... — What supplements are OKAY and which ones are NOT OKAY to take... EVER — Sarah's surprising thoughts on eating at night before bed... (you won't believe her answer)

At each phase, participants were included if they had answered at least 8 of the FFQ sweet food and beverage items47 (less than 5 % of eligible sample had one missing item and about 1 % two or more), their ethnicity was known to be either White, Black or South Asian, and participants were not energy misreporters (see aboveAt each phase, participants were included if they had answered at least 8 of the FFQ sweet food and beverage items47 (less than 5 % of eligible sample had one missing item and about 1 % two or more), their ethnicity was known to be either White, Black or South Asian, and participants were not energy misreporters (see aboveat least 8 of the FFQ sweet food and beverage items47 (less than 5 % of eligible sample had one missing item and about 1 % two or more), their ethnicity was known to be either White, Black or South Asian, and participants were not energy misreporters (see above).

The answer is probably to do less and go at your own pace.

There is a «Help» section at your disposal to answer the most frequently asked questions and a great customer support service that is ready to help with less typical and more complex situations.

The new «Personal Matches» feature searches through hundreds of thousands of photos at LoveAgain and makes answering all of those boring behavioral profile questions much less important.

He did not want to respond to the question and deflected it for me to answer first, which I answered that I preferred to date one person at a time as it was less confusing.

Really??? So rather than post a response at all, much less one with an answer in it, you just deleted my entire response.

Throughout 2017, there have been several developers who more or less gave the same answer when asked if they'd bring their games over to Switch: «No, we don't have any plans for Switch at the moment.»

Less than a year ago he was on stage at the Royal Albert Hall in the reunited Monkees, full of life, hogging the stage, hamming it up and celebrating the wonderful songs of America's manufactured answer to The Beatles.

Other techniques that may fall into «less relevant» include such ones as «Stretch It,» which is designed to help «meet students where they are and push them in a way that's directly responsive to what they've shown they can already do,» and becomes more embedded in a blended - learning environment; «Wait Time,» which is designed to help all students have a moment to answer a question, but isn't relevant when each child is working at her own pace online; «Do Now» to help focus students on a particular learning activity when they enter the classroom; and several tips around varying pacing for the entire classroom, which become more irrelevant when each student has a unique pacing schedule.

Asked to rate the extent to which poverty affected their students learning, if at all, 87 % answered to a significant extent; 12 % said to a small extent; less than 1 % of respondents stated that it had no effect at all and less than 1 % answered «don't know».

The closest answer, at least what could be discerned from host Mini USA's marketing presentations, seems to be because the Paceman is seen as a unique blend of hatchback, coupe and sports activity vehicle that is a sportier, less family - oriented and more youthful counterpoint to the popular but practical four - door Countryman.

For anyone considering the upgrade quandary — whether an iPad with a Retina display is worth the money, versus an iPad 2 at $ 100 less — the answer is yes, the display alone is worth the extra outlay.

Answer: The short answer to how to price your book is at LEAST 50 % LESS than your print veAnswer: The short answer to how to price your book is at LEAST 50 % LESS than your print veanswer to how to price your book is at LEAST 50 % LESS than your print version.

Amazon's Kindle Oasis is back for 2017 with a second - generation model that answers nearly all of the complaints we had about the original, and at a price that's $ 40 less to boot.

Earlier this year I answered a post on the numbers of new releases from publishers divided by sex, and looking at «newness» Back then the traditional publishers were skewed marginally female, and if you took out the long established authors and just did the 3 book or less than 10 years in publishing — very skewed to female.

Much as this seems less accessible to readers without an eReader, it is the most workable answer at present.

To answer Erica's question: at eBookSoda we don't require any reviews to promote brand new releases (3 months or less).

@Juve: there is no worksheet in the question, but if you mean the QDCGW referenced in Dilip's answer and linked in BrenBarn's answer, worksheet line 3 «Enter the smaller of line 15 or line 16 of schedule D [but not less than zero]» is long - term gain net of short - term loss, which (plus qualified dividends and adjusted for for 4952 if used) is the amount taxed at lower rates.

For most people the answer is yes — although if you have a good pension at work, you can certainly contribute less to your RRSP than someone without one.

To answer it correctly, you must understand that if your money grows at less than the inflation rate, its purchasing power declines.

Lenders can look at your application and give you an answer in 90 seconds or less.