A carbon tax would allow energy efficiencies to become cost effective faster, a carbon tax would cause the utilities to use
less carbon fuels in the electrical grid and a carbon tax would promote fuel switching faster.
Not exact matches
Environmental groups are employing the same strategy, in a
less direct way, on the oilpatch, by raising public opposition to pipelines and low -
carbon fuel standards for refineries in California and Europe.
On the other hand, if higher
fuel taxes work as intended and get drivers to burn
less carbon, then those people will find themselves ahead.
A gasoline provider could blend ethanol into their
fuel to make it
less carbon - intensive, for instance — something Canadian
fuel providers already do.
The next time the premiers huddle together they should start talking about how to wean our economy off its overreliance on high - cost
carbon fuels that the rest of the world has little need for today and will need even
less of tomorrow.
Then I tried the economic freedom line: «A
carbon tax makes fossil
fuels more expensive, so people have an incentive to consume
less.
Although Obama supports clean coal and coal to liquid if they can emit 20 %
less carbon over their life cycle then traditional
fuels.
Increases in the price of fossil
fuels since 1979 have meant that
less has been burned and
less carbon dioxide has been added to the atmosphere.
Industrialized countries with
less than a quarter of the world's population are responsible for about three - quarters of the
carbon dioxide released by burning fossil
fuels.
Measuring how and where emissions occur can support
carbon - cutting initiatives like eco-lanes that prioritize alternative
fuel vehicles and eco-driving practices, or encourage system operators to optimize traffic signals for greater throughput and
less fuel consumption.
Instead, the Administration's plans for energy conservation and using energy sources with
less CO2 emission will help in the short - term, he said; down the road, a new National Climate Change Technology Initiative will help develop cutting - edge technologies such as
fuel cells and
carbon dioxide sequestration, Bush said.
Europeans want
fuel - efficient cars that spout
less carbon dioxide (CO2), the suspected culprit in global warming.
Plug - ins use about a third of the
fuel that a standard hybrid does, which means that the cars themselves emit
less carbon dioxide and other pollutants.
Burning gas emits
less carbon dioxide than burning other fossil
fuels.
Stronger, longer - lasting modern concrete, made with
less fuel and
less release of
carbon into the atmosphere, may be the legacy of a deeper understanding of how the Romans made their incomparable concrete.
The low -
carbon fuel standard orders providers to reduce the
carbon intensity of their
fuels by 10 percent by 2020 through efforts such as blending in biofuels that result in
less greenhouse gases emitted when burned.
While biofuels from crops, grasses, wood, agricultural residues and other materials emit
less carbon than fossil
fuels over a crop - to - vehicle life cycle, recent studies have questioned the availability of material to make
fuels on a large scale.
Engineered plants conserve 25 percent more water by only partially opening their mouth - like stomata, allowing
less water to escape through transpiration while
carbon dioxide enters the plant to
fuel photosynthesis.
In a fossil
fuel - fired generator, this means
less carbon dioxide emissions for the same unit of electricity produced.
They envision zero -
carbon power plants that run on
fuel made from hydrogen isotopes in seawater and produce
less waste than today's nuclear power plants.
It produces
less carbon dioxide emissions than coal for electricity or gasoline and diesel for
fuel, but even a small amount of natural gas release — which is essentially methane — packs a greenhouse gas punch about 30 times more powerful than the same amount of
carbon dioxide.
Most of the needed policies will occur within countries, but some cooperative international efforts will be essential as well, such as new schemes to share technology or fund transitions to
less carbon - intensive
fuels.
If you need to emit
less carbon, you can change your process, you can change what
fuel you use, or you can find a company that you can pay to reduce those tons for you, which is what happens when you buy an offset.»
Because there is no combustion,
fuel cells run extremely cleanly: Their emissions are just water and
carbon dioxide, and they produce
less than half as much CO2 per kilowatt - hour as do traditional power plants.
It's also critical to a future
less dependent on foreign oil: Hydraulic fracturing, «clean coal» technologies, nuclear
fuel production, and
carbon storage (the keystone of the strategy to address climate change) all count on pushing waste into rock formations below the earth's surface.
The assessments shall reflect the relative
carbon dioxide emission rates of different fossil
fuel - based electricity, and initially shall be not
less than the following amounts for coal, natural gas, and oil:
Less commonly, countries spoke of reducing the use of inefficient coal - fired power plants, lowering methane emissions from oil and gas production, reforming fossil
fuel subsidies, and
carbon pricing, the report says.
Burning that
less carbon - intensive
fuel could prevent the emission of 0.5 to one billion tonnes of greenhouse gas, according to one study.
Recent expansions in green renewable power and
carbon offset credits enabled us to convert and transfer our previous dependency on non-renewable energy sources such as fossil
fuels and nuclear to a more sustainable and
less harmful energy source.
This suits me just fine since I train in small sessions throughout the day and I can't be bothered with using the car to get to the gym all the time (As an added advantage I consume
less fossil
fuel these days thus reducing the size of my
carbon footprint on the planet.
As well as cutting their
fuel bills,
LESS CO2 schools are also making significant
carbon savings, with schools in Devon and Cornwall reducing their CO2 emissions by over 300 tonnes over the course of the programme.
When run in Europe's standardized
fuel economy and emissions test cycle, the Flextreme is expected to produce
less than 60 grams of
carbon dioxide per mile.
«Gunk» is the
carbon deposit build - up on intake valves and
fuel injectors.Engines that have
carbon deposit build - up, or gunk, on intake valves and
fuel injectors, may work
less efficiently.
The greater your
fuel - efficiency, the
less your
carbon footprint.
And of course, the car is powered by a
fuel - efficient 2.0 - liter four - cylinder engine that will reduce
carbon emissions in a city that sorely needs
less pollution.
This 2017 MINI Clubman Cooper S is proudly offered by Mini Of Dutchess County The greater your
fuel - efficiency, the
less your
carbon footprint.
These touches contribute in improved
fuel economy, as well as
less carbon dioxide emissions.
Other models that might be unveiled are a new efficient diesel C - Class that will be on the market by 2011 that uses
less than five liters of
fuel per 100 km and only emits
less than 130g of
carbon - dioxide per km.
However, for those who are interested in paying substantially
less at the
fuel pump, and also doing their part to reduce
carbon emissions, there is the Escape Hybrid edition.
Although the new 3.0 - litre turbo - diesel V6 engine is
less powerful now, it uses significantly
less fuel, emits
less carbon dioxide and is Euro 6 compliant.
What's important here is that the LS 500h gives you access to a gorgeous, luxurious limousine that gulps
less fuel and emits
less carbon - dioxide.
* LOW MILES * * EXCELLENT
FUEL ECONOMY * * ONE OWNER * The greater your fuel - efficiency, the less your carbon footpr
FUEL ECONOMY * * ONE OWNER * The greater your
fuel - efficiency, the less your carbon footpr
fuel - efficiency, the
less your
carbon footprint.
Support companies
less dependent on fossil
fuels by overweighting their stocks relative to higher
carbon - emitting peers
The aircraft structure is made of lightweight
carbon fiber reinforced plastic, therefore, it uses 25 percent
less fuel and produces 25 percent
less fewer environmental damaging emissions.
... Based on these results, further warming and drying of tropical forests is expected to result in
less uptake and more release of
carbon on land, unfortunately amplifying the effect of fossil
fuel emissions warming the climate.
Libby's article speaks volumes about the difficulty of moving a world that is more than 80 percent dependent on fossil
fuels toward one largely free of
carbon dioxide emissions from such
fuels within two or three generations, even as the human population heads toward 9 billion (more or
less).
In the meantime, the world's poorest two or three billion people, emitting
less than one ton of
carbon dioxide per person per year (compared to the 20 tons per - capita average of the United States), could be propelled out of poverty with additional fossil
fuel use without substantially interfering with efforts to rein in the richest populations» emissions.
Significantly, now that our Legislature has passed a
carbon tax and Arnie signed it into law, we will approach some of the
lesser expensive European locales in terms of
fuel costs.
Natural
carbon sinks such as soils and forests that are not burned for
fuel, are
less likely to have unintended consequences.
But cleaner transport also means
less carbon emissions, both because buses are cleaner,
less fuel intensive per passenger mile, and because people are actually leaving their cars for the faster buses.