According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, nuclear energy produces four times
less carbon pollution per unit of energy than solar farms, 3.4 times less than solar roofs, three times less than geothermal, and half as much as hydroelectric dams.
Not exact matches
And although Alberta currently boasts a
carbon price of $ 15
per metric ton, it is not enough — at
less than a dollar
per barrel — to keep greenhouse gas
pollution from the tar sands in check.
The underlying motivation varies from buyer to buyer and usually involves one or more of these objectives: diminishing the demand for foreign oil, potentially releasing
less pollution and
carbon, saving money on cost
per mile, driving solo in carpool lanes and / or irritating friends and strangers with an air of superiority.
Wind was by far the most promising, Jacobson said, owing to a better - than 99 percent reduction in
carbon and air
pollution emissions; the consumption of
less than 3 square kilometers of land for the turbine footprints to run the entire U.S. vehicle fleet (given the fleet is composed of battery - electric vehicles); l the savings of about 15,000 lives
per year from premature air -
pollution - related deaths from vehicle exhaust in the United States; and virtually no water consumption.