Sentences with phrase «less commission amounts»

Not exact matches

if this is not possible, pay the total amount donated by the overseas person, or its value, less $ 1,500 to the Electoral Commission.

If an anonymous party donation exceeding $ 1,500 is received by a party secretary, the party secretary must, within 20 working days of receipt of the donation, pay to the Electoral Commission the amount of the donation, or its value, less $ 1,500.

However, if you are going to invest a large amount of money each time — say once a quarter — then the trading commission on an ETF becomes less of an issue.

Many Vanguard mutual funds have minimum initial investment amounts of $ 3,000, while it's completely possible to start investing in a corresponding ETF with less than $ 100, especially if you find one that's commission - free.

Although IRDA has in recent times streamlined quite a bit of it, there is still some amount that goes into commission, plus the returns from Annuity providers [the yearly payment you get after retirement] is less than what you get from FD's.

If the principal amount of a sale is less than the minimum commission charge, the commission will be adjusted so that the proceeds received will be the lesser of $ 2 or the value of the shares.

So if you buy a stock for $ 100 and sell it for $ 150 a few years later, your capital gain is $ 50 (less commissions or other expenses), and you have to pay tax on that amount.

From the chart, you can see that should we execute our strategy on a stock which runs from $ 20 / share to $ 227 7/8, we will have an open profit of $ 25,142, less the minimal amount of interest paid on the borrowed portion and commissions.

In less than two months, he landed a huge commission job with her for five times the amount of what he had invested with us.

The only real difference is that the arrangements are locked in for a shorter amount of time, and that the Productivity Commission will advise government on whether and when a shift to a principles - based system of industry assistance — which would likely mean less free money — should take place.

The Alberta Utilities Commission («AUC») can make rules prescribing which contraventions of AESO rules will be treated as less serious breaches subject to «specified penalties», and determining the amount and manner of calculating specified penalties, up to a maximum of $ 100,000 per day.

After extensive litigation and multiple settlement conferences, the case settled successfully for our client as our client paid less in commissions than the amounts stated in the written agreements with the brokers.

For Mutual Funds: The amount you pay for your shares, including commissions and any reinvested dividends or capital gain distributions, less any nontaxable distributions or returns of capital.

Reforms introduced were to keep an eye on the unrestricted charges and commissions which extracts the maximum amount of premium and allowing the lesser amount for investments for the policyholder.

This was due to exorbitant policy allocation and administration charges, agents getting hefty commission of 40 % for first 2 years and hence less amount available for investment.

The Competition Bureau of Canada couldn't care less whether or not someone failed to sell their home in a timely manner (which caused them to net less), or at all, because they only offered a $ 1.00 co-op commission, or some other pitiful amount — as the Bureau isn't at all accountable.

The only vision we had at that time was to increase the amount of commission we were paying to the agents who, in spite of our offering more, were leaving to go to higher - paying franchises that had been in Canada for less than 10 years.

For example, claims like: «Have your home SOLD on the Multiple Listing Service for less than a: few thousand dollars (flat rate)...» The problem with what I know of the aforesaid kind of claim, is that the amount of money mentioned is all for the Listing Broker and doesn't include anything in respect of the: cooperating brokerages commission, or selling commission — such being the case this is a pure come - on and a play on the innocent ignorance of consumers!

What the search portals do, however, is diminish the amount of an agent's commission, which equates to less service.

After entering the agreement with the seller, the licensee negotiated 0.5 % less commission for the buyer's representative, and added that amount to his commission.

All a consumer has to do is ask a REALTOR if they have charged other clients less than the amount of commission they are being asked to pay.

In addition, brokers must be willing to set a fixed fee or commission upfront and be willing to reduce that fee even more if the seller offers less than the negotiated amount.

The seller benefits of course from saving some money, I assume that the buyer agent would try to negotiate a commission from the sale throught the seller or conversly the buyer will offer a lesser amount, then he may have, inorder to cover his / her commission payable.

If ReferralExchange.com negotiates or receives payment that is less than two percent (2 %) of the gross sale price for a Qualified Transaction, or if ReferralExchange.com negotiates or receives payment that is less than thirty - five percent (35 %) of the gross referred side commission, then ReferralExchange.com will pay Referring Agent an amount equal to seventy one and four - tenths of one percent (71.4 %) of the amount actually received and recognized by ReferralExchange.com.