Literally the only traits Landry has an edge over Cooper in is that he has
less concentration drops, and he hasn't dealt with as many injuries (which could easily just be the luck of the draw so far, and isn't necessarily predictive of anything).
Not exact matches
Robin Kaplan: So yeah, so I think that's and again your babies getting hind milk even from that first
drop that they are taking, but the percentage of it compare to the fore milk is lower but then the throughout the feeding as your babies on there its higher hind milk
concentration, higher hind milk
concentration, and then towards end of the feeding it's kind of flip flops so there is more hind milk in there and
less fore milk, so as long your baby is draining the breast and draining it regularly whether you're at work and pumping or your babies is on you, you know throughout the day and night then your baby's is accessing all the fat content that they need as long as the ounces are kind of meeting their needs so...
Pregnant female lab mice received the brew in their drinking water at four
concentrations, from 400 parts per million (ppm) down to
less than 0.04 ppm — equivalent to one
drop of pesticide in 500 bathtubs of water, Porter says.
But I think it best to not lose sight of one pretty clear implication: You don't need to eliminate CO2 emissions for atmospheric
concentrations to start
dropping, and the higher the atmospheric
concentration reaches, the
less emissions need to
drop to see falling atmospheric
concentration.
He found that he got a 50 %
drop at 250 nM, 40 times
less than my
concentration; so who do you think is correct?
What would happen if atmospheric CO2
concentration dropped by half, say to
less than 200 ppm?