Across a variety of disciplines, professionals who graduate from higher - ranked schools begin their careers with
less debt relative to their income.
A low debt to equity ratio means lower risk to investors, since it means there is
less debt relative to the available equity.
It has
less debt relative to annual profits.
Not exact matches
«When house prices declined, ushering in the global financial crisis, many households saw their wealth shrink
relative to their
debt,» its authors observed, «and with
less income and more unemployment, found it harder to meet mortgage payments.»
That would make REITs
less attractive to investors
relative to bonds, while raising the cost of their
debts — cutting into profits.
In contrast, EM nations as a whole are carrying
less debt as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) than in years past, and thus the EMD index may have garnered
relative attraction among investors searching for yield.
The flip side of saving
less is borrowing more, as evidenced by the leap in all consumer
debt and
debt service, both in relation to disposable (after - tax) income and
relative to assets.
But
relative to public four - year institutions, the for - profits were
less able to get equivalent students through BA programs, and they left students in far greater
debt.
First, it's none of their business, but more importantly, if you mention you are getting a settlement, tax return, or borrowing money from
relatives, they may be unwilling to accept a
lesser amount and press you for the entire
debt.
As fixed claims grow
relative to equity claims, the economy becomes
less flexible, because many are counting on the
debts for which they are creditors to be paid back at par.
Others point out that because interest rates are so low, the
debt service payment on the national
debt (about $ 250 billion)
relative to the size of the economy is
less than it was throughout most of the past three decades — 1.6 percent of American output vs. 3 percent or more during the four administrations prior to Obama.
This screen looks for unpopular dividend - paying companies with low price - earnings and price - to - book ratios that are exhibiting positive earnings and have a reasonable amount of long - term
debt relative to net working capital (current assets
less current liabilities).
Unemployment rates remain lower and earnings remain higher for college graduates
relative to their
less - educated peers, even if the rise in overall
debt threatens to consume more and more of their income and savings over time.
In today's market it almost seems like the lawyer graduating from one of the more inexpensive schools (it's all
relative) and offering competent legal services for
less than the large law firms may be able to pay off their
debts, and create a profitable practice, before their peers who beeline directly to Big Law for their temporary stint there.
Debt overhang and ongoing deleveraging on the part of firms and households are the main culprits as well as higher structural unemployment and the stultifying double entendre of more or
less permanently high taxes and excessive regulation
relative to our economic competitors.