Sentences with phrase «less difference in temperature»

Less difference in temperature is undeniable.

Not exact matches

In such a case, the temperature differences between hot and cold regions are less likely to induce good convective flow, and so the hotspots can persist for a substantial time.

Rectal versus axillary temperatures: Is there a significant difference in infants less than 1 year of age?

So the mechanism should cause a decline in skin temperature gradients with increased cloud cover (more downward heat radiation), and there should also be a decline in the difference between cool skin layer and ocean bulk temperatures - as less heat escapes the ocean under increased atmospheric warming.

I have returned back to Helsinki and I must say that I was afraid if I was going to experience a big temperature shock since the difference in the weather is huge and we're talking about a whole 20 Celsius degrees less than it was in Croatia during my stay there.

In a condo, there are other condos surrounding you on one or more sides, so the temperature difference should be less and heating and cooling should be more efficient.

When differences in scaling between previous studies are accounted for, the various current and previous estimates of NH mean surface temperature are largely consistent within uncertainties, despite the differences in methodology and mix of proxy data back to approximately A.D. 1000... Conclusions are less definitive for the SH and globe, which we attribute to larger uncertainties arising from the sparser available proxy data in the SH.

Before allowing the temperature to respond, we can consider the forcing at the tropopause (TRPP) and at TOA, both reductions in net upward fluxes (though at TOA, the net upward LW flux is simply the OLR); my point is that even without direct solar heating above the tropopause, the forcing at TOA can be less than the forcing at TRPP (as explained in detail for CO2 in my 348, but in general, it is possible to bring the net upward flux at TRPP toward zero but even with saturation at TOA, the nonzero skin temperature requires some nonzero net upward flux to remain — now it just depends on what the net fluxes were before we made the changes, and whether the proportionality of forcings at TRPP and TOA is similar if the effect has not approached saturation at TRPP); the forcing at TRPP is the forcing on the surface + troposphere, which they must warm up to balance, while the forcing difference between TOA and TRPP is the forcing on the stratosphere; if the forcing at TRPP is larger than at TOA, the stratosphere must cool, reducing outward fluxes from the stratosphere by the same total amount as the difference in forcings between TRPP and TOA.

About taking differences (current period figures less prior period figures) of anomalies: the anomalies are the value less the monthly mean (i.e., the mean for the particular month over the years, in this case 32 full years), as is the usual practice with climate data (most notably temperature).

Based on the decrease in SO2 emissions in Europa, there should be a huge difference in temperature increase between less polluted areas and more polluted areas, downwind from the main sources.

This head difference may be caused by density, temperature, wind and / or coriollis effects, but never the less every element is moved by the relative position of the immediately adjacent elements in the stream.

IMHO, the increase in speed of the Hadley / Walker cells may be the result of higher ocean temperatures (or temperature differences over long distances), not the origin (or to a lesser extent, as less clouds lead to some extra insolation, thus warming).

If you have less pressure, there would greater difference in temperature.

If you compare the graphs, both follow more or less the temperature variability and there is little difference in performance.

Since 1659, the linear trend in summer temperatures has been +0.0009 degrees Celsius per year (they went up in about 1995 - 2005 and are now declining again) and for winter temperatures, the trend is +0.0037 degrees Celsius per year (with an increase from about 1995 - 2010, followed by a decline) so the difference (summer minus winter temperatures) is in fact becoming less extreme by 0.0028 degrees Celsius per year.

This logical deduction is based on the fact that there is nowhere on the Earths surface where the difference in the summer maximum and winter minimum temperatures is less than any temperature change resulting from the addition of «green house gasses».

As for the amount of the bet, look at the paleontological evidence for when temperatures were about 3 C higher than preindustrial levels, find the difference in sea levels, call it a conservative 1 meter, now total the world property values for the land that is less than 1 meter above sea level and see how much that is.

These can not — and will not — destabilize the atmosphere to start up convection, because they always move net heat in the direction that makes convection even less likely, given that convection is driven by temperature differences that conduction or radiation further reduce.

So it's all gases at greatest density will be doing the same thing around the planet at the same time (*) and as these change with differences in density in the play between gravity and pressure and kinetic and potential from greatest near the surface to more rarified, less dense and absent any kinetic to write home about the higher one goes, then, energy conservation intact, the hotter will rise and cool because losing kinetic energy means losing temperature, thus cooling they which began with the closest in density and kinetic energy as a sort of band of brothers near the surface will rise and cool at the same time whereupon they'll all come down together colder but wiser that great heights don't make for more comfort and giving up their heat will sink displacing the hotter now in their place when they first went travelling.

The net result is that in the lower troposphere, the temperature difference between low and high latitudes decreases as the planet warms, creating less wind shear.

Pre-war temperature also has the potential for being noisier because the sampling covered less of the globe so is more prone to confluences situations where they drive cooling / warming in the observed locations and the opposite in the non-observed locations (cf the difference between HadCRUT3 and GISTEMP).

When CO2 rises, the imbalance rises, but as the climate responds with a rising temperature, that imbalance is partially restored toward its earlier value, and so the magnitude of the driving force for warming will always be less than the magnitude of the difference in CO2 levels.

The TSI reconstruction with lesser variation shows a decrease in global temperature of around 0.09 °C while the stronger variation in solar forcing shows a difference of around 0.3 °C.

The difference in trend between global SST and global land air temperature since 1976 does not appear to be significant, but the trend in NMAT (despite any residual data problems) does appear to be less than that in the land air temperature since 1976.

These differences reveal that the modelled ice sheets are less susceptible to change in response to global temperature variation than our δ18O analysis.

All that is needed is to add heat carried upwards past the denser atmosphere (and most CO2) by convection and the latent heat from water changing state (the majority of heat transport to the tropopause), the albedo effects of clouds, the inability of long wave «downwelling» (the blue balls) to warm water that makes up 2 / 3rds of the Earth's surface, and that due to huge differences in enthalpy dry air takes far less energy to warm than humid air so temperature is not a measure of atmospheric heat content.

From 1910 to approximately 1950 there are small differences — generally less than 0.2 °C — in annual - mean Australian temperatures between adjusted and unadjusted datasets.

After all, this rise in temperature is less than the average daily temperature difference between New York City and Atlanta, Georgia, or between Paris and Naples, and there is little evidence of greater risk to people who now live in the warmer southern climate.

Schwartz (2004) notes that the intermodel spread in modeled temperature trend expressed as a fractional standard deviation is much less than the corresponding spread in either model sensitivity or aerosol forcing, and this comparison does not consider differences in solar and volcanic forcing.

The difference between cycles and the emissions is that the latter is a one - way process, the former are two - way processes, which are more or less in equilibrium after a full cycle, except for temperature influences.

Now, if you reduce the surface temperature of 265K by an amount that's enough to fill in the hole at 15um (and the other smaller holes in CO2's lesser absorption bands) to make a smooth blackbody curve at a lower temperature the downward difference is the amount of greenhouse effect by all atmospheric CO2.

Since annual land surface temperatures are on average less than sea surface temperatures, the temperature difference between land and ocean is decreasing, not increasing, but don't let the facts get in the way of your evaluation.

This difference in temperature, less weather noise, would obviously be a reflection of the trend.

While theoretically lowering the temperature can make the immune system less effective, it does not seem to make much, if any, difference in how quickly a child becomes well again.