Sentences with phrase «less freedom for»

So, when Tim Cook unveiled the iPhone X at the Apple event, many complained about the design and the long - standing boring look of iOS with their regular grid of icons and Android fans kept waging a war with points to lack of customization and less freedom for users.

Whether it's global warming, cooling, the ozone hole, acid rain, or any of the other myriad climate doomsday predictions (which NEVER come true) the proposed «solution» is always the same: More money and more power for politicians, and higher taxes and less freedom for ordinary people.

That will lead to less creativity in the classroom and less freedom for teachers to adjust their lessons on the fly, based on wherever the class discussion happens to go.

Thus different schools allow more or less freedom for informed opinion.

Not exact matches

Freedom of choice is a lot less empowering when you have to hitch up a wagon and ride for two days to get it.

Even if Le Pen wins, she'd likely have less freedom to act than President Trump, who has signed a number of executive orders calling for sweeping changes.

«America First» is a bad deal for everyone The death of liberal world order leaves the world less prosperous, less peaceful, less freeRichard N. Haass argues that the post-war liberal world order has collapsed, threatening global peace, prosperity and freedom.

For this reason, the Wildrose Alliance will fight for less tax, a smaller, more responsive government, principled values and the freedom to develop Alberta as economic leader.&raqFor this reason, the Wildrose Alliance will fight for less tax, a smaller, more responsive government, principled values and the freedom to develop Alberta as economic leader.&raqfor less tax, a smaller, more responsive government, principled values and the freedom to develop Alberta as economic leader.»

But this week, Suzan Johnson Cook resigned as ambassador - at - large for international religious freedom less than two years into the job.

And, in a very strange reinterpretation of American history, Huckabee declared, «I believe America is an exceptional country created out of the providence of God because of the prayers of people who, on their knees, begged for a place where they could be free and raise their children in the freedom to worship and to speak out and to protest, and where every person was equal to every other person in intrinsic value and worth and no person was worth more or worth less because of how much land they owned, what their last name was, what their occupation was and what their bloodline was.»

Under these conditions, holding up the banner of the Protestant Reformation is less about affirming the theology of Italian Reformed Protestants (as de Chirico's commentary implies) and more about past issues over religious freedom for Pentecostals who had only been in Italy for twenty years in 1928.

But the stronger the rational proof of revelation's facticity, the less room was left for freedom and grace.

As people depend less and less upon the regime, they have more freedom to think for themselves politically.

The paganism of American culture is less obvious, for we do not have to contend with a government that suppresses religious freedom or harasses religious leaders.

For what this truly and blessedly means is that God can not be less than man, endowed with personality, freedom und love, and that the mystery itself is free protective love, not an «objective order» which one can, after all, possess (at least in principle), and against which one could ensure oneself.

To suggest, then, that religious believers (much less majorities who, qua majorities, also have a second claim on shaping public policy) are «wards» depending on the Constitution for their religious freedom and its scope is, to use Posner and Segall's words against them, «to turn the Constitution upside down when it comes to government and religion.»

Accordingly, since it is always possible for such freedom to be used in less than the most appropriate manner, process theists deny that God could unilaterally have produced a world with no evil.

This modification of materialist physicalism provides one of the elements necessary to allow for freedom in human beings (and, to a lesser extent, other animals).

After years of participating in a comfortable faith tradition, many find themselves in a spiritual wilderness, feeling disillusioned with church, longing for more freedom and less religion in their lives.

In every sphere, physical no less than intellectual and moral, and whether it be a question of flowing water, a traveler on a journey, or a thinker or mystic engaged in the pursuit of truth, there inevitably comes a point in time and place when the necessity presents itself, to mechanical forces, or to our freedom of choice, of deciding once and for all which of two paths is the one to take.

«A freedom open to new creation is in fact less centered on subjectivity, on personal authenticity, than on social and political justice; it calls for a reconciliation which itself demands to be inscribed in the recapitulation of all things.

However, as we look around today and ask what conditions seem on the whole to make for happiness in marriage, we are driven to the curious conclusion that the more «civilized people become the less capable they seem of lifelong happiness with one partner» (p. 135) For a marriage to work requires that there «be a feeling of complete equality on both sides; there must be no interference with mutual freedom; there must be the most complete physical and mental intimacy; and there must be a certain similarity in regard to standards of value» (p. 14for happiness in marriage, we are driven to the curious conclusion that the more «civilized people become the less capable they seem of lifelong happiness with one partner» (p. 135) For a marriage to work requires that there «be a feeling of complete equality on both sides; there must be no interference with mutual freedom; there must be the most complete physical and mental intimacy; and there must be a certain similarity in regard to standards of value» (p. 14For a marriage to work requires that there «be a feeling of complete equality on both sides; there must be no interference with mutual freedom; there must be the most complete physical and mental intimacy; and there must be a certain similarity in regard to standards of value» (p. 143).

There is another brand of Porcher, though, that is less enthusiastic about giving people the freedom to make choices for themselves.

Just for those who might take his «argumentation» seriously, describing the wish that everyone would see the same truth as you do is at least a wish for less freedom., even if that is not accompanied with an actual attempt to minimize other people's freedoms.

This view gives less scope than Whitehead's does for the integrity and freedom of a plurality of individual agents.

The US is a secular country not a christian country.Our country was founded on the principles of freedom fo religion and seperation between church and state.I am a muslim, I can tell you that the reason men and women don; t pray in integrated environments is to avoid distractions and to focus on the prayer not because women are less than men.I personally don; t want to be praying next to a woman because all I'll be thinking about is her and not god.Jews also do the same thing in temples by seperating between men and women in temples.A house of worship is built solely for that purpose, worship!

For without the freedom that comes with an open information environment, human beings are pressed into fear and neurosis that makes them less than human, and makes our society less than it should be.

The earliest rule by the elders of the community and the essentially democratic freedom inherited from nomad society would seem to imply a respect for inherited custom and some more or less crude sense of justice.

A less than optimal and still agreeable scenario involves the inclusion of Hanukkah cookies at a class party or even a Hanukkah song at the school's chorus program — usually a previously unknown and completely forgettable musical composition — which, of course, emphasizes the ancient Maccabees» struggle for freedom of religion.

«In most of the games we had 70 percent possession, but that makes it difficult for the strikers because there is less room and less freedom as well as most of the time people play with central defenders.

«I don't know if the most effective way is to sit down during the national anthem with a country that's providing you freedom, providing you $ 16 million a year... when there are black minorities that are dying in Iraq and Afghanistan for less than $ 20,000 a year.»

But it also mocks the imposed engine limit and penalty system, and could create a scenario in which half the grid is taking penalties for freedom of development, leaving the few teams happy with their output to continue, with no choice offered to the lesser financed teams.

Considering we have Trump, his GOP, and the ghouls he appointed to Attorney General and the FCC chair, it's probably a great investment for rich cocksuckers looking for a windfall from more freedom ™ less regulation and increased incarceration.

But Hannah Arendt (in her typically gloomy fashion) believes this precious treasure can hardly be named, much less collectively held, for she declares that no past tradition exists in which this public freedom is embedded, one that can preserve and transmit this revolutionary force from generation to generation.

Mayor Bloomberg's proposed plan to limit the sale of soda and other sugary drinks to containers that are 16 ounces or less has drawn national attention, been widely criticized by editorial boards and columnists, and has made him a target for attacks from several groups including the Center for Consumer Freedom which ran an full page ad in the New York Times.

It's less about society providing for a basic right as much as restricting their ability to deprive someone of their basic rights (freedom / liberty) without meeting certain standards.

Socialistic tend to share a Marxist PoV just with less of an oomph and more economic freedom for the individual.

Similarly, Bethany Lesser, a spokesperson for Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D - N.Y.), also told the Blade her boss, the Senator, supports the plank as written by Freedom to Marry.

Almost everything that we value — individual worth, care for others less fortunate, the rule of law, personal freedom and so on — flows from that heritage.

LP News, the national party's publication of record, has been there to celebrate its victories, accomplishment, strategies, and hopes for much less government, more freedom and peace.

Despite campaigning for the living wage to be paid in the public sector and for zero - hours contracts to be scrapped, Freedom of Information requests have shown that all three of the councils controlled or led by Plaid Cymru — Ceredigion, Conwy, and Gwynedd - pay people less than the living wage and use zero - hours contracts.

«If our losses today are part - payment for every family that is more secure because of a job we helped create, every person with depression who is treated with the compassion they deserve, every child who does a little better in school, every apprentice with a long and rewarding career to look forward to, every gay couple who know their love is worth no less than everyone else's, and every pensioner with a little more freedom and dignity in retirement, then I hope our losses can be endured with a little selfless dignity.»

Former Gov. George Pataki, who is reportedly toying yet again with a White House run, is hitting the airwaves with a new TV ad that slams Washington and calls for a «new America» with less government, and «more freedom.»

Going forward the balance must veer towards greater freedom for the individual and less power for all the many organs of the state.

And if such a scenario doesn't happen — and Governments implode far less often than frustrated oppositions hope — will any of the new Labour leaders have the imagination and charisma (leaving aside freedom from past «baggage») to build positive electoral enthusiasm for Labour, in the manner for which John F Kennedy provides the paradigm case?»

A bit radical, he's for collecting phone data and monitoring mosques, stating that (more or less) «preaching anything jihad isn't in our freedom of speech, so we should listen in to make sure nothing is happening.»

In the city in which John Peter Zenger fought for and helped establish freedom of the press, we can do no less.»

One is to locate intangible property for tax purposes where the person making the intangible property payment is located rather than where the person who is entitled to receive the intangible property payment is located, because the person making the payment often has less freedom to change their location and is often more closely associated with the production of the income.

The Bronx Freedom Fund has leveraged its revolving bail fund to post bail for low - income Bronx residents facing a misdemeanor case where bail is set at $ 2000 or less.

Abbott has previously dismissed calls for greater immigration controls, saying: «The people that complain about freedom of movement will not be satisfied because what they really want is to see less foreign looking people on their streets.»