Sentences with phrase «less freedom of»

There's no reason to think that bigger Government, higher taxes, higher cost of goods, and less freedom of movement isn't a solution to living on Earth with our potential new weather and climate challenges.

It plays out as a bullet hell shooter, but with more freedom of fire and less freedom of movement than those games usually allow - Savant has only limited ability to dodge incoming fire, but can aim in a full 360 degree arc to take on his foes.

«The better the parochial school,» said Justice Stephen Breyer, «the less the freedom of choice....

The major differences between approaches can be understood by asking, Does the delivery model allow families more or less freedom of choice when picking a childcare provider?

It also have to do with limited real democracy, more corruption, less freedom of press et.c.

Less freedom of food choice in our public schools or places like NYC.

Not exact matches

Freedom of choice is a lot less empowering when you have to hitch up a wagon and ride for two days to get it.

That revelation provoked an uproar among privacy advocates, and Congress eventually reacted by replacing parts of the U.S.A. Patriot Act, which authorized the privacy - invasive program, with a seemingly - less - intrusive piece of legislation, the U.S.A. Freedom Act, over the summer.

You will never feel satisfied with money alone, it's what money can do, namely help those less fortunate, take care of your loved ones, allow you geographical freedom, that really does satisfy you.

Unlike corporations, charged individuals stand to be deprived of both personal wealth and freedom, and are thus less likely to strike a plea bargain.

We are no more - and no less - heroic than the suffragists and abolitionists of the 19th century; and the labor organizers, Freedom Riders, Stonewall demonstrators, and environmentalists of the 20th century.

When they do choose to exercise their freedom and work outside the office, they find they suffer as second - class citizens in the shadows of their less inventive and more conservative colleagues.

«Even though Del Ponte gave his team members the freedom to be slightly less productive than usual in terms of hitting up their to - do lists, he was surprised to find that they actually reported increases in their productivity.

Even if Le Pen wins, she'd likely have less freedom to act than President Trump, who has signed a number of executive orders calling for sweeping changes.

«America First» is a bad deal for everyone The death of liberal world order leaves the world less prosperous, less peaceful, less freeRichard N. Haass argues that the post-war liberal world order has collapsed, threatening global peace, prosperity and freedom.

In our engagement with China in Canada, respecting Canada's sovereignty and traditions is no less essential and calls us to uphold principles of intellectual freedom, civil society, and human rights through enforcement of our legal and regulatory standards.

Yet an unimaginative approach that seeks to regulate the Internet imposes costs that would make Internet access less affordable and create a regulatory environment that runs counter to fundamental principles of freedom of speech and access to information.

The result of not allowing to people to act voluntarily is less freedom and decreased «utility».

In one study of a fundamentalist Protestant academy (Bethany Bible Academy), a Jewish intellectual found the Bethany students more tolerant on issues of race, religion and freedom of speech and less concerned with making a lot of money than their public school peers.

And, in a very strange reinterpretation of American history, Huckabee declared, «I believe America is an exceptional country created out of the providence of God because of the prayers of people who, on their knees, begged for a place where they could be free and raise their children in the freedom to worship and to speak out and to protest, and where every person was equal to every other person in intrinsic value and worth and no person was worth more or worth less because of how much land they owned, what their last name was, what their occupation was and what their bloodline was.»

This broader understanding of what we seek to defend should make social conservatives both more and less political than we have tended to be: We should be more political in that we do more than occasionally resort to legal appeals to protect our own freedom of action.

So often it appears that the more of what I become is determined by God, the less is determined by me in my freedom and responsibility.

The freedom and privacy of the few strongest and cleverest are bought at the price of the enslavement of the many less able.

Since religious freedom is based on the inherent dignity of the human person there is no question of it permitting the treatment of individuals to be based on the view that some are of a lesser dignity than others.

I receive a full time salary from the church (less than $ 84k), but much of the freedom that you have described as a benefit I feel I experience, because I know if tomorrow things changed radically, I have my hands and my tools, and my knowledge.

But to be able to see that maximal power is the power to offer greater, not less, freedom to the other — in short, to empower — is the hallmark of power that involves a mutuality of relatedness.

In a world where any actuality has some degree of freedom, pursues its own actualization of beauty and value, creatures can misuse their freedom, work at crosspurposes, and choose to actualize lesser, less inclusive values.

This alone is an element of freedom and democracy in the fundamental essence of the Church which does not, indeed, render the question of democracy in the Church superfluous, but which makes it much less vital, as is also the case in other free associations.

When I read this, about 15 years ago, I was stunned that God wanted His people to use the tithe to celebrate with our families and to help the less financially «properous» people (instead of judging them) I had such mixed feelings, of freedom and joy in God but also a kind of betrayal from what has been taught, almost to scare us.

The less successful it is (Or we think it is) in interfering with our freedom (i.e., satisfaction of our wants), the less we resent it.

Under these conditions, holding up the banner of the Protestant Reformation is less about affirming the theology of Italian Reformed Protestants (as de Chirico's commentary implies) and more about past issues over religious freedom for Pentecostals who had only been in Italy for twenty years in 1928.

God was not clearly thought of as supreme originative freedom sympathetically cherishing the creatures who were lesser forms of originative freedom sympathizing with their fellows.

Supreme, divine freedom, directs the performance of countless forms of lesser freedom; the supreme agent with supreme appreciation enjoys the performance, including the varied experiences and satisfactions of the performers as they perform.

But here is the mystery and freedom of God's way in election: the lesser vehicle, Jacob - Israel, bears the promise and the blessing.

But the opinion fails to explain why restraint» even a «non-onerous» restraint» of a freedom already being exercised is less objectionable.

Our calling is to invite all to turn from gods which are even less than human, and from idols like power, profit, property, creed, class, caste, language, race, success, technocratic progress, managerial efficiency and the ego, and thus experience the fulfilling realization of God's Reign which consists in justice, freedom and fellowship, tender love, universal compassion and equitable sharing of resources.

A truer and more truly «performative» attention to «the nature of practice itself» (Growth of the Liberal Soul 289) would be less inclined to praise pure freedom or openness and more solicitous of the actual horizons of common worlds, including implicit metaphysical and hierarchical elements.

is freedom of the will a sign of a greater or lesser being?

It's life in an environment we used our knowledge and freedom to domesticate — or make less alien or unfriendly — with each of our lives, liberty, and even happiness in mind.

I agree but add: God had no alternative to willing that there be some free creatures, first because (pace Alston) the idea of not creating at all could occur (if I may say so) only to a confused creature, second because, as Peirce, Bergson, and Whitehead have seen, by a «creature» we can consistently mean only a lesser form of the freedom or creativity which in eminent form is deity.

In «The Gospel of Yes» Mike Glenn shows the Gospel is giving us greater freedom, joy, satisfaction, and fulfillment in this life; not less.

Having gone into both Afghanistan and Iraq with the full force of American might, Bush dedicated his second inaugural address, in January 2005, to articulating a «Freedom Agenda» that in its moral passion and political scope was no less breathtaking than the Kennedy inaugural:

Mainly, because in all the verbiage about freedoms of beliefs there is something so important, so blatantly acute yet everyone do not even mention it, except - oh genial me: Why would anyone in the whole world support any type of creed / belief / religion where a whole lot of humans — as in millions of human women — are not allowed to go to school, to even just read and write - less become a teacher, doctor, lawyer, president of their own companies, their own countries, mutilated by the millions when they reach puberty, WHY is this allowed?

@michael of michigan yeah right, you would not give up your car and house to your neighbor nor your freedom, more or less going to Iran or Afghanistan to preach gospel.

But that freedom is just one of many that we enjoy in the United States — and religious tolerance is no more, or less, valuable than are rights to free speech, to bear arms, to be free from search and seizure, to be presumed innocent until proven otherwise, to be tried by our peers, to have our day in court, to not be imprisoned or fined without cause, to ensure State's rights, to be free from slavery and involuntary servitude, and on, and on, and on.

The sense of the presence of the other involves a feeling of the concrete actuality of the other, of being truly present to another, of being less concerned to shape and control the other, of letting the other be himself in his concrete freedom.

More of your own soul dies if you think that the call is anything less than to come pick up a cross and die into the freedom living given.

Even with God, that is, supreme and cosmic freedom, whereas ours are only more - or - less - good and localized forms of freedom, the forms of life are all forms of freedom.

Job, Plato, and the Greater and lesser Commandments are my basic traditional assumptions, together with the new freedom in science to admit self - activity as the index of mentality or the psychical.

Nothing less than this is the meaning of Protestant freedom.