Sentences with phrase «less fuel than»

We used the Toyota Prius because it burns less fuel than gasoline - engine counterparts.

One empty seat saves a lot less fuel than that.

We're also modernizing our fleet as we await our Trent 1000 - powered 787 - 9 Dreamliners that will burn 20 percent less fuel than the planes they replace.

They use less fuel than regular hybrids, but don't get much respect By Harry Stoffer Automotive News / March 28, 2005, p. 24

We burn less fuel than any other boat.

No other kind of vehicle can carry as many people or as much cargo, plus they sip less fuel than most full - size SUVs.

Infrared cooking results in juicier steaks, prevents flare - ups and uses less fuel than conventional grilling systems, the company says.

Amazing and it uses considerably less fuel than my wife's previous vehicle, an Infinity G37 coupe, which ran on premium only.

All engines feature direct fuel injection, and consume 15 percent less fuel than their respective predecessors.

«With the new 2017 911 Carrera 4 and 911 Targa 4 models, the traction advantage courtesy of an enhanced all - wheel drive system is paired with innovative turbocharged engines that are more powerful and consume less fuel than their predecessors.»

We had to take less fuel than the No. 3 car but the pressure was on the guys to execute on that final stop and they did an amazing job.

Rated at 469 metric horsepower and 700 Nm (516 lb - ft) of torque the new engine is said to burn eight percent less fuel than its 4.7 - liter predecessor thanks to the cylinder shut - off function.

The new Mercedes - AMG C 63 consumes around 32 percent less fuel than its direct predecessor with the 6.3 - litre V8 naturally aspirated engine — while delivering even more performance and the emotional sound that is a signature of the AMG V8.

My Volt, which doesn't get the gas MPG of any Prius, goes far enough on battery that I use less fuel than any car in the Prius lineup, despite the Prius» higher gas MPG rating.

Yet despite its fun - to - drive nature, the new MZR 2.0 - litre uses 4 percent less fuel than the outgoing 2.0 - litre, which means lower operating costs on a daily basis.

While output has increased by around 10 per cent and maximum torque is up by more than 30 per cent, the new BMW M5 burns over 30 per cent less fuel than its predecessor.

The top model in the new E-Class diesel range is the six - cylinder E 350 CDI with an output of 170 kW / 231 hp, which uses 0.5 litres per 100 kilometres less fuel than the previous E 320 CDI.

In addition to bumping up their power per liter output, DI increases fuel efficiency and, along with the newly optimized standard 7 - speed automatic transmission (the 7G - tronic plus), the new Cs consume anywhere from 5 to 15 percent less fuel than their predecessors.

The outstanding safety and comfort of the E-Class are matched by its environmental compatibility and economy: the four - and six - cylinder engines are direct - injection units, and consume up to 23 percent less fuel than before.

Quick in a straight line, the Golf also used less fuel than the other two cars.

Whether in front - wheel - drive or all - wheel - drive form, the new CR - V officially uses less fuel than any of its compact crossover competitors.

Audi says the new R18 e-tron quattro will use up to 30 percent less fuel than the predecessor, thanks to the updated V6 TDI engine and ERS - K Energy Recovery System Kinetic.

New V8 bi-turbo engine in the S 560 Coupe and Cabriolet models Claimed to be one of the world's most ecomomical V8 petrol engines, the latest - generation bi-turbo V8 is said to consume 8 % less fuel than its predecessor (with average fuel consumption of around 35mpg in the Coupe and 34mpg in the Cabrio), thanks partially to active cylinder shutdown.

Similar improvements in performance have also been done to the JCW — the car now does 0 - 100 km / h in 6.9 seconds, 80 - 120 km / h in 7.6 seconds and 229 km / h, all while sipping less fuel than before (combined, it uses 7.1 litres per 100 km).

For 1995, the cars cost less, weigh less and use less fuel than previous models.

It's expected the engine would be turbocharged to meet performance targets and would use 8 — 12 % less fuel than the current six - cylinder engines found in Porsche's two entry level models.

While some BMW purists may forwn at the news that the 1 Series now features three - cylinder engine borrowed from MINI, the fact that the model now has a version that uses less fuel than a purpose - built hybrid does say a lot.

This means that despite a higher level of engine and driving performance, all four models consume significantly less fuel than the previous models; total savings for individual versions are as much as 16 per cent.

And it's also one that just so happens to burn less fuel than a Honda Civic does on the highway.

The Cayenne engines have been optimized to consume less fuel than the previous - gen while offering improved performance.

The six - liter TDI uses significantly less fuel than any competing gasoline engine in the high - performance SUV sector; thanks to efficient combustion and the complex exhaust emission control system, the Audi Q7 V12 TDI quattro already complies with future emissions standards.

At the same time, it consumes significantly less fuel than corresponding six - cylinder engines (for more technical details see page 6).

Thanks to the car start / stop function, sailing function and, of course, the seventh gear, the DCT also contributes to the fact that the MINI One and MINI Cooper D consume noticeably less fuel than in combination with the previously used six - speed automatic transmission — whether as a three - door, five - door or convertible.

At the same time, it consumes significantly less fuel than a corresponding six - cylinder engine.

All while burning less fuel than an AMG A45 lapping the same circuit.

Thanks to a series of detailed improvements, the four - cylinder engines now burn up to seven percent less fuel than previously, and distinguish themselves with remarkably low exhaust emissions that undercut the current EU limits by as much as 90 percent.

The smaller engine uses 14 percent less fuel than the two - liter unit, and therefore also produces less CO2 emissions.

The new 1.7 CDTI turbo - diesel (81 kW / 110 hp and 92 kW / 125 hp) consumes seven percent less fuel than the 1.9 - liter unit (74 kW / 100 hp and 88 kW / 120 hp).

[2][9][10] When used in the latest Golf with the 90 kilowatts (122 PS; 121 hp) engine, this new seven - speed DSG uses roughly 6 % (5.9 l / 100 km for the seven - speed DSG compared to 6.3 l / 100 km with the six - speed manual gearbox) less fuel than the same engine with a manual transmission [9] and up to 20 % less than a conventional automatic transmission.

Ford claims the 2017 Raptor will consume 23 percent less fuel than the previous model Raptor, thanks largely to its weight reduction, new 10 - speed transmission, and smaller turbocharged V6 engine.

The Sprinter 2500 is powered by a 2 - stage turbocharged engine that provides ample low end torque for moving the heaviest loads, and burns less fuel than comparably powerful gas engines.

It can also mean there is less fuel than usual such as a weak fuel pressure, dirty fuel injectors, bad O2 giving computer a bad reading so fuel is lessened, bad engine coolant temperature sensor giving computer a hot reading so fuel is lessened.

A 3.0 - liter turbocharged V - 6 will serve as primary motivation for the Q4, Q5, and Q6 and should burn twenty percent less fuel than the current supercharged version of that engine.

Stable combustion is achieved by using less fuel than conventional direct injection engines which have an air - fuel ratio of 40:1.

It is a luxurious and safe S - class that offers superior driving performance while at the same time consuming less fuel than current compacts,» said Dr. Dieter Zetsche, Chairman of Daimler.

MPG and running costs - Diesel models are competitive with rivals in terms of economy, while the petrol 55 TFSI should use a little less fuel than its closest petrol competition.

Which is why a 200HP turbo car uses less fuel than a 200HP non-turbo.

Hence, if the engine «believes» the coolant to be a different temperature than it is, it will put in more or less fuel than required, resulting in a faulty air / fuel ratio and potentially more CO emissions.

Of course, the six - cylinder slurps less fuel than its V - 8 sibling (17/23 mpg versus 13/19 mpg), but gas mileage is likely not a primary concern for Range Rover buyers.

Low fuel pressure can cause the injectors to drip fuel instead of spray it and of course the engine will have less fuel than it needs.