Isn't a justified liberal response to this that if you have evidence that gun liberalisation in your society would lead to more not
less gun crime, than gun control is a legitimate liberal response?
Not exact matches
NYC 25 yr
gun - related violence decline, continuing this year, clearly shows that fewer
guns have resulted in dramatically
less gun related violence of all types, much as the 10 yr ban on assault weapons lowered
crime involving that weapon,» Bratton wrote.
But hey since the average time to
crime rate per the ATF in the US is 14 years, the number of felons buying their firearms from licensed dealers continues to fall 1994 14 % to 2008 5.96 %, and the poster child of all
gun control laws is enforced
less than 1 % of the time, alowing all but 13,024 felons out of just under 1 million of those rejected to go free and acquire their firearms from an unlicensed source is such startling evidence of how INEFFECTIVE our legal system is.
The researchers also analyzed studies exploring the effects of an amendment of the
Gun Control Act of 1968 and the add - on sentencing laws adopted by a number of states during the 1970s and 1980s, which added prison time to
crimes committed with a
gun rather than a
less lethal weapon.
John Lott used the fake persona of Mary Rosh to anonymously defend his own work and post reviews of his book More
Guns,
Less Crime [2].
Hardline's shift towards
crime grants the SP an opportunity to carve a different and perhaps
less OTT path, dialing back the excess; as well as recreating the tense
gun battles of Michael Mann films.
Total
crime, as well as assaults with and without a
gun, was
less after the greening.
I agree that pointing a
gun at someone is a
lesser crime than shooting at someone (if unjustified), what I meant is that there is no situation when pointing the
gun at someone would be completely legal but shooting wouldn't.