Sentences with phrase «less injuries for»

NB: AW will never resign hed rather wait to get fired, which also will never happen so we are stuck with him for the next coupla years.So for your healths sake enjoy the rest of the wins we can chalk up, hope for fourth place, and pray for quick recovery and less injuries for our players.AND THAT IS BEING REALISTIC.

It resulted in more productivity, less injuries for people and better quality of birds.»

The less injury for us and the more «gunners» returning to action from injury is welcoming news indeed towards the arsenal cause!

Not exact matches

It can also occur when there is a less - severe injury where the bleeding is slower — usually resulting in the condition going unnoticed for weeks.

Still less does being ethical mean never permitting any agency to bring injury to anyone; for not permitting this might be possible — owing to the division of power — only at the cost of greater injury through interference with other powers.

It seems that we avoid extending forgiveness for several reasons: first, we worry that we may be opening floodgates, acceding to future injury poured in upon past wrong (although, as C.S. Lewis noted, «there is all the difference in the world between forgiving and excusing»), and, second, less commendably, we hesitate to surrender outrage.

If, e.g., as sometimes happens, the man, after a time, more or less, recovers the faculties of which the injury to his brain had deprived him, and that not in consequence of a renewal of the injured part, but in consequence of the inhibited functions being performed by the vicarious action of other parts, the easiest explanation certainly is that, after a time, consciousness constitutes the remaining parts into a mechanism capable of acting as a substitute for the lost parts.

If she gets hurt, she is no more and no less responsible than any young man wrestling would be for his own injuries.

he is a ddecent striker but then why haven't have the likes of spuds / chelski or liverlool gone for him we need a top striker + he is also injury prone missed many games for nufc last season there is areason why marilelle sold him for less money

Personally I'm more interested to see two things happen this season which will put us on a better course to challenge for the title: tactical variation and less injuries.

then add to it an instant return to form and potency after such Lengthy injury is not a guaranteed one...... it may take more time for him to recover, it may take less.....

Despite the huge funds, star players and more or less an injury free squad, we still have the exact problems that have dogged us for years.

for more reason then one i think we probably lose this one it might help with the rest of the season less games = less injuries, and also i think some people are forgetting that Southampton are second in the league they wont be a push over and they will go with full squad to our youth.

There are other factors too — his wrist injury, his insistence on playing for Great Britain in the Olympics despite said injury — but none of that would matter if Deng made less money.

On top of this, the smaller clubs seem to get less injuries, whether it's lower expectations, less intensive training, less games etc etc I think this can only be a good thing for Jack.

remember the season when he had less injury and saw what he did for us with a lot of goals and assists.

Defensive coordinator Ken Norton Jr. was fired during the season for producing roughly the same results from the year before, though whatever drop - off there was is explainable by being less fortunate with takeaways (14 after getting 30 last season) and injuries.

Welbeck can more or less forget about playing an important role for next season as a result of his injury.

If Man City do come in with a bid and we can manage to milk them for all we can get then maybe we should go for it and use the tidy sum to buy a less injury prone player.

We don't know if this would have any effect on Wenger's team selection for the Swans but I suspect it might make him a bit more likely to hand some game time to some lesser used players or those coming back from injury.

Merely being less injury prone than these two men of glass is hardly a proper reason for wanting a severely limited player to be kept.

The good thing about arsenal there is a lot of room for improvement, Cazorla looking a little better although missing opportunities, ox getting better, ramsay slowly coming back, injuries getting less and a patch up defense doing its job.

Rob Holding was bought for 2 million but played better and seems to be less injury - prone than John Stones who was bought for 47 million.

With less than ten games left to play and a combination of injuries and weak support plaguing the team, Arsenal striker Alexis Sanchez is on pace for his lowest goal total in league play in over five years.

Wilshere could be sold for a huge amount (we could get between 30m - 50m for him) and be replaced with a better midfielder who is far less injury prone and actually make a decent contribution to the team and its goals.

I swear AFC is fast becoming a joke... if we are not carrying players who plays less than 10 matches in a season due to all kinds of injuries then we are forever waiting for some other players to fulfill their potentials or we are holding on to players well past prime or we are playing players based on favoritism even when we have better options on the bench....

Swapping Ozil for his older, more injury prone and less talented version and two kids?

and thier injuries need to be manage better maybe less playing time for some than others, unfortunately wenger cant afford to give them the proper time of his coaching, as he is under massive pressure to succeed these days and hasn't got time to train them up properly, also he isn't tactically flexible enough to accommodate them into different attacking systems, to test what they can do like having the ox in a 3 man midfield could work wonders.

And with the injury situation at the club as good as it has been for many a year, the boss is perhaps under less pressure than usual when it comes to selecting his starting line up to face Aston Villa at Wembley.

No disrespect but to me, kondogdia would be the better DM for us to sign, he is more physical, tracks back a lot to win balls, has pace, and is less injury prone!

That is past now, we live in the present, he is getting older and more injury prone in the less physical Spanish league, coming to Arsenla and the PL will make matters worse for him.

We need maybe a bit of luck for this season, and I hope less injuries.

Look for someone younger and less injury prone.

If the player injury is the only reason for stopping the clock (other than his or a teammate's helmet coming off, Rule 3 -3-9) with less than one minute in the half, the opponent has the option of a 10 - second runoff.

For now the club haven't walked the talk... they are making all those backroom changes and it ia a good thing if it leads to better preparation, less injuries and better competition within the squad.

We've been getting less injuries and recovering quicker since Christmas, so I'd say that we've got positives there for sure.

This is more or less in exact contrast to the atmosphere around the American team, for it has followed a dreary, rutted trail, full of nagging injuries and black moods.

Things look a little less rosy for teammate Dani Ceballos though, as he was also left out of the squad with no apparent injury concern ruling him out of contention.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

This equates to less injuries, and in time, much stronger and more coordinated athletes because they will have been preparing for years.

so i understand that wenger did nt want a player on that niveau for that we have campbell with potential or of course one can argue that we could have sold players like wilshere or ox or walcott or ramsey who attract injuries (i do nt like to say injury prone ^ ^) and bought less injury prone -LRB-:P) players but i would have absolutely hated it to see even one them leaving..

Defender - bellerin is good enough as backup for RB, and hopefully hayden can immediately slot into arsenal first team... and just to say, gibbs must less his moving forward to avoid injury....

Despite key injuries to Ozil, Giroud and Walcott, we scored 2 less goals than Chelsea, and 9 more goals than United, who finished 4th in both standings and goals for.

Russell Westbrook being out for the playoffs is still a devastating blow for the Thunder, but it was less devastating than expected in the first round because Westbrook's replacements played really well after his injury.

Less pleasing for the Emirates side was the injury sustained by captain Cesc Fabregas soon after he had scored.

I will just point out some of the things a new manager would bring, like... 1) Signings before the last day of the window 2) Better fitness preparation for less injuries 3) New tactics and ideas on how to break teams down and how not to get hammered by top clubs 4) Players that will fill the gaps we've had with the keeper, the defense, and the lack of a good striker 5) Rotations, so we don't wear our team down.

Although the bid is less than City initially paid for Jovetic themselves, the player's injury record during his time with the club suggests it may be wise to cash in on him if an offer comes in.

Played less than 30 % of games for Pool this season — looks like a long - term and persistent injury risk and we have enough of those.

Our medical staff appears to be less than adequate and injuries is something we have moaned about for a long time.

The price to pay for that is we started slow but hopefully will have less injury concern and able to maintain good form until end of season.