Question One: If you had to choose between more job security with a small pay increase and
less job security with a big pay increase, which would you pick?
A) Definitely more job security with a small pay increase B) Probably more job security with a small pay increase C) Probably
less job security with a big pay increase D) Definitely
less job security with a big pay increase
If you had to choose between more job security with a small pay increase and
less job security with a big pay increase, which would you pick?
Not exact matches
Long delayed by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Title III was the most controversial provision of the
JOBS Act because it allowed non-accredited investors — generally defined as individuals
with less than $ 1 million in assets who earn
less than $ 200,000 per year — to invest in private companies as shareholders.
For millions, the prospect of a secure retirement is slipping further and further away — especially among workers
with less education, whose
job security is increasingly tenuous.
Why trade a
job - for - life up in Albany for one
with significant
less job security (Council members can only serve two 4 - year terms)?
Far safer
jobs exist,
with better pay, more
job security, more regular hours, and more opportunities... not to mention
less exposure to radiation, nasty chemicals, biological pathogens, high voltages, and sharp, pointy things.
I have a yearly contract, so I have
less job security than tenure offers — though this doesn't worry me because in reality I can stay as long as I,
with the help of my team, continue to secure funding for my research.
You might think that postdocs,
with their low salaries, poor
job security, and often poor working conditions, would be
less happy than most other scientists.
And most universities fail to make these distinctions clear in «public - facing profiles,» the authors observe, which «exacerbate [s]» postdocs» optimistic tendency to assume that the term «professor» always means a traditional tenure - track position, when it often denotes a
job with much
less security.
However, returning teachers also reported lower satisfaction
with their
jobs,
less job security,
less autonomy over their work, longer work hours, and
less satisfaction
with the evaluation process.
Moreover, as
with defending
job security as a cheaper way to attract decent teachers, defined - benefit pension plans have big downsides
with hidden costs: They make it unappealing for a talented person to work as a teacher for just part of a career, make it hard for teachers to move around, offer huge bonuses to older teachers who don't add any special value, etc. (And this is all viewing education in isolation — committing future taxpayers to pay for pensions teachers are earning now is going to mean spending
less on other priorities in the future.
These are the workers
with less job security and who usually earn
less money.
If it's more than 20 %, then you'd probably do a better
job of managing your money yourself using our CHIM, you'd probably get a higher yield
with a higher overall rate of return
with less risk, you'd end up selling many
less shares, worrying about trust, ethics,
security, and privacy issues would be history, and you'd save all of their fees and commissions - forever!
Without notice, explanation or discussion, the employer changed Perera's
job to «society float» (which involved fewer hours and
less security),
with her wage and benefits remaining the same.
Each of these five professions offers extraordinary
job security, along
with educational and training requirements far
less strenuous than the ones imposed upon doctors.
Female employees were
less satisfied than male employees
with their lower level
jobs having
with a lower payment and as well as due to
less social
security.