Without high - tech startups driving innovation and economic efficiency, the United States should experience
less labor productivity.
Not exact matches
The Bureau of
Labor Statistics shows that
productivity has only risen 1 % YOY from 2015 to 2016, much
less than the typical increase experienced earlier in the decade.
The rest is attributable to businesses having a lot
less physical capital (such as machines and software) than was anticipated, and having unexpectedly low total factor
productivity (the
productivity of
labor and capital).
Meanwhile, business owners still profit more from lower
labor costs than they lose from either lower sales or
less robust
productivity gains.
[158] Other causes include the rise in non-cash benefits as a share of worker compensation (which aren't counted in CPS income data), immigrants entering the
labor force, statistical distortions including the use of different inflation adjusters by the BLS and CPS,
productivity gains being skewed toward
less labor - intensive sectors, income shifting from
labor to capital, a skill gap - driven wage disparity,
productivity being falsely inflated by hidden technology - driven depreciation increases and import price measurement problems, and / or a natural period of adjustment following an income surge during aberrational postwar circumstances.
Labor productivity in the U.S. rose by
less than expected in the first quarter, according to a report released by the
Labor Department on Thursday.
The chief argument against decentralizing production and attending to the well being of workers is that it would lead to
less productivity of
labor,
less efficiency, higher costs, and inferior goods.
Moreover, culinary training and the proper equipment make
labor more efficient and effective resulting in greater
productivity and
less food waste.
Also, given how many commodities are priced globally, and those have become a more important part of the cost structure recently (though the effect is not that bad if one takes a long - term view... increased
productivity means we use
less commodities to achieve the same ends as 40 years ago), the factor share going to
labor in developed countries is probably being squeezed a little.
A healthy economy increases
productivity and produces more goods and services with
less, not more,
labor.
The subpar growth reflects weak
productivity growth, which has averaged
less than 1 % over the past five years, and a low rate of
labor force participation that remains at levels last seen in the 1970s.
In a report issued from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) in January, average GDP growth was projected to be
less than 2 % per year between 2017 and 2020 due to sluggish growth in the
labor force of 0.5 % and
productivity growth of
less than 1.5 % per year.
In a report issued by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) in January, average GDP growth was projected to be
less than 2.0 percent per year between 2017 and 2020 due to sluggish growth in the
labor force of 0.5 percent and
productivity growth of
less than 1.5 percent per year.