During these troubled / troubling times, there are fewer jobs for graduates of any educational institution, much
less law school.
Not exact matches
«The official position of so many jurisdictions now is that they want
less solitary,» said Judith Resnik, the Arthur Liman Professor of
Law at Yale
Law School and a co-author of the report.
She was in
law school and
less than happy.
But at the end of the year, you write your own ticket if you're talented because now you have experience and it cost you
less than your
law school loans!
What is
less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the
laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and
schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
Government needs a more practical,
less academic social policy aimed at the deficiencies of public authority»
law enforcement,
school standards, and work requirements» that the research itself suggests are central to poverty today.
One does not have to abhor homosexuality in order to understand that the recent change in
law has opened a wide door that will leave the
school system, and children in general, vulnerable to further legal changes that will always go towards greater licentiousness, and
less protection for the vulnerable.
Poor children are
less healthy,
less involved in
school, more likely to drop out of
school, more likely to get in trouble with the
law, and much more likely to die prematurely.
Curtis Berger shocked his Columbia University
Law School associates at a convocation for the opening of the school year by saying, «I do not assert that legal education makes our graduates evil, but I do believe that [it makes them] less feeling, less caring, less sensitive to the needs of others,... even less alarmed about the injustices of our society than they were when they entered law school.&raq
Law School associates at a convocation for the opening of the school year by saying, «I do not assert that legal education makes our graduates evil, but I do believe that [it makes them] less feeling, less caring, less sensitive to the needs of others,... even less alarmed about the injustices of our society than they were when they entered law school.&
School associates at a convocation for the opening of the
school year by saying, «I do not assert that legal education makes our graduates evil, but I do believe that [it makes them] less feeling, less caring, less sensitive to the needs of others,... even less alarmed about the injustices of our society than they were when they entered law school.&
school year by saying, «I do not assert that legal education makes our graduates evil, but I do believe that [it makes them]
less feeling,
less caring,
less sensitive to the needs of others,... even
less alarmed about the injustices of our society than they were when they entered
law school.&raq
law school.&
school.»
School board officials said The Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act of 2010 requires them to change pricing because the
law states that
schools must charge on average no
less for paid student meals than the district receives in federal free meal reimbursement.
Almost every Democrat in the Senate gets big, major support from the Teachers Union so expect the Democrats to add a ton of exemptions and get rid of the
lesser of inflation or 2 % cap language then watch your
school and other local property taxes begin to spiral out of control again which is why the tax cap
law originally passed.
Albany
Law School Prof. Vin Bonventre has also been critical of Bharara, writing on his blog: «The United States Attorney owes it to his office, and to the justice system he is entrusted to serve, to conduct himself
less like a crusading politician and more like an ethically restrained prosecutor.»
«Farage has called for a bar on the children of legal immigrants from public
schools and health services, has said women are — and I quote — worth
less than men, and supports scrapping
laws that prevent employers from discriminating based on race.
The cap
law, one of Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo's major initiatives, limits
school districts and other local governments to basic annual tax increases of 2 percent or the inflation rate, whichever is
less.
Okorocha called on African parliaments to make
laws that would enable the children of the poor and the
less privileged to go to
school.
At the same time, the
school groups support ending the provision that essentially caps levy increases at
less than 2 percent: Currently, the cap
law limits increases to either the rate of inflation or 2 percent, whichever is lower.
The draft bill would also amend the state's education
law, requiring that any
school in which more than 25 percent of students live on campus must set aside a minimum of 50 beds — or 10 percent of total beds, whichever is
less — for substance abuse free living.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, but subject to such requirements as the legislature shall impose by general or special
law, indebtedness contracted by any county, city, town, village or
school district and each portion thereof from time to time contracted for any object or purpose for which indebtedness may be contracted may also be financed by sinking fund bonds with a maximum maturity of fifty years, which shall be redeemed through annual contributions to sinking funds established by such county, city, town, village or
school district, provided, however, that each such annual contribution shall be at least equal to the amount required, if any, to enable the sinking fund to redeem, on the date of the contribution, the same amount of such indebtedness as would have been paid and then be payable if such indebtedness had been financed entirely by the issuance of serial bonds, except, if an issue of sinking fund bonds is combined for sale with an issue of serial bonds, for the same object or purpose, then the amount of each annual sinking fund contribution shall be at least equal to the amount required, if any, to enable the sinking fund to redeem, on the date of each such annual contribution, (i) the amount which would be required to be paid annually if such indebtedness had been issued entirely as serial bonds,
less (ii) the amount of indebtedness, if any, to be paid during such year on the portion of such indebtedness actually issued as serial bonds.
Now, Assembly Democrats are considering amending the
less than two month old
law to allow the
schools more time.
Less than a month before Congress votes on whether to reauthorize a controversial program mandating healthier
school lunches, a new study confirms the suspicions of
school officials — many students are putting the fruits and vegetables they're now required to take straight into the trash, consuming fewer than they did before the
law took effect.
That's a big advantage, but there are some downsides to the Ph.D. track:
Law school and business school take a lot less time, and graduates of top medical schools, law schools, and business schools can expect to make big money when they fini
Law school and business
school take a lot
less time, and graduates of top medical
schools,
law schools, and business schools can expect to make big money when they fini
law schools, and business
schools can expect to make big money when they finish.
By the time I graduated from
law school in 1975, I had three preschool - age kids and a husband, at a time when female lawyers comprised
less than 3 percent of all lawyers and were generally unwelcome in
law firms and the halls of justice.
Personally, I chose to treat
law school a little
less casually.
The Gov
law conundrum is that others assistants (especially my MBA friends make twice as much as me — with 7 years
less school and loans.
The cliches just keep on coming, from crooked cops to a mobster's innocent daughter in
law school (at UCLA, no
less) to those great, great lines: «Come on, Sonny, let's go.
As a matter of fact, the rebellious Korean - American graffiti artist could care
less about getting good grades in
school or about obeying the
law.
These studies show, consistently, that parental
schools of choice not controlled by public
school districts 1) are usually prohibited by
law from screening out students based on admission exams, 2) use ability tracking
less frequently than traditional public
schools even when, legally, they can, and 3) may use ability tracking, but when they do, it is
less likely to have a negative effect on the achievement of low - track students.
Lovenheim and Willén found that students who spent all 12 years of elementary and secondary
school in a state with a duty - to - bargain
law earn an average of $ 795
less per year as adults than students who were not exposed to collective bargaining
laws during the same time period.
States with higher - than - expected SAT scores were
less likely to pass charter
school legislation; tended to adopt such legislation later, if at all; and passed weaker
laws.
Gov. Edward T. Schafer of North Dakota last week signed into
law a
school - finance measure that shifts some state funding from property - wealthy
school districts to those
less able to raise money through property taxes.
«A lot of people in special education have a mindset that it's all about compliance, but if you take a step back and understand the purposes of the
law, I think you'll see this is
less about complying and filling out IEPs left and right, and more thinking about, «Well, how do I problem solve to ensure my
school is better meeting the needs of kids with disabilities?»»
Instead of takeovers, closures, and other dire options mentioned in press coverage of the
law, most states and
school districts have chosen
less aggressive interventions.
A lot of people in special education have a mindset that it's all about compliance, but if you take a step back and understand the purposes of the
law, I think you'll see this
less as compliance and filling out IEPs left and right, and more thinking about, «Well, how do I problem solve to ensure my
school is better meeting the needs of kids with disabilities?»
They point, for example, to President Bush's No Child Left Behind
law (enacted in 2002), mayoral governance of
schools recently instituted in some cities, and the creation of a small number (4,638) of charter
schools that serve
less than 3 % of the U.S.
school - age population.
Most of the
schools are not even close to it, resulting in students across the city receiving far
less physical education than required by
law.
* Some state charter
laws have provisions that make starting a rural charter impossible or close to it * Rural charters get substantially
less funding than district - run
schools and face high costs related to transportation and buildings
Few jurisdictions have passed significant voucher and tax - credit legislation, and most have hedged charter
laws with one or another of a multiplicity of provisos — that charters are limited in number, can only be authorized by
school districts (their natural enemies), can not enroll more than a fixed number of students, get
less money per pupil than district - run
schools, and so on.
A classic example is charter advocates settling for state
laws that underfund charter
schools, even embracing the argument that «charter
schools can do it for
less» in order to get the
law passed, though experience shows that this accommodation can cripple actual entrepreneurs in practice.
Unlike other industries that often offer higher pay to compensate for
less desirable working conditions or to attract more desired applicants in high - need areas (like STEM fields), public
school systems are generally limited by collective bargaining agreements or state
law in their ability to offer differential compensation (see Goldhaber et al., 2015).
The bill, cleared by the legislature on Oct. 23, would provide Colorado's 176
school districts with approximately $ 101 million
less than they were expecting under the terms of the state's 1988
school - finance
law.
But such claims are difficult to square with the legislators» designation of
schools as not making «AdequateYearly Progress,» much
less with the fact that the
law gives families the option to attend another
school if their
school twice fails to make AYP.
It is no coincidence then that research has shown students who spend their full K — 12 education career in public
schools in states that require collective bargaining with teachers unions earn
less money, work fewer hours, are more likely to be unemployed, and are more likely to be employed in lower - skilled jobs than are their peers in states without collective bargaining
laws.
With the settlement, the Reed case ended up taking a different tack, switching from an effort to overturn the layoffs - by - seniority
law to a negotiated agreement to protect vulnerable students from the existing
law's potential impact — although for
less than 5 percent of the nearly 1,000
schools in the district.
Despite this overwhelming evidence, Newark Public
Schools are disproportionately affected by New Jersey's antiquated LIFO
laws because they employ a higher concentration of teachers with
less than effective ratings.
Charter
schools, vouchers, homeschooling and tax credit scholarships are all
less regulated than the neighborhood district
schools students are required to attend by
law.
When I retired from leading a portfolio of
schools with 10,522 students K - 12 in December, I felt my job dealt mostly with compliance with
law and
less about effectiveness in the classroom.
The Education
Law Center argues that it's an important factor because when wealthy families opt out of public education,
schools are left with higher concentrations of poor children, and there is
less political will to boost funds for public
schools.
The number of these new
schools is likely to be small, so this policy will have a much
less significant effect on the education system than the
law now being passed to enable maintained
schools to convert to academy status.
They are passing
laws to benefit the charter
school industry, to give them the financial advantage of hiring
less teachers.
Although I had dreamed of becoming an attorney and running my own corporation since a little girl, the prospect of
law school was
less colorful than I had imagined after graduating college.