Sentences with phrase «less like fact»

It sounds more like «chatter» and less like fact.

Not exact matches

Colbert, much like Wolf, mocked Bush's apparent distaste for facts, hammered the administration's actions in Iraq, and described Bush's then - 32 % approval rating as «backwash» — all while the president was sitting less than 10 feet away.

Despite the fact he isn't playing in this year's Masters, and isn't incredibly active on social media (less than 500 tweets, like ever), Woods» # 2 ranking proves that he is by far, the most popular golfer on the planet.

Smith likes to emphasize the fact that at a smaller company, there's more opportunity to make an impact and less bureaucracy to deal with.

The fact is, many working families are already living on far less than 70 % of their income when you take out non-discretionary expenses like mortgage payments and the feeding and care of children.

While we're programmed to retain information that seems relevant and which we can tie to other facts and sensations we're already storing in our heads, if a piece of data, like a name, is context-less and random there's less for the brain to latch on to.

In fact, when someone crumbles that last empty pack of their favorite brand and vows to never buy another, he might not realize that he is less like the heroic individual grasping his own bootstraps and more like a single bird whose sudden left turn is just one speck in the larger flock.

I'd also say not having the charge cable dangling over the seats might draw less attention to the fact that you have a $ 1,000 phone like the iPhone X in your car, especially if you leave the cable connected when you park (guilty).

But if you have the less - than - minor problem of not liking networking, this fact won't do you any good, so Page 19 goes on to recommend seven great reads for the networking phobic, including:

The facts are not right here, energy is cheap that means the cost of manufacturing and transporting of goods is low, food and consumers staples already more affordable, so what if a few American oil companies going out of business.the cost of producing oil in middle east is less than $ 10 / bl and we were paying more than $ 140 / bl for it, with that huge profit margin the big oil companies and oil producing nations became richer and the rest of us left behind, with the oil price this low the oil giants don't want to reduce the price at pump even a penny, because they are so greedy.worst case scenario is some CEOs bonuses might drop from $ 20 million to $ 15 millions I am sure they will survive.in terms of the stock market it always bounces back, after all it's just a casino like game.

Kimberly - Clark is also less profitable than P&G despite the fact that its business is heavily tilted toward richer, developed economies like the United States.

Companies with a certain cachet, like SpaceX, naturally attract their share of applicants these days — in fact, in 2015 SpaceX's internship program was flooded with 39,000 individuals, of which less than 2 % were offered positions.

Given this reality, faith begins to look less like a system or rational assent to a historical fact, a decision or even adherence to an ethical standard, and more like a recognition or awareness or belief or gratitude that our relationship with God is what gives us life.

Chad, don't bother... Your credibility is less than nil, since you like posting opinion and misleading info rather than fact.

From the article, talking about the UK — «In fact, the country is one of the less religious ones in Europe, home to vociferous critics of religion like Richard Dawkins, and those who find belief in a higher power simply unnecessary, like Stephen Hawking.»

Second, pragmatism, like all interest theories of ethics, has no way of escaping the subjectivism which grounds all value ultimately on subjective feeling, nor is this any less the case because of the objective methods that pragmatism supports for the judgment of whether our actions will in fact produce the values that we think they will.

A lesser known fact is that he was high as balls on LSD when he realized that the molecule would have to be shaped like a double helix.

On the contrary, the more people learn about the philosophical content of what scientists are calling the «fact of evolution,» the less they are going to like it.

Facts like, we can actually observe that there's less polar ice and glaciers are melting in Greenland, Iceland, etc..

A theory in its technical usage is something that is more or less verified or an established explanation accounting for known facts or observations, like the theory of relativity or how evolutionary biology is a theory.

The other fact remains that they are atheists with no knowledge of the Bible and less about life Kinda of listening to a drug addict about what its like to be a doctor.

So, I hold that the idea of freedom and the social fact of democracy were far less at work in places like Cuba, Columbian coast, Brazil, Puerto Rico, Jamaica, Trinidad, etc., than in our America.

In fact, today, «smarter» folks breed less than îdiot cretins like religious fundamentalists.

More or less of any of the ingredients won't make a huge difference, in fact you may like it more or less soupy (adjust how much water you leave in the pot), or saucy, or with extra beans.

But I liked the nutrition with less sugar and the fact that they embrace their roots with branding that's hardly changed since they launched and was curious if it would be something my clients might like.

I like the fact that coconut flour has less carbohydrates for the quantity you need, and costs much less.

Lucini's sauces taste like real tomatoes, which could have something to do with the fact that their tomatoes are grown on one of Italy's first organic farms and travel from field to jar in less than 24 hours.

The fact that in half a season Coquelin managed 12 less tackles, 4 less interceptions than Matic «the best CDm in the league» that ai nt a fluke (a fluke is a run of 2 or 3 games like puncheon tends to have), give him a whole season see what he is capable of then pass judgement on his ability...

Again, we a good quality player can come in for free (like we got Kolasinac), does the fact that such a player is free or came in for less than he would normaly cost mean that your team is not of good quality?

Less competition may seem like good news for the rest of the Premier League clubs chasing Reus, but the fact that City seem resigned to losing out to Real Madrid or Barcelona means Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea, and Manchester United are likely to miss out as well.

m so m determined in my heart that wenger wud never make me decamp arsenal, the fact is we barely or don't have a player like adams who wud have raised to crys of the fans to the board or high heavens, when I see less strong hearted or die hard players like ramos, keane, adams at arsenal, I feel so ashamed, we don't have any player with passion in our team bar sanchez... I look at players like ramsey giroud and I see cowards, rather have an ambitious player leave the team than a well seated and comfortable player like these remain..

That's fine other than the fact that some players and some positions push themselves allot more often than others do, like with a CB for a top nation, it's going to be allot less work than a midfielder playing in an average nation.

But it has been one disappointment after another so far and the fact that it looks like being a club with much less money than us that is crowned champions this year makes it all the more frustrating.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Also jimmy jazz again great name by the way i think the fact were 6th in ayer purchases and i agree without kane spurs would be below without kaneuckeu them for now but i see laca will be better next year and auba will have had a taste of the rigorous epl and because its a world cup year we need stability with wenger for atleast another year i think were vying for that spot and wi th cazorla coming back and hopfully Jack signs with a couple good signings if we splash some cash and ozil already signed we could surprise the league next year with a very strong season and Leicester surprised apparently everybody but us cause we handled them well that year but no one else dod and we finished second but i think its not so good for a big club like us with internationals in a world cup year to change managers do it in a non world cup year cause you only have a couple weeks with your players maybe less with some before season starts

For example 4 -3-3 concentrate less on playing in the centre and attempting to dominate it as it's contest Arsenal will win and take advantage of the fact that the full backs haven't got pace, which normally means the defensive midfielders or center backs often end up doubling up on the wingers... thus clearing a space in the middle and allowing people like Ozil and Giroud to play to the strong points of their game.

In actual fact Benzema receives less service from the likes of Ronaldo and Bale, especially Ronaldo as both those players have an eye for goal and are not scared to shoot.

I hope I'm wrong but this could be the most damaging win when it comes to transfers... winning 1 game, after about 20 minutes of really good play, is of little consequence in the grand scheme of things... only those with the most selfish of intentions would suggest otherwise... the only reason we're even in this predicament, where were celebrating our first victory of 2018 against a bottom half squad who is managed by possibly the only individual more antiquated than our manager, is because of Wenger's ridiculous mishandling of his contract last year combined with his mishandling of the contracts of our top players this year; a fact that he himself admitted to... so before you get too excited about the possibilities of our current roster don't forget what has happened over the last several years and pray to the gods of football that real quality reinforcements like Auba are on the way, which could have happened years ago for less money and we might have been holding a trophy of some significance, or this brief respite will be followed by the usual mediocrity and stagnation

The fact that Benteke and Lukaku have a better scoring record than Giroud in the past 3 seasons while at clubs like Aston Villa, West Brom and Everton with relatively lesser creative midfield and supply quality proves how good they are and will be at Arsenal.

Fact is, we would score less with a person like Martinez or higuain upfront we have a practical example from our last season with some Dutch guy.

But even though Wenger has spent less than two thirds what Mourinho has since his return to Stamford Bridge, the fact is that by signing players like Mesut Ozil and Alexis Sanchez, Wenger has proved that Arsenal can afford and attract top level players.

as a matter of fact it would be aimless and silly to one moment be putting ourselves out publicly to court talents like mbappe, lemar, asensio, only to backslide in favour of yesterdays man — for us to present our ambition this way is hardly progress and its less than fans deserve.

In fact, they lost to Tottenham less than a month ago in EPL action, a 5 - 2 thrashing at White Hart Lane where Southampton looked very much like a relegation - threatened side.

hey mate, whenever I watch hw one man or a group of stupid individuals sit back and care less about the emotions of loyal fans it goes to show how heartless humans can be... imagine the fact that the fans pay higher than both Madrid and barca fans who are entertained by the likes of messi, Ronaldo, bale, neymar, suarez and ramos... while we pay to watch skillless players like giroud, ramsey,... imagine the fact that the likes of sanogo is still on the paylist... how does that show ambition, I'd say arsenal has been before wenger and the board themselves..

«So it looks like Chelsea has taken advantage of the fact that all the other teams were less consistent.

In fact looking at players like Arshavin and Sanchez and to a lesser extend Ramsey, he tends to ruin good players by playing them out of their natural positions.

i like podolski and do nt think wenger has ever really got the best out of him but even at his best he is no longer a top flight player... we need to sell him and bring in someone who can really add to the level of our attack... and carvalho is now a benchmark for gauging wenger «s ambition... the lack of proper defensive cover is one reason our attacks have become much less threatening as players do nt want to overstretch knowing what «s not behind them... i am pretty confident we will beat besiktas (a team that would be hanging around the bottom of the epl if not lower) but the fact that we are in this position again speaks volumes for the way the club is run and managed

Just like we all thought when the initial news of Marchisio being injured came out, Juve's No. 8 will be playing... less than two weeks after the fact?!

I am sure you did not mean to assume that women who are in shelters need formula more than you do, in fact, poor and minority women «need» it less; they are at greater risk for negative health consequences associated with formula like diabetes, obesity, heart disease, etc..

Other facts, like that 15 - 30 percent of the fat gained during pregnancy goes straight to our thighs, were less reassuring.