* In most states, charter school districts reported spending
less money per pupil than traditional public schools on instruction, student support services and teacher salaries.
uk website has already shown that 99 % of schools in England will receive
less money per pupil in real terms even after the implementation of the proposed NFF.
Here is something big - city school, superintendents, school boards, and teachers» unions know but don't tell: districts spend
less money per pupil in the schools» serving the poorest children.
Charters nationally are producing student achievement gains that are very similar to the levels in traditional public schools but receive about 30 percent
less money per pupil.
Few jurisdictions have passed significant voucher and tax - credit legislation, and most have hedged charter laws with one or another of a multiplicity of provisos — that charters are limited in number, can only be authorized by school districts (their natural enemies), can not enroll more than a fixed number of students, get
less money per pupil than district - run schools, and so on.
Not exact matches
A study of 49 states by The Education Trust found that school districts with high numbers of low - income and minority students receive substantially
less state and local
money per pupil than school districts with few poor and minority children.
However, Kevin Courtney, chair of the National Union of Teachers (NUT), said that all schools in England will have
less money in real terms
per pupil in 2020 than they do now.
The truth is that the school gets superior results with the same or slightly bigger class sizes and
less state
money per pupil.
WHEREAS, the OSPP is financed with
per pupil payments that would typically go to support MPS, leaving
less money available for already under - funded public schools; and
The plan would cut Walker's proposed
per -
pupil funding increase and target more
money to school districts that spend
less than most others, according to a Legislative Fiscal Bureau memo prepared for Nygren and obtained by the Wisconsin State Journal.
For the past few years, Connecticut's ten neediest districts received increases of
less than $ 300
per pupil per year on average, with strict strings attached mandating that they spend that
money only the way Commissioner Pryor wanted it spent.