Sentences with phrase «less money upfront»

In fact, you may even be able to buy a home with less money upfront than you'd need to move into a rental property.
The idea is that you insure you'll have income flowing in late in retirement while parting with less money upfront than you would with an immediate annuity, leaving more of your savings for spending early in retirement.
One key finding is that retirees can take advantage of immediate annuities» guaranteed lifetime income while investing less money upfront if they're willing to adjust their spending and withdrawals from the rest of their savings throughout retirement based on how the financial markets are performing.
In fact, you may even be able to buy a home with less money upfront than you'd need to move into a rental property.
The idea is that you put up less money upfront than you would with an immediate annuity — leaving more of your savings for current spending — and by waiting to collect you receive a hefty payment in the future.

Not exact matches

These could include securing funding (Angel Round), hiring your own first developer from the initial revenues or it also becomes easier to convince someone to join your team with a greater equity and lesser upfront money.
And the risk of losing money also falls less on Mylan than it does on those at the end of the supply chain, with the pharmacy having to dispense EpiPens while accepting less in copay money upfront, then applying for a rebate and waiting to see what trickles back.
We can juggle ages for start of RRSP payouts, but it is clear that they have choices: 1) start CPP early to get more money upfront before age 65 in exchange for less money later; 2) start depleting RRSPs as soon as possible to avoid higher taxes later.
When it comes to cost, the upfront amount of money needed is far less for disposable diapers.
(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds of listings on the Vault, and as a result of doing so, won't see one thin dime of income on the site until October or later - Given all the time and money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't even expect to earn back my upfront investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf of authors who are listed in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any of those contacts result in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow authors.
Self - publishing and digital distribution enables authors to make their work widely discoverable and accessible with much less upfront investment and much higher potential to make money without a publisher taking the lion's share of royalties.
However, the lower upfront fees do result in less money being made available to the borrower than is available under HECM Standard.
There may be some leeway as to how much money you must find among lenders but most lenders will want to see a significant upfront payment, especially when your credit is less - than - perfect.
I feel even if upfront cost is more but in the longer turn if the lesser interest rate saves you money then why not go for refinancing?
Hi, imho, this is yet another example why Rogers credit cards» ONE benefit of huuuge reward chasing program, which eventually rebate back those upfront charges of annual and / or FX fees and (that money you loaned to them) be available whenever you reach their threshold spending and / or every year end ASK for credit next year, would be disadvantageous and less useful than those card issuers that charge no or zero foreign transaction fees aka FX - fee - free credit cards like Premier WE MC from HSBC or HT Preferred, HT Equityline (or even the MOGO prepaid) VISA products from Home Trust.
I tell them upfront: The premium is flexible in these types of policies; you can put in more money if you want or less money if you want.
This will require more upfront money on your part if a loss occurs, but you pay less on the premium.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z