Not exact matches
I feel and I am convinced
of one thing: that nothing is more dangerous for the future
of the world, nothing moreover
less warranted in Nature, than the affected resignation and false realism with which in these days a great number
of people, hunching their shoulders and drawing in their heads, predict (and in so doing tend to provoke) a further
catastrophe in the near future.
In prophetic utterance
of that time and in later cultic liturgy, the
catastrophe was deemed to be (no
less than exodus or Zion) the disclosure and effects
of God's will and power.
My priest friend attacked him publicly for preaching such religious «opium» and stated that the
catastrophe was not an accident at all, much
less the will
of God, but rather the result
of an exploitative system that puts profits ahead
of human lives and well - being.
The theme
of impending
catastrophe is sounded no
less forthrightly than in Amos.
The fairly shambolic nature
of the response from the west, and the international community as a whole (and the fact that though shamefully belated it managed to avert the imminent
catastrophe in Benghazi) shows that we have learnt little or nothing from Bosnia, Kossovo, Kurdistan, where intervention helped, still
less from the many other areas where nothing effective was done, and we essentially abandoned people to their fate.
Here the authors are not mentioning that values at the lower end
of the spectrum represent a
less dramatic situation than a value at the higher end
of the spectrum, which probably would have really supported a climate
catastrophe.
All students are limited by standardized one - size - fits - all instruction, but it is a special
catastrophe for vulnerable children who are
less able to keep up with the pace
of instruction.
I isolated my characters long before global
catastrophe struck, so that once it did, their struggles would be
less about how the logistics
of life have changed and more about the interior toll
of such a shift.
With
less debt, you save money on interest charges and reduce your risk
of financial
catastrophe if your income is disrupted and you are unable to make payments.
That's right around the national average, and far
less than the cost
of dealing with a
catastrophe without coverage!
Property -
catastrophe made a lot
of money because there were no significant
catastrophes in 2014, but rates are presently inadequate there, and BRK is likely to write
less of it in 2015.
As time went by, we felt disappointed when we saw so - called Christians who choose to care more about abortions than the welfare
of less fortunate but alive children, or about keeping a brain - dead woman alive while ignoring the massive health - care crisis in this country that leaves millions
of poor people without any medical care, even for preventable health
catastrophes.
But if you want to go with
less coverage and get insurance for, say, $ 10 a month to cover a
catastrophe or perhaps only some basic wellness treatments, those options are available through each
of my top picks, too.
Why should climate change necessarily create
catastrophe —
of which there is much
less agreement — let alone a political response to mitigate that
catastrophe?
Acceptance
of clearly erroneous papers, such as those from Mann et al., pasted - together climate reconstructions, a tendency to jump on every temperature blip as proof
of imminent
catastrophe, etc. all serve to show that the community is
less interested in communicating the truth than it is in maintaining a narrative
of impending doom.
And 2 ˚C is far, far too high, given the now clear evidence that at
less than 1 ˚C
of warming we are already on the precipice
of climate
catastrophe, from the Arctic to the Great Barrier Reef, from the Himalayas to Siberia.
may be in considerably
less denial than a lot
of professional environmentalists, the ones who paint a picture
of global warming Armageddon, then assure us that we can avert
catastrophe by buying «green» products and creating clever markets in pollution.
I can not see how adding nuance to the degree
of future
catastrophe the claim asserts will make it any more or
less convincing.
... when it comes to the real - world consequences
of those scientific findings, specifically the kind
of deep changes required not just to our energy consumption but to the underlying logic
of our economic system, the crowd gathered at the Marriott Hotel may be in considerably
less denial than a lot
of professional environmentalists, the ones who paint a picture
of global warming Armageddon, then assure us that we can avert
catastrophe by buying «green» products and creating clever markets in pollution.
With all the doom and gloom
of global warming alarmism, this unexpected truth
of modern global warming being
less than the pre-modern era is an indicator that man - made
catastrophe is not just around the corner.
And worst
of all, everybody involved in UK politics seemed to be using the looming
catastrophe to demand that people use
less, expect
less, and obey the tenets
of environmentalism.
The latest in the series puts the gap between emissions trends and what is actually required to keep the rise in global temperature at a level which does not spell
catastrophe for the planet at between 8 - 12 billion tons
of carbon dioxide - equivalent (CO2e) by 2020 —
less a gap than a gaping chasm!
IMO it's not particularly sensible to frame the entire issue in terms
of the small chance
of «climate
catastrophe» because then we risk having the rug abruptly pulled out from under our policies when someone proves that the
catastrophe is
less likely than was previously thought: — RRB - Also, arguing over the precise threshold probability for particular outcomes risks turning into angels - on - pins stuff.
One can think
of a GHG abatement policy as a form
of insurance: society would be paying for a guarantee that a low - probability
catastrophe will not occur (or is
less likely).
And there is an obvious selection effect that on average, the selected published models will be close to the observations, but that the disagreements may more or
less cancel statistically: I wouldn't be surprised if ON AVERAGE, astrological predictions would be shown to give a reasonable rate
of various
catastrophes, earthquakes,
If you're enticed by the opportunity to be responsible for new species, one suggests genetic engineering is more timely, and
less costly than inducing
catastrophe to create new niches or eliminate old denizens
of current ones.
While the tornado risk in Beaufort is small, as it is 43 percent
less than the national average, it is important to bear in mind that major
catastrophes such as tornadoes, hurricanes and house - fires can lead to a total loss
of your home and all the property you keep inside.
That's right around the national average, and far
less than the cost
of dealing with a
catastrophe without coverage!