«It's difficult to determine whether this is a symptom
of unconscious
gender bias in the hiring process or results from an ongoing cycle
of women being underpaid, setting their salary expectations too low, and ultimately receiving
less in subsequent roles,» the report reads.
A new study out today in Psychology
of Women Quarterly examined a well - known space for candid sharing
of thoughts — the comments sections
of online articles — and found that men are much
less likely to agree with scientific evidence
of gender bias in STEM than women.
Approximately equal numbers
of women and men enter and graduate from medical school in the United States and United Kingdom.1 2 In northern and eastern European countries such as Russia, Finland, Hungary, and Serbia, women account for more than 50 %
of the active physicians3; in the United Kingdom and United States, they represent 47 % and 33 % respectively.4 5 Even in Japan, the nation in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development with the lowest percentage
of female physicians, representation doubled between 1986 and 2012.3 6 However, progress in academic medicine continues to lag, with women accounting for
less than 30 %
of clinical faculty overall and for
less than 20 %
of those at the highest grade or in leadership positions.7 - 9 Understanding the extent to which this underrepresentation affects high impact research is critical because
of the implicit
bias it introduces to the research agenda, influencing future clinical practice.10 11 Given the importance
of publication for tenure and promotion, 12 women's publication in high impact journals also provides insights into the degree to which the
gender gap can be expected to close.