Not exact matches
Of much
less importance is your observation that Pielke does not engage in
ad hominem or hold grudges.
The activism
of the raters - pure
ad hominem argument, the only hard evidence presented
of incorrect categorisation (and I agree with some) amount to a lot
less than 1 %
of the total.
Sorry, hunter, but the other (
less well known) half
of the «
ad hominem» fallacy is to pretend that a critique just can't apply because
of * who * someone is.