Sentences with phrase «less per point»

For example, if you booked the same DFW to CZM flight with 25,000 American Airline miles and paid the fees, you'd be spending 10,000 more miles and redeeming at 2.5 cents per point, almost 2 cents less per point than with Avios.

They tend to give you a value of 1 cent or less per point.

HHonors points are worth significantly less per point than other loyalty points so a straight forward comparison is usually quite difficult.

Not exact matches

A recent survey published by insolvency trustee MNP Ltd. found 48 per cent of Canadian respondents were $ 200 or less away from being unable to fulfill their monthly financial obligations, an eight point increase since September.

Meanwhile, «transportation in the U.S. costs the equivalent of less than one yuan ($) per kilometer, while road tolls [in China] are higher,» he added, pointing out that some mid - and small - sized Chinese enterprises have already started moving to Southeast Asian countries like Vietnam and Cambodia for cheaper wages and materials.

Ordinary metrics such as calls per day and minutes per call are a decent starting point, but they alone are not comprehensive enough to paint a complete picture of the skills of any particular sales rep.. So, consider incorporating lesser - used metrics into your performance tracking, such as voicemail - return rate, dial - to - opportunity percentage and dials - to - appointments ratio.

Case in point: a family that used to spend hundreds per month going out to the movies can now binge - watch all four seasons of House of Cards on Netflix in 30 days for less than the cost of a large popcorn.

Investors are the winners: The average ETF in 2018 will charge less than 40 basis points ($ 4.00 per $ 1,000 invested), less than half the average mutual fund.

Inflation is estimated to rise by somewhat less than 1/4 percentage point per annum over 2 — 3 years.

I found that at the point I'd be ready and comfortable to retire, my expenses would be $ 1,960 per month, requiring a portfolio of $ 588k at a 4 % withdrawal rate — much less than Joe's $ 750k.

The reason this was done was because star wood gives out less points but requires less points, per category.

You will only earn 1 point less per dollar for your travel purchases compared to the Pathfinder Rewards.

I wanted to make this point for readers that make less money because if I read the post above and made $ 60K per year, I'd find it kind of discouraging.

This will cause the value of your points to fluctuate, depending on the redemption you're getting — we urge readers to make sure they are not walking away with a value of less than $ 0.02 per mile, otherwise they'll be devaluing their points significantly.

New Democrats have repeatedly pointed out that it is ludicrous to force the public sector, which is responsible for less than one per cent of greenhouse gases emitted in the province, to subsidize big polluters who pay no penalty for the majority of their greenhouse gas emissions.

The weighted average of the MERs charged by the component ETFs works out to about 21 basis points per year, which means the Sleepy Portfolio costs about $ 275 every year or about 75 cents a day — less than half the cost of a large double - double these days.

If undertaken over five years, the 1.5 percentage point hike for employers would be just 0.3 per cent per year, which is less than ordinary year - to - year variations in wages.

At the time of its December meeting, the available information confirmed the assessment that a less expansionary policy setting was needed, and the cash rate was therefore raised by a further 25 basis points, to 5.25 per cent.

No less a value conscious investor than Warren Buffett commented on this shift at the most recent Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, where he pointed to the fact that the largest companies in the S&P 500; Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, and Google generate far more cash per dollar of earnings than companies of the past.

The discouraging problem is that an increasing population could level off its consumption only if each person consumed less, whereas all our habits and traditions point to rapidly increasing per capita consumption.

If we divide the points between 5 meals, we get 20 points (or less) per meal, which will keep your blood sugar stable and you'll be able to avoid the adverse symptoms described above.

If you bake the cheesy potluck potatoes in a cupcake pan would you still bake 1 hour and also would each serving still be 5 points per muffin or less?

«It is very pleasing to see however the latest Fonterra milk price at $ 6 which is 14 per cent up this period and at $ 6 basically the dairy farms are above their break - even point so we do expect to see less stress in dairy going forward.»

Just to point out that this made 2 smoothies, making it under 150 calories per serving and even less if you do not add the optional coconut flakes.

JPMorgan expects food and grocery margins to fall 91 basis points to just 3.23 per cent — less than half those at Woolworths — because of operating deleverage, higher operating costs and gross margin compression from reducing inventories.

They showed a stat last night of the difference with Joel and without during the win streak — it's minimal — offense 3 more points per game defense just a shade less effective - so to think the Sixers won't maintain the pace is not accurate.

In October and November, he averaged less than 18 points per game with his new squad, but since the beginning of December, he's averaged nearly 27 points per game.

This team really buckled down in this contest, emerging victorious, despite scoring less than their average points per game of 67.3.

Buried in a Puerto Rican roster full of veterans, they played sparingly in Atlanta, averaging less than 16 minutes per game apiece and four and eight points per game, respectively.

We'd get back to 30 points per game, while giving up less than 20.

Oregon earns 44 first - place votes in the Week 12 BlogPoll, more than half of the total cast, but Kansas State earns 24 first - place votes of its own and is less than half a point per ballot behind the Ducks.

Stephen F. Austin's top three scorers - Kevon Harris, TJ Holyfield and Shannon Bogues - totaled 20 points less than their combined per - game averages.

Things like overall record (without looking into if there is mitigating circumstances), Total defense (trash stat that doesn't take into account quality of offenses played), Total offense (same as total defense), scoring average (much less telling than points per possession), etc..

Nobody obliterates a lesser team's defense like the Tigers, who have, over the last two seasons, averaged 66 points per game against UConn, Eastern Michigan, Idaho, Missouri State, and Delaware State.

I find it fascinating that he has a better FT % than bolden, better TS %, better EFG %, reasonably close other numbers in a per minute status, he has more points scored this year compared to Bolden in about 300 less minutes (about 2/3 the minutes).

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Using our statistical filters, we were able to isolate teams with a three - point shooting percentage of greater than 30 % with defenses that allow less than 95 points per game (ppg).

How many times has a team averaging 40 points per game faced a defense allowing less than 14 points per game?

But, he was scoring at the rate of 25 points per 36 minutes (about 2.5 less than last season), but his rebounds, assists, and steals were slightly better per 36 minutes than his numbers last season.

New Mexico State is 1 - 5 SU in its last five games as an underdog of five points or less per the OddsShark College Basketball Database.

Ole Miss closed with just 25 % of spread tickets, pushing coach Hugh Freeze's career ATS record to 8 - 0 when receiving less than 30 % of spread tickets, covering by an average of 9.88 points per game.

Team AEPi FR (Griffin Lowy) struggled to get it going in this game, scoring less than their average of 59.3 points per game for the year.

Team Delts SR really didn't have their best stuff in this game and it showed, scoring less than their average of 51.0 points per game for the season.

Team Sammy SR (Jack O Keefe) really were unable to get rolling on offense in this one, scoring less than their average of 67.2 points per game for the year.

Only three teams are more efficient defensively than the Mavericks, who allow opponents less than 96 points per 100 possessions.

At 93.3 points per game, the Blue Devils are scoring just a few points less than the Sacramento Kings.

The 5 - 10, 205 - pound junior tailback has been the lightning rod for a Clayton Valley team averaging more than 400 yards of offense per game, and has scored less than 49 points just twice in 10 games.

We also learned that teams allowing 23 points per game or less have gone 19 - 12, but once we eliminate all duplicates that record moves to 11 - 4.

-- Historically, teams receiving less than 40 % of bets have gone 8 - 2 ATS in the Elite 8, covering by an average of 5.75 points per game.

Last season Gobert averaged 8.4 points, 9.5 rebounds and 2.3 blocks per game despite starting less than half of Utah's games.