Sentences with phrase «less per pupil»

Charter schools receive less per pupil funding even though the funding follows each student.

According to a 2011 report from EdTec, BCS students receive $ 3,739 less per pupil funding than students who attend a traditional public school in LASD.

A recent analysis of 30 states and the District of Columbia found that funding disparities between charter and district schools grew more than 54 percent between 2003 and 2011.72 In FY 2011, charter schools on average received $ 3,500 less per pupil than district schools, a difference of 28 percent.

But in educational attainment, students in Texas are, on average, one to two years ahead of California students of the same age, even though Texas has a lower per capita income and spends less per pupil than California does (Exhibit 3).

Principal Carey Dahncke also says it costs $ 4000 less per pupil to educate students at his school than in Indianapolis Public Schools.

In Pennsylvania, for example, high - poverty school districts spend 33 percent less per pupil than wealthier districts in the state.114

In the 2016 - 17 school year, charter schools receive substantially less per pupil regardless of whether it operates in public or private space; the IBO estimates that charters are underfunded compared to traditional district schools by $ 1,145 to $ 4,863 per pupil.

Charters on average receive approximately $ 1,400 less per pupil than OUSD schools on a per pupil basis after adjusting partially for equity.

# 2 — Weingarten's next core knowledge «fact» is that «Thirty - one states are spending less per pupil on public education than they were in 2007.»

The report found that charter schools that do not have access to Department of Education classroom space receive $ 3,017 less per pupil than district schools.

The report also found that charter schools that share space with district schools in DOE buildings still receive $ 305 less per pupil.

NYC charter schools spend considerably less per pupil and have a 70 % graduation rate.

In my first post, I started with an NCES report from 2011 showing that charters spend $ 1800 less per pupil.

An older, thorough study by McKinsey & Company in 2007, noted that Singapore achieves top performance while spending less per pupil than 27 of 30 OECD countries.

The government said it would phase out the existing, arbitrary process, where some authorities in the poorest areas receive as much as # 2,000 less per pupil in total.

In 23 states, state and local governments are together spending less per pupil in the poorest school districts than they are in the most affluent school districts, putting the children in these low - income, high - need schools at an even further disadvantage.

In fact, like most charter schools, even those in public - private partnerships, receive on average 30 % less per pupil than their traditional school peers whose management has no accountability or incentive to improve student outcomes.

Indeed, Utah, which spends less per pupil than Oklahoma does, now ranks 32nd in Education Week's «Quality Counts» report, while Oklahoma remains in 47th place.

«California already spends less per pupil than almost every state in the country and deeper cuts to our schools will only put the futures of more children at risk.

It says the current school funding rules are arbitrary and unfair and see the worst - funded areas receive on average # 2,000 less per pupil than the best - funded each year.

The result of this «base allocation» approach is that the district spends less per pupil in schools that have a higher proportion of beginning teachers (i.e. those with lower salaries).

Two weeks ago Education Minister Sam Gymiah told MPs: «It is patently unfair that Knowsley received nearly # 750 less per pupil than Wandsworth.»

Although it is a «high aid» district, in the current school year the District will spend less per pupil than the state average for instructional costs.

After running the numbers, we found that the poorest districts in California actually receive $ 620 less per pupil than the wealthiest districts.

By removing real estate as an obstacle, charters were able to focus on curriculum, students and school culture — especially important because New York charter students receive several thousand dollars less per pupil than children in district schools.

Secondary schools across the north receive on average # 1,300 less per pupil than those in London, an extraordinary shortfall.

MPS students currently receive $ 1,000 + less per pupil in state funding when compared to their surrounding suburban colleagues.

On average, Connecticut spends $ 4,000 less per pupil on charter school students than it does on students at district schools.

Nationwide, nearly a third of the alternative - school population attends a school that spends at least $ 500 less per pupil than regular schools do in the same district.

Was it right that her children should have limited access to speech therapy and music programs simply because their school received $ 1,000 less per pupil each year than other public schools?

District 2 also spent less per pupil on average for core courses (math, science, English / literature, and social studies / history / economics) than for noncore courses, which include electives and foreign language.

Education Minister Sam Gymiah told MPs: «It is patently unfair that Knowsley received nearly # 750 less per pupil than Wandsworth.»

In Buffalo, charter schools receive $ 9,800 less per pupil than traditional public schools, while in Rochester the gap is $ 6,600.

Scholars Bryan Hassel and Deborah Page showed that during the 1999 - 2000 school year, charters in Ohio received about $ 2,300 less per pupil than local school districts.

Camden had the largest per - pupil funding gap in our study, with charter schools students receiving 45 %, or $ 14,771, less per pupil than TPS students.

Urban school districts spend significantly less per pupil on their high - poverty schools than their low - poverty ones, a fact that is routinely masked by school budgets that use average - salary figures rather than actual ones, a new paper suggests.

The report from IPPR found that secondary schools in the north receive on average # 1,300 less per pupil than schools in London.

Within the same district, charter schools typically receive less per pupil spending than the traditional public school.

Not exact matches

By the end of this Parliament, an underperforming failing school will be deemed one where less than fifty per cent of pupils are getting five good GCSEs.

The last government deemed a secondary school to be failing if five good GCSE passes were achieved by less than 30 per cent of their pupils.

Syracuse spends $ 18,232 per pupil — more than West Genesee but far less than Syosset.

«If Dayton schools were in great shape, I would say it's less complicated than it is,» he said, noting that the district spends more than $ 14,000 per pupil, while Immaculate spends under $ 5,000.

The study found that specialist primary teachers are six per cent less effective than their non-specialist colleagues, with data showing pupils who were taught by subject specialists saw a drop in their grades.

The number of top schools with less than six per cent of disadvantaged pupils is also down from 57 per cent in 2013 to 39 per cent in 2016.

Our per - pupil costs ($ 16,292 in 2014) are consistently less than New Jersey's state average ($ 18,891 in 2014).

It is therefore unsurprising that Frederick County Title I schools would lose less, about an estimated $ 900 per poor pupil, compared to the $ 1500 per poor pupil in Montgomery County Title I schools under portability.

The same analysis also found that pupils from poorer backgrounds who performed just as well as their more well off peers were still less likely to attend grammars, with 66 per cent of children who achieve level five in both English and Maths at Key Stage 2 who are not eligible for free school meals going to a grammar school compared with 40 per cent of similarly high achieving children who are eligible for free school meals.

In contrast, for nonpoor children, a 10 percent increase in per - pupil spending throughout the school - age years increases educational attainment by less than 0.1 years, and this estimate is not statistically significant.

For schools that have 16 or less eligible pupils, they will receive # 1,000 per pupils.

Students in public charter schools receive $ 5,721 or 29 % less in average per - pupil revenue than students in traditional public schools (TPS) in 14 major metropolitan areas across the U. S in Fiscal Year 2014.