Sentences with phrase «less player then»

Not exact matches

Universal had heard all the stories of Hopper's erratic behavior over the years, first as an up - and - coming actor who had small parts in the James Dean movies «Rebel Without a Cause» and «Giant» (he admired Dean immensely), then as a bit player on a slew of TV shows, where he got little respect and gave even less back.
No surprise, then, that NBA owners want to peg the percentage of revenues paid to players to 50 % or less.
The reason we are being linked with Gimenez in the first place is supposed to be that Wenger is not willing to match the # 30 million valuation that Spanish club Valencia have slapped on their German international centre back Shkodran Mustafi, so I do not understand why we would then pay more for a player with less experience.
But blame should b put on the manager who fields players out of position and there by weaken the team n» get far less from the team.Carzola / Ozill, Wilshere / Ramsey all play the same roles respectively and should b used interchangably then give the left winger slot to Joel Campbell
I get it now, if you put up a MOTM performance then you get dropped for a less impressive player.
we gave mediocre players stupid contracts, such good ones infact they would rather be a bench player and earn crazy coin, then play first team elsewhere for less money
It's like the Suarez deal... Offer less than the player is worth so that the offer gets rejected and then u can tell everyone that u tried but it didn't work out.
Wins like this go to the players heads who then put in less effort in the next match.
Then there is the loss of Sanchez and Ozil in the summer for free, if Wenger was planning to leave, the fallout from that would be less, and would create space in the team for a new manager to bring in a couple of big name players to help reshape the team.
Plus if you play Rosicky over let's say Wilshere, then Wilshere is less able to develop and progress as a player due to a lack of game time.
Ye crack me up these articles are just paper talk then all ye take it so seriously moan about Wenger most of ye are haters judge him after the window the man is a legend in my eyes and it will be a sad day when he leaves and he will leave when he wants he still can attract top players he is well respected he bought ALEXIS SANCHEZ less bitching more supporting
If not, then why are we bidding less for a player with no backup option?
Arsenal players haven been overly played this season because of the Europa league where we have been playing mainly our B team and Ozil and MK haven't had too many games before Christmas so i think our first 16 players are not heavily over worked and will have less to do in the coming weeks, we should be more worried about match fitness then fatigue,
Take out Aubameyang's goals, he contributes less than Welbeck to overall play, so if I have a Welbeck scoring regularly and contributing generally as well, why then should I relegate him to the status of a squad player?
I did say in an earlier post «It could be that vardy's aim is to get an improved offer from leicester, maybe less than Arsenal but then he can say to the leicester fans «i could have moved for more money but decided to stay», he can claim to be a loyal leicester player when in reality he has forced them to pay him more money.»
Then after offering less than 20m I think, we go and throw a 90m bid on an unproven player so he can replace a world class one that we paid 32m for.
anyone is replaceable (even though the old one couldn't replace Vieira for so long = stubbornness & arrogance), the market has quality players, just a matter of bidding the right amount (not 2m less then put him in the I - nearly - signed - him list)
I'm saying Booker's defenders have less merit to their position that he's a star (mostly because stars are ordinarily as big of losers as he is) then Bender defenders have to their position he could become a solid NBA rotation player on a winning team.
What is to stop Monaco bringing in twenty players, giving them tax free contracts and then offloading them on loan across Europe where teams will lap up the fact they will have to pay less in the way of wages.
«Then when you play in the Premier League alongside players who have won a lot of trophies or who have played a lot of games in the Premier League, they give you this kind of experience so you make less mistakes, you react differently to different situations.
If Man City do come in with a bid and we can manage to milk them for all we can get then maybe we should go for it and use the tidy sum to buy a less injury prone player.
This is one of the easiest transfer windows ever for Arsenal yet we seem to be complicating thing.Monaco aren't selling Lemar for less than # 80, Roma want Mahrez desperately and we've been offered Rafinha by Barcelona.Why don't we sign Mahrez or Rafinha.Both players will improve our squad greatly and with consistency are world class players.Rafinha is also very versatile.After signing one of them we just need a CM then we are done.
I swear AFC is fast becoming a joke... if we are not carrying players who plays less than 10 matches in a season due to all kinds of injuries then we are forever waiting for some other players to fulfill their potentials or we are holding on to players well past prime or we are playing players based on favoritism even when we have better options on the bench....
If you aren't in Europe at all then maybe you need less players but that's not something to think about now.»
@Fatboy Gooner The Ozil deal was far less that 40 plus million as has been exposed on football leaks it was more in the region of 32 million with verious clauses that enable REM to take a percentage of any profit we make on selling Ozil and I would assume there are similar attachments with the Sanchez deal, even our record signings are clouded in smoke and mirrors so let not run away with the idea that its all SWengers fault, if your employer is on your back and pushing for results then you perform at a higher rate and push harder where as Wenger has no push from above so does nt go out of his way Kroenke does nt have the culture around him to win trophies cos thats not his aim and that filters down to the grass roots at Arsenal and shows in Wengers transfer policy and in the players performance.
100 grand a week is allot for maybe third choice player, if he was on less money and happy playing bit part role well then youd have to say keeping him would be in our best interests.
2 things; wenger has to take massive crtisism for favoritism with certain players and for spending latley on less than whats needed e.g why play ozil, ramsey, walcott, when they havnt performed, anyone can see a front 3 of welbeck, sanchez and perez would cause havoc Xhaka wtf he cant takle, is not mobile enough and has the temper and the decision making skills of a of a suicide victim, why did nt we go in for Kante less money and 10x a better player or even Schneiderlin thinking about what happens after wenger ask yourself this will we win the league next year with wenger then ask if we got the right manager next year would we win the league
If the Arsenal transfer rumours are true then it is hardly surprising that the Arsenal and Chile international star Alexis Sanchez has seemed less than pleased of late, because even though Mesut Ozil is a great player, I do not think you would get many Arsenal fans arguing that it is the Chilean who is more important to our team than the Germany international.
But they'll weaken the team by selling their best players and then buy few good players (usually of lesser quality than the ones they sold) who kinda strengthen the weakened team....
wenger is not openly known to lie about a «dead certain transfer» of a player maybe on certain occasions to cover some targets he denies any involvement in some circumstances but generally if he says that we are not close to signing a defender then it ai nt happening until he gives the go ahead and not a second sooner, it just drives the papers mad not knowing wengers next move absolute genius at it he is at leading the press a merry dance and i love it am certain wenger will get who we need not more not less
Yes we owe the banks around 230 million it's a long term loan we pay back around 25 million a year, this season 2014/15 we ar going to turn ower around 330 + million And our outgoing is going to be around 220 million or less, this season and the next 5 seasons we will be malikng around 110 million profit a year, we had 170million in the bank in April which was confirmed by the club we have spent some money on players 70 + million leaves you with 100 million in the bank then in June we recived 3 new sponsership deal worth around 130 million (wether or not it was paid lump sump or spread across the season to lower profit margin that I haven't looked at) all in all we can spend ready cash ower 200 milion if we realy want we can spend double and more of that sum and we still be within the FFP rules becouse they look at accounts 3 years acumalation
You're not focusing on the facts here, Dortmund bought a world class striker for the price of an academy player and then replaced him with another top class striker for less than what we paid Chambers for.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
If the Arsenal manager was a bit less like a poker player on his last hand, all in, and with his house and car riding on the result, or if he had actually done a bit more of what the football media had been expecting, then they would not have to start grasping at straws quite so desperately.
If Wenger was anywhere as astute and malleable in his tactics & management then he would instead of making excuses of all his best players leaving the club would've signed hard working gems from the lesser teams and motivated them enough to have grabbed the league at least thrice by now off his «Invincibles» credentials.
why buy these players knowing full well there is a restriction on their wage demands, 200,000 should be the maximum, maybe 210,000 but any less despite the structure and the financial principle then why buy the players at all, just run around the squad and tell them all to be consistent.
So if a club like Arsenal wants a player at a club with lesser financial capabilities, then Arsenal could get the player.
If Alexis contract wasn't so low then I would be surprised if AFC would listen to offers less near double the offers we read about now... Silent Stan doesn't have to sell the player to get a loan from a bank... He only needs the share prices to back him in his business deals.
But with our top players available and the defence only needing to worry about Adebayor or Soldado, then I really can't see this being any less than a massacre in Arsenal's favour....
If the Slams go back down to 16 seeds, then paying attention to how the players ranked 25 - 40 are playing seems like it'll be less entertaining for us year - round tennis fans.
If he fields Ozil, then that'll be like a player less i.e 10 against 11.
happy we won but lets not kid ourselves leaving this guy incharge another year or we will be hear once again for sure.happy we won, well played sanchez and wow for a player not in wengers favorite joel was remarkable and shows wenger as a manager is donedone how do u drop such a player its shame.anything less than third then this season is awfull.
for me I woukd have told Sanchez and Ox they were not playing u less they signed a new contract or window was closed... he chose to show them he wanta them but they both used it for their own purposes... As a result the whole pre season was lost as Wenger has played Lacazette and Kolasinac and what must they have thought not to be picked in such a big game... Wenger should then and always only pick players ready to work hard for the team... yesterday also showed we do nt need Ozil to play all the time... if he had come on 2nd half yesterday along with Sanchez the Chelsea players would be thinking WTF at our bench quality
If this is true then we can only hope that Wenger and the board have learned from their struggles to bring players in this time, and that the big spending from the likes of Man City and United will mean that we have less competition for our transfer targets in January.
Walcott is only a better finisher and maybe a little bid faster, however, sterling has qualities like dribbling and penetrating, passing, and less injury prone player... Actually players like sterling would help us to break down organized and deep defense line (yesterday game as an example)... Ox is more similar to sterling but you all know Ox is very very injury prone player... I think if sterling to leave liverpool for an English club, then it will be for city or chelsea because they can afford better offer and salary...
If Arsenal had been a little bit more determined and a little bit less parsimonious in the transfer window last summer, then the France international Yohan Cabaye would have been an Arsenal player already.
If you really want a player and your offer is less than 8 % away from the asking price and that gap is less than 5 million then I think in some cases you pay the asking price.
AFC have been buying players of lesser quality, now if Wenger has final say on all transfers then Wenger had final say on this Jan window... Or he has not had final say all these years but influence which is different.
Apparently Leicester had a # 19 million bid rejected for the Ox... if Arsenal do let this player leave for less than # 30 million then they would be wise to incert a buy back clause... just incase!?
If wenger has already sold off and.replaced sanogo, wellington and Walcott (who are all less worthy of a place in the 25) and he still wants to strengthen his attack, plus he can bring in another player better than chamberlain then why not?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z