Not exact matches
Comparatively, Saleen's least expensive current offering, the Mustang S281 3V, starts at $ 45,999 and features a
less powerful V - 8 (only 335 hp), the Racecraft suspension, and extensive exterior modifications such as a new grille, fascias, window trim, and
graphics.
And, Wii's
graphics were generally a problem for anyone that wasn't a Nintendo fanboy or a casual noob, which is probably one of the many reasons why the Wii U didn't sell this gen, because the core gamers weren't going to fall for the same trick twice (and the casuals and noobs had moved onto even
less powerful and
less hardcore but much more ubiquitous gaming systems already).
It has three
powerful core processors which pump out 720p / 1080i output (translation:
graphics look great), 16x9 cinematic aspect ratio (translation: it's sort of like the cinema), anti-aliasing for smooth textures (translation: characters look
less like chimps and more like people), full surround sound and DVD playback right out of the box.
More detailed
graphics began to appear in arcades and even on the
less -
powerful home consoles, more clearly depicting recognizable objects and yes, even characters.
I haven't played those, but since they were on
less powerful systems the
graphics wouldn't be as big an issue for me.
There are nearly 80 million GeForce customers who currently own a GPU
less powerful than a 960GTX and therefore are ready to upgrade in order to experience better than PS4
graphics.
Yeah, that's basically what Nintendo argued against when releasing the original Wii — the
graphics processor wasn't that much more
powerful than the Gamecube, certainly much
less so than the Xbox 360 and PS3, but they wanted to focus on creating innovative, new experiences rather than just spending 50 million dollars on HD textures and making Ocarina of Time over and over.
It's only the Nvidia GeForce MX150 GPU, which is a step up from integrated
graphics but much
less powerful than more gaming - oriented chips.
Their screens aren't high - resolution or high - quality enough, their processors are
less powerful, and they don't have the dedicated
graphics card that a laptop needs to be able to handle
graphics processing alongside other work.
You could plug a laptop with
less -
powerful graphics hardware into your TV and use it to stream games from your
powerful desktop gaming rig.
In comparison to the Maxwell - based
graphics chip that comes with the newer Tegra X1, the Kepler GPU is
less powerful, but it trounces almost everything else around when it comes to rendering 3D for gaming.
We expect battery life would improve by an hour, or more, if the system was optioned a
less powerful processor, Quadro M1000M
graphics, and 1080p display.
The Intel Core i5 - 8250U processor running at 1.6 GHz with integrated
graphics should be more than adequate for these tasks, even though you can find more
powerful processors for
less money in consumer ultraportables.
Though it's amazingly small at 14nm, it packs a
powerful punch providing you crystal clear
graphics, seamless streaming of hi - def movies or staying connected at ridiculously fast speeds on
less battery power.
The Pro is even packed with an Intel Core m3 processor with Intel HD
Graphics so it's a little more
powerful than your typical Chromebook (the Chromebook Plus features a slightly
less powerful OP1 hexa - core CPU that was designed specifically for Chromebooks), but all that comes at a price as the Chromebook Pro is not the most inexpensive laptop either.
Both will sport an eighth - generation Intel Core i7 processor, while the Notebook 3 will have a
less powerful Nvidia MX110
graphics card compared with the MX150 in the Notebook 5.