That means fewer premium bids,
less pressure on firms to shape up, and more stitch - ups of minority shareholders.
Not exact matches
In Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 98 the Supreme Court formalized this premise into a doctrinal test.The case involved cigarette manufacturing, an industry dominated by six
firms.99 Liggett, one of the six, introduced a line of generic cigarettes, which it sold for about 30 %
less than the price of branded cigarettes.100 Liggett alleged that when it became clear that its generics were diverting business from branded cigarettes, Brown & Williamson, a competing manufacturer, began selling its own generics at a loss.101 Liggett sued, claiming that Brown & Williamson's tactic was designed to
pressure Liggett to raise prices
on its generics, thus enabling Brown & Williamson to maintain high profits
on branded cigarettes.
14 % of respondents believe that insider trading practices in the alternative investment industry have become
less prevalent since the FBI arrested Raj Rajaratnam and scared the bejeezus out of everyone, a noticeable drop from January 2016 when 25 % of respondents felt this way; 37 % of respondents think the news of arrests and convictions there has had little impact
on insider trading because those who engage in such practices think they are smarter than everyone else and will never get caught, compared with 39 % of respondents in 2016; and 49 % of respondents believe the influx of money into funds in recent years and the explosion in the number of hedge fund
firms has put enough
pressure on fund managers that there will always be a few desperate enough to try anything, including insider trading, a significant increase from the 36 % of respondents who felt this way in the Roundtable's previous survey
on this topic.
The medium -
firm mattresses may put
less pressure on the shoulders and hips, allowing for a more natural sleeping position, often in the fetal position.
Withdrawal of brokerage
firms from the equity research business + downward
pressure on fees + investor reallocation toward index investing have made traditional active management considerably
less lucrative than it was during my working career.
Again,
pressure is
on large
firms to cut legal costs and become more efficient with
less time and money to work with.
Innumerable deadlines, constant
pressure to do more in
less time and increased competition in the marketplace all make demands
on firms to cut costs and optimise resources.
All in all, interviewees went
on to tell us that «this is a great city for doing interesting work with a little of the
pressure taken off you — there's
less of a national or global spotlight than in some of the headquarter offices of larger
firms in New York.»
Top partners agree the
pressure to deliver more for
less will intensify as the fast - moving market continues to keep
firms on their toes
As Kovalan says, law
firm leaders have blamed «more for
less» and decreasing budgets for
pressure on firm revenues.
Ever since large law
firm salaries for new associates jumped to $ 160,000 back in January, we've heard commentary from a variety of constituencies, ranging from (see this post) law
firm recruiters, warning that increased billables will place more
pressure on associates, to lawyers, arguing that increased salaries demand concommitant salary raises for the judiciary, to (see this post) law
firm economists, suggesting that associate salaries are proportionately lower than ever when viewed in the context of their relationship to profits per partner, to law
firm marketers who view increased rates as opening opportunities for
less expensive, midsized
firms.
Outside law
firms will find themselves competing for
less work, which will put a downward
pressure on fees.
Similarly, restraints
on using outside counsel have not only forced corporate counsel to do more with
less, but also put
pressure on private law
firms to contain fees.
As clients increase the
pressure on law
firms to do more in
less time, legal project management has become an effective way for
firms to meet clients» demands.
writes «Law
firms today face increased
pressure to do «more for
less» resulting in rapidly growing interest in compelling technology - augmented hybrid offerings: focused
on process - oriented work, applied at scale, leveraging technology to produce effective solutions that address the GCs evolving role as manager of legal spend and supply chain risk.