Sentences with phrase «less problem from»

However, there appears to be less problem from high carbohydrate levels than from high protein levels in dogs, so most dog foods are high in carbohydrates and lower in protein.

Italian teams in general are capable with dealing with aerial balls, our defenders back then needed more help and less problems from the GK.

Not exact matches

Low literacy and essential skills is a compounding problem because low - skilled adults benefit less from other training that sits atop basic skills — and their skills remain weak or deteriorate over time.

This problem resulted from old, less strict rules about data collection by developers that Facebook updated in 2014, but Facebook shared the data with Kogan before that.

Sherry Turkle, an MIT psychologist and author of «Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other,» argues there's a closer analogy that should help solve the problem of tech overuse.

But more setbacks could make this season's problems look, a couple of years from now, less like faltering than foreshadowing.

Other scenarios are less clear: A doctor states that a person died from respiratory problems, and then mentions in the death certificate that the hospital didn't have enough oxygen tanks.

[158] Other causes include the rise in non-cash benefits as a share of worker compensation (which aren't counted in CPS income data), immigrants entering the labor force, statistical distortions including the use of different inflation adjusters by the BLS and CPS, productivity gains being skewed toward less labor - intensive sectors, income shifting from labor to capital, a skill gap - driven wage disparity, productivity being falsely inflated by hidden technology - driven depreciation increases and import price measurement problems, and / or a natural period of adjustment following an income surge during aberrational postwar circumstances.

This nascent AI technique — which requires no input data, substantially less computing power, and in which the evolutionary - like AI learns from itself — could soon evolve to enable its application to real - world problems in the natural sciences.

The biggest problem with making public predictions - of which there are plenty to choose from - is that the more times you say something the less likely you are to change your mind.

In The Road Less Travelled, M Scott Peck explains how a lot of us flee from the pain of solving problems and end up either neurotic or with character disorders (i.e. the neurotic assumes too much responsability and the person with a character disorder not enough).

This made them 56 per cent less likely to seek help from a medical professional - making them less likely to get better - and 70 per cent less likely to speak about their problems generally.

By extension, evolving from less advanced life forms is distasteful to those same individuals, as that necessitates a point in evolution at which humans are not really humans at all in the modern sense, which then brings up problems such as «do slugs go to heaven?»

Another problem arises from the church's increasingly local identity: If laity care less and less about the denomination as a larger entity, then clergy will be the guardians of denominationalism.

By approaching the problem from this more critical stance it may be hoped that a less subjectivist, more balanced account of the place of mind and nature in the general scheme of things will result.

In consequence, the next decade will enable the churches to bring together that which, at their best, they tend to do well (providing persons with a faith perspective from which to cope with the enduring problems of life) and that which they do less effectively (corporate and social ministry).

I tend to think we should have less religion imposed on us from the masses, thus recruiting from the major religions is required, otherwise we get into problems and wars which are heavily faith - based and have little or no humanistic value.

You also might realize that the vast majority of those of us with «deep psychiatric issues» (your words) have no problem at all with atheistic beliefs (and they are beliefs — you are choosing to believe the universe sprang from nothingness, which is no less absurd than a benevolent creator).

The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should raise questions about the meaning of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.

As long as he's not stealing from the church and ministering to the less fortunate, I have no problem with it.

These problems are less severe for black theology, as a consequence of contributions from scholars with long tenure in the academy such as Archie Smith and Edward Wimberly.

From the article: He said: «The sin of lust isn't just a mistake, a mess - up or a problem... it is no less than an act of sin that is reprehensible to God and nothing short of honestly confessing and repenting of that sins is good enough for God.»

This was, if anything, even farther from the truth about the special problem of the modern middle - class American woman than the Freudian - type psychologizing, and even less helpful in offering her an understanding of it.

The field of imagination at any rate is broad, ranging from automatic, instinctual, or reflex actions (in which the problem of meaning is virtually, but not entirely, non-existent), to more or less habitual modes of response to «natural signs,» and rising ultimately to sophisticated conceptual activity and various poetic or secondary forms of meaning — making in cultural and social significations.19 In the higher reaches of semiotic activity an increase in imaginative freedom is accompanied by a greater risk of error.

The problem is that they are often displaced from traditional homes and are becoming less and less able to meet their own needs.

Finally, a more intractable problem stems from trapper suspicion that the animal protectionists will never be satisfied with anything less than a total trap ban.

The Bible definitely makes wonderful sense apart from Dispensationalism, which is a recent (less than 200 years old) theological innovation that causes far more problems than it purports to solve.

From another perspective, the problem might be identified as one of damaged relationships among members, the repair of which might be found in building up a fellowship that encourages greater love and less animosity.

Perhaps the pope should have chosen a less «brusque» (his characterization of the emperor's statement) example from history, but his obvious point was to show that the problem he was addressing is not new.

This is partly because the problems of the Church today are less quotable and dependent on idiotic liturgies or heretical textbooks than was the case from the late 1960s and through to the 90s.

Letters and Papers from Prison also contains a report on prison life revealing the sadistic character of some of its guards, the injustice in treatment of prisoners, the inhumanity toward the less important prisoners, and the growing problem of food.

What happens in a crisis, or in any less dramatic problem situation involving unexpected, puzzling or discordant experiences, is this sudden shift of control of an ongoing activity to a higher level in the many - leveled hierarchy, from a semi-automatic to a more conscious performance, because the decision to be made or the problem to be solved is beyond the competence of the automatic pilot and must be referred to higher quarters.

Hasker's third proposition is that for the problem of divine non-intervention to be a real problem, «we must be able to identify specific kinds of cases in which God morally ought to intervene but does not» Many critics of (traditional) theism probably already have a more or less vague list of such cases, which might include genocidal events, such as the Nazi holocaust and the Rwandan massacre; wars; large - scale natural disasters; conditions of chronic poverty, in which millions of children die from starvation or are permanently stunted because of inadequate protein; the sexual molestation of children, which often leaves them psychologically scarred for the rest of their lives; death preceded by long, painful illnesses, such as cancer or AIDS, or by mind - destroying conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease; and the kinds of events described by Dostoyevski, such as the soldier using his pistol to get a mother's baby to giggle with delight and then blowing its brains out.

The Christologies of the various forms of the kerygmata known to us from the New Testament and Christian history are not necessarily coherent with one another, still less necessarily consistent with the teaching of the historical Jesus, and historical research may well raise problems for a form of the kerygma, as, for example, research into the eschatology of Jesus raised problems for the older liberalism.

A solution to the problem in less than two minutes for those Muslims who are not suffering from the Three B Syndrome i.e. Bred, Born and Brainwashed in Islam.

Less prominent than the League of Nations, but issuing more clearly from Christianity, has been the Institute of Pacific Relations, an unofficial body for the study of the problems of the Pacific, with the purpose of bringing the leading minds of all the nations involved to bear upon their peaceful solution.

Recently I've been trying to do better in staying away from refined sugars, as I've been having some problems with my skin — I've even been eating less honey!

the problem is the complacency that has gotten hold of Wenger's brain due to lack of pressure from the top has infected the whole club... Wenger knows his job is as safe and forth knoxx so LOSING IS AN OPTION in the scheme of things, there is always another game to make things right, always another season to try again and this, whether consciously or otherwise is a malaise that has infected the player» a pysche... I have said this so many times, Fergie won the league with a squad that less than half the quality our present squad possess and in a tougher more competitive seaaon

Ramsey and Elneny were picked to help soak up pressure, which they did, I have no problem people saying they want more from them but there was two more forwards on that pitch that done a whole lot less than they did, the reason for their (Ramsey Elneny) inclusion was a defensive standpoint, it's the offensive standpoint that completely let us down.

I can only see two solutions to this problem, One is to have less international friendlys and the other logical way around this would be to up the squad numbers of the top teams in Europe, From 24 to 34 giving more room to rotating and resting players.

Still, on this basis, with so many quality attacking players all ticking together so fluently, that never looked like happening in this game and may be less of a problem in general from now on.

I don't have a problem with negativity from Falcon fans because 1) the team justifies it like no other, 2) if we required all fans to have rose colored glasses there would be no need for a «Falcoholic» discussion site, and 3) negative fans aren't less supportive of the team just because they're pessimistic.

The BAD news is that we are likely to lose about 2 weeks worth of comments from you guys, but I am hoping you will appreciate that it will be worth it in the end as the site will load so much faster and you will have less problems logging in in future.

my problem with AW is that for years he resisted to buy good players because of a million or two difference from asking price today's market those players are worth triple, we could of had a great team with possibly wining the EPL twice and possibly semis or final of CL, if he had just spent the money in the bank, Chelsea are in dept around 850 Million pounds (possible the bulk to Abromovich) and same for Man - United and few more, we are the only club that is cash rich with funds available around hidden 350 million and more accumulating every season, how i know this because i look at their end of year accounts outgoings and income there is around 100 to 120 million less outgoings then income, we can easily spend 700 Million in the summer and we will be well in with FFP rules and only have 350m to pay in two years which we can with bigger and higher sponsorship coming any day now

that is the big question.How long do you want to keep on living with problems in the team without attempting to solve them.Without a doubt you and I know this and we know what we must do.You must ensure that you have the right players before talking about cohesion and injuries.As at now I look at the arsenal team and say if arsenal do nt solve their problems it will be worse and continue to haunt them.We need quality in the team as much as cohesion and staying injury free is important.Quality is however the most important.That differentiates a bigger club from a lesser club yes «quality».

Their quick - fire solution to the problem they initially inherited was to be rid of a manager which had pulled so many rabbits from the hat during his highly successful tenure at the club, and replace him with a manager of less stature and absolutely no experience of managing at the highest level, in the most demanding of leagues.

We are less fit, we make less sprints, we cover less ground per player than (this season) any other team in the league, we make more errors to leading to goals, we have more players booked and sent off, we have more injuries than most clubs, we are less likely (since Payet) to do as we did last night and come from a losing position to win, we lose more games from winning positions than any other club (last season and this), the facts are damning to Slav, the biggest surprise is that our Chairmen run multiple businesses yet they don't seem to link these things together and realise that the manager and or the coaching staff are the problem.

The biggest problem created by Santi Cazorla's ongoing absence is a lack of quick forward distribution from midfield and the more pedestrian the pace in Arsenal's passing, the less effective Mesut Ozil, Alexis Sanchez and Theo Walcott become.

That's what I'm saying too - I think that the real problems that have lead us so far away from breastfeeding are less to do with formula companies and more to do with the completely screwed up North American birth culture where under - informed medical staff are the ones at the steering wheel and we have succumbed to the over-sexualization of breasts and other non-female-friendly cultural ideas that have made breastfeeding «gross», «offensive» or «unnecessary».

They WANT to nurse because it temporarily calms the reflux symptoms - sooths the burning of the reflux from the fresh milk as well as moving stuff DOWN the digestive track instead of up - but may perpetuate the problem and in a mother less committed to breastfeeding actually lead to early weaning.