Sentences with phrase «less problems at»

It becomes less a problem at close range, assuming you're more or less facing the enemy's general direction; as a result, fast monsters and bosses become considerably more difficult for players unfamiliar with the original game.

Not exact matches

The difficulty of the crypto problems that mining solves starts to increase, and the older graphics cards become less efficient and slower at solving them, all while consuming the same amount of electricity.

After all, Karpelès has lately been less than enthusiastic about Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, telling Fortune he's had «enough of cryptocurrency» between all his problems at Mt. Gox, and has essentially washed his hands clean of it.

If you look at the problem backwards, you'd think about all the things you could do to create less innovation.

According to Bob Sutton, organizational behavior expert at Stanford's School of Engineering (via HBR), «Scaling is actually a problem of less.»

Hilary Stout illustrated this problem in The New York Times in June: «After all, the millennial generation has less wealth and more debt than other generations did at the same age, thanks to student loans and the lingering effects of the deep recession,» she wrote.

According to The New York Times, Giuliani «used his clout with the Justice Department to press the federal authorities to offer a less onerous punishment to the company after allegations that security problems at its warehouses might have contributed to black market sales.»

Poor health can be expensive too, and stress makes people less productive at work, which causes other problems, said Joshua Riff, Medical Director at Target Corporation, at the Harvard stress forum.

«They have this incredible insight into the problem at hand,» she says, which makes them appear less like a shill.

These more general biases and hurdles, along with the issue of male confusion at women's needs and problems, help explain why femaleentrepreneurs take home a pathetically small share of venture capital — less than 5 percent.

But it is less clear whether Polman can succeed in convincing his peers in the business world that it's their job to fix those problems — or at least, whether he can succeed in doing that during his remaining time as CEO of Unilever.

The problem, Loncar explained to Fortune in an interview at ASCO earlier this month, is that even diversified, less risky ETFs and indices like the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (NBI) may not be the most effective way to invest in the field.

At a minimum, applying companies must have a full - time founding team, a bold vision for tackling a real problem, technologically driven solutions and less than $ 1 million raised.

Bad loans as a share of their total portfolio remains low, at less than 2.5 percent, but economists believe the figure understates the problem because banks often extend the payment dates for problem debt.

The problem opponents cite is that many of the institutions that contributed to the downturn were capitalized at significantly less than the SIFI threshold — namely 250 billion dollars.

Third, keeping rates at zero leaves the Fed with less room to lower rates in response to problems than it would have if it increased rates.

While some of this will involve looking at potential vendors, this stage is more about how I will solve my problem and less about who will solve my problem.

I'd put that probability at less than 5 % because of all the momentum and talent currently focused on solving the problem.

In theory, at least, this can be a win - win - win solution to the problem of underwater homes: Homeowners instantly reduce their monthly payments and begin building positive equity in their homes; mortgage lenders benefit because above - water homeowners are far less likely to default and the foreclosure process is very expensive for banks; and the process helps speed recovery for the entire economy.

By extension, evolving from less advanced life forms is distasteful to those same individuals, as that necessitates a point in evolution at which humans are not really humans at all in the modern sense, which then brings up problems such as «do slugs go to heaven?»

Similarly sizable majorities said that h0m0s are generally less happy than heter0s 73 % and less capable of mature, loving relationships, 60 % A total of 70 % said that h0m0 problems have more to do with their own inner conflicts than with stigmatization by society at large

• The Kabuki dance between activist group outrage and administrative prostration at the University of Virginia and elsewhere suggests to me that the university has become less and less capable of addressing our culture's problems (and successes) in a serious way.

In fact, as will become all too clear, Deleuze's response to this problem is often no less vague, obscure, at times near tautologous, than Whitehead's own.

So no, people with religion are much less adept than nonbelievers at coming up with creative solutions to problems.

In consequence, the next decade will enable the churches to bring together that which, at their best, they tend to do well (providing persons with a faith perspective from which to cope with the enduring problems of life) and that which they do less effectively (corporate and social ministry).

You also might realize that the vast majority of those of us with «deep psychiatric issues» (your words) have no problem at all with atheistic beliefs (and they are beliefs — you are choosing to believe the universe sprang from nothingness, which is no less absurd than a benevolent creator).

We need to probe more deeply into the kind of problem here presented for Christian thought for nothing less than the good news of Christianity is at stake.

This makes sense to you, although it makes no sense at all to me (and I would predict it makes no sense to the other 5 billion of us non Muslims), I would have less problems if it were applied to all citizen of that country, both men and women, those in power and the working class, the rulers and the ruled, but that is not the case.

While good at showing us problems, The Servant and the Ladder is perhaps less good at finding solutions; it remains, however, a valuable exploration of a very perplexing area of ethics.

The young lady — an RE teacher, no less - just «couldn't see any problem» with two men getting married, and couldn't see any need to think about it too deeply — no brain action required on this one at all.

The problem is that people who behave the way Christ did — taking care of the less fortunate, living their life as an example of God's love — do not, by definition, stand up and say «look at me, I'm a Christian — see how superior I am!»

The field of imagination at any rate is broad, ranging from automatic, instinctual, or reflex actions (in which the problem of meaning is virtually, but not entirely, non-existent), to more or less habitual modes of response to «natural signs,» and rising ultimately to sophisticated conceptual activity and various poetic or secondary forms of meaning — making in cultural and social significations.19 In the higher reaches of semiotic activity an increase in imaginative freedom is accompanied by a greater risk of error.

When I look at oldline denominations, I am less worriedried about their numerical and demographic troubles than I am about the sorts of institutions they have become, especialli» as they struggle with their quantitative problems.

This becomes especially evident when we consider some of our everyday acronyms: at one time cancer was the «Big C»; children have «to do a BM»; while «syphilis» may be difficult to utter, «VD» is less of a problem; the «SOB» may hand out a lot of «BS»; «HO» is to be dreaded; and of course we have our «F --» word.

Whether such instances are more or less frequent at any particular place or time makes no difference to the fact, which is taken so much as a matter of course, that traditional moral theology is scarcely really aware of the problem of principle which is in fact raised by it.

A problem that has vexed Catholics and others in the pro-life movement, however, is the question whether it is legitimate to support a less than perfectly protective legislative proposal restricting abortion, euthanasia, and like injustices, when the only politically realistic alternative at the moment is a proposal that is even less protective of the rights of the unborn, elderly, or handicapped.

x) Orthodox (Advaita) Vedanta realizes that substantial pluralism is at best less true than substantial monism; but it fails, in my opinion, to see that the radical pluralism of actual entities and the radical monism of God or Nirvana (however one distinguishes these) are the two poles of the real problem, not the ordinary substantial pluralism of common sense, a compromise which bars the path to the highest ethical and spiritual insight.

At an age when telephones have given way to smartphones that are used less for phoning than for email, texting, and social media, the problem is exacerbated.

Giroud misses more than he hits, Walcott has NEVER delivered his expected talent, Welbeck will NEVER be the striker to score 20 goals a season Coqellin will NOT go a whole season injury or suspension free, Sanchez and Ozil WILL have down period during the season, all teams have these problems to a greater or lesser degree but most of the top teams will address these problems and players either inprove or are sold and replaced with better or at least more consistant players, NOT Wenger he keeps doing the same thing over and over with the same players and he expects a different result but gets the same outvome time and time again, yet its ALWAYS someone else's fault be it the Ref or the linesman or the opposition or bad luck or whatever and whoever and its NEVER the fact that HE has done nothing to change the situation and LOOKS LIKELY to not change it next time around.

If Walcott who is of significantly less skill and quality has managed to con his way into a 10 year stay at Arsenal then Wilshere should really have no problem convincing the boss he deserves a new contract.

Anyway, at the kit launch, there was an interview with Santi Cazorla and he mentioned some obvious problems we had throughout the season like the missed points against lesser opposition (he mentioned Hull City I believe).

it does not matter if the player is cheap or not the bigger problem would be that very player will be on our books for four years so he better be good, that's why when I look at Chelsea and city these clubs throw players out with in a season un less that player is expensive or injured, so waiting to sign wclass 4 years is better than signing just to compete for a season to complain about more signings

In everything in life there must be a balance but for now its Profit (shareholders happy) over trophy (fans happyness) and in accounting where one side is less the other side then there will be problem at the long run.....

Overall it's less a problem than I thought it to be at the time.

and we'll have less of a problem at the back, giving the back 4 more time to organize.

40m (kondogbia + sokratis) couldve given us a squad that was expected to win the title and enter the later stages of the champions League but arsene was too indecisive, subtitutions could've given us wins at leicester and city but arsene never subs on time, less than 24 hrs ago we got pummeled because he doesn't rotate, I think it isn't too hard to c where the problem is.....

Although Mourinho will be looking at their defensive problems as an issue too, the fact that they have scored just 17 goals in 15 league games tells its own story, as that is significantly less than many of their rivals including Manchester United who have been lambasted all year for their style of football and lack of goals.

my problem with AW is that for years he resisted to buy good players because of a million or two difference from asking price today's market those players are worth triple, we could of had a great team with possibly wining the EPL twice and possibly semis or final of CL, if he had just spent the money in the bank, Chelsea are in dept around 850 Million pounds (possible the bulk to Abromovich) and same for Man - United and few more, we are the only club that is cash rich with funds available around hidden 350 million and more accumulating every season, how i know this because i look at their end of year accounts outgoings and income there is around 100 to 120 million less outgoings then income, we can easily spend 700 Million in the summer and we will be well in with FFP rules and only have 350m to pay in two years which we can with bigger and higher sponsorship coming any day now

that is the big question.How long do you want to keep on living with problems in the team without attempting to solve them.Without a doubt you and I know this and we know what we must do.You must ensure that you have the right players before talking about cohesion and injuries.As at now I look at the arsenal team and say if arsenal do nt solve their problems it will be worse and continue to haunt them.We need quality in the team as much as cohesion and staying injury free is important.Quality is however the most important.That differentiates a bigger club from a lesser club yes «quality».

This may be less of a problem at mega-rich Chelsea, who enjoy the backing of wealthy Russian owner Roman Abramovich, though it seems Mourinho is already concerned about the way things have gone this summer, with only Radamel Falcao brought in on loan so far, and The Sun adding that another deal for Asmir Begovic could be on the way.