Sentences with phrase «less public support for»

Some veteran climate scientists, while eager for cuts in heat - trapping emissions, warn that descriptions of climatic tipping points or thresholds could backfire in the absence of evidence, leading to less public support for action.

While it is likely that there was less public support for the wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq than for...

There is less public support for raising taxes on higher - income households.

Not exact matches

Despite SIFMA's public statements that it supports a uniform fiduciary rule for all advisors, the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard believes that the brokerage industry group is really advocating a less stringent brokers -LSB-...]

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

In the same way that the energy industry today is mistakenly identified with «Big Oil» (Exxon, Chevron, et al.), when it is in fact conducted predominantly by smaller independent companies most readers will have never heard of, modern capitalism is not largely the purview of Apple and Walmart, but rather of small, privately owned businesses with less than one hundred employees providing services or products the public wants or needs in order to support the families of the owners and provide jobs for their workers.

Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions

Ten years later, post-9 / 11, the public was again amenable to the allied move into Afghanistan (74 per cent supported it) but there was markedly less enthusiasm to go into Iraq for a second time (54 per cent).

«Farage has called for a bar on the children of legal immigrants from public schools and health services, has said women are — and I quote — worth less than men, and supports scrapping laws that prevent employers from discriminating based on race.

The New York Democrat acknowledged his wrongdoing, but he campaigned in the days before the House vote for his colleagues to support a reprimand — a lesser punishment that would still require a House vote but not mandate a public dressing - down — on the basis that the ethics committee had not deemed his actions corrupt.

Lack of diplomacy has lead to way less public international support for the USA.

The more that Labour insists the support for Ed Miliband is rock solid, the less the public are inclined to believe the party.

It also comes as mainline Democrats show support for the Occupy movement, a more or less grassroots demonstration that captured public sentiment on income inequality and taxes after more traditional liberal groups failed to do so.

Long Island school districts lack a reliable funding stream for public pre-K and serve less than one - third of an estimated 28,000 eligible 4 - year - old children, even as support grows for a universal program available to all children.

Whilst a recent Fabian poll suggested the public's appetite for fairness is increasing - 75 % support the new top tax rate - they remain less enthusiastic about the notion of equality.

«For too long, corporations have exploited loopholes to avoid paying their fair share of taxes, and the result has been less revenue to support stronger public schools and colleges for all New York students,» said NYSUT Executive President Andrew PallotFor too long, corporations have exploited loopholes to avoid paying their fair share of taxes, and the result has been less revenue to support stronger public schools and colleges for all New York students,» said NYSUT Executive President Andrew Pallotfor all New York students,» said NYSUT Executive President Andrew Pallotta.

He stopped short of calling for a medical boycott of these facilities because, he said, it is less evil to be inside the system bearing witness and providing medical care, and public opinion would not support such a boycott.

With more money for development of novel designs and public financial support for construction — perhaps as part of a clean energy portfolio standard that lumps in all low - carbon energy sources, not just renewables or a carbon tax — nuclear could be one of the pillars of a three - pronged approach to cutting greenhouse gas emissions: using less energy to do more (or energy efficiency), low - carbon power, and electric cars (as long as they are charged with electricity from clean sources, not coal burning).

Clara Lovett, the American Association for Higher Education's president, warned that less prestigious state universities «don't have private endowments, they're getting less and less financial support from the public sector, particularly state legislatures — and it's only going to get worse.

When asked about support for a proposal «that would allow low - and moderate - income four - year - old children to be given the opportunity to attend a preschool program, with the government paying the tuition,» no less than 60 percent of the public responded favorably, with just 27 percent voicing opposition.

And when provided with the actual numbers on salaries and spending, the researchers say, Americans experience «sticker shock» — and become much less likely to support an increase in government funding for public schools.

For example, the fact that K12 schools spend $ 715 per student less on support services than public schools in the same states is interpreted as a «cost advantage» for the virtual schooFor example, the fact that K12 schools spend $ 715 per student less on support services than public schools in the same states is interpreted as a «cost advantage» for the virtual schoofor the virtual schools.

In the just - released 2014 Ednext survey of a nationally representative sample of the general public, no less than 68 % of the public registers support for the following (if the material in brackets is deleted):

While public school buildings are publicly funded, charter schools have no financial resources for building, renting, or renovating, and must find them or take them from the funds they get for teaching, which are in any case less than the support the public schools receive.

In another sign of less - than - wholehearted support for an education spending spree, only 35 percent of the public says taxes should increase to fund the schools.

The public is somewhat less inclined to favor vouchers for low - income families in 2014 than it was a year ago, but it is a bit more willing to lend support to universal vouchers for all families.

Respondents show less support for the use of smartphones in classrooms, however, with just 26 percent of the public supporting students using their own smartphones in the classroom for educational purposes.

Hillary Clinton delivered plenty of applause lines Tuesday in a speech to the nation's largest teachers union at a gathering in Washington, calling for less standardized testing, more support for vulnerable children and more respect and pay for public school educators.

In contrast to the general public, teachers are less likely to support school choice, testing, and school accountability, and more likely to support higher teacher salaries and raising taxes to pay for them.

Moreover, advocates should keep in mind that school districts in participating states access Medicaid dollars directly to pay for medically necessary services for students with disabilities.70 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires that districts provide all necessary services and resources to afford every child a «free appropriate public education,» and some medically related supports qualify for Medicaid reimbursement.71 With less Medicaid funding statewide to meet that guarantee, states and districts would have to siphon money from other education funding streams to afford necessary medical services that support the learning of students with disabilities.

«For every dollar invested in high - quality, comprehensive programs supporting children... there is a $ 7 - $ 10 return to society in decreased need for special education services, higher graduation and employment rates, less crime, less use of the public welfare system, and better health.&raqFor every dollar invested in high - quality, comprehensive programs supporting children... there is a $ 7 - $ 10 return to society in decreased need for special education services, higher graduation and employment rates, less crime, less use of the public welfare system, and better health.&raqfor special education services, higher graduation and employment rates, less crime, less use of the public welfare system, and better health.»

Specifically, they say, «The research literature over the last quarter century has consistently supported the notion that having high expectations for all, including clear and public standards, is one key to closing the achievement gap between advantaged and less advantaged students and for raising the overall achievement of all students.

WHEREAS, the OSPP is financed with per pupil payments that would typically go to support MPS, leaving less money available for already under - funded public schools; and

Parent Involvement in the School Program 2112.00 Parent Involvement Plan 2112.00 R1 Part - Time Classified Employees 6335.00 Part - Time Employees 6325.12 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Annuities 3921.00 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Annuities 3921.00 R1 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Annuities Approved Companies 3921.00 R3 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Annuity Deduction Agreement 3921.00 R1E1 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Annuity Requirements for all Vendors 3921.00 R2 Payroll Deductions - Tax Sheltered Life Insurance 3922.00 Performance Contract (Memorandum) 7116.30 E4 Performance Contract (Memorandum) 6222.10 E4 Performance Contract - $ 1,000 or less 7116.30 E2 Performance Contract - $ 1,000 or less 6222.10 E2 Performance Contract - over $ 1,000 not more than $ 5,000 6222.10 E3 Performance Contract - over $ 1,000, not more than $ 5,000 7116.30 E3 Performance Contract - Procedures 7116.30 R1 Performance Contract - Procedures 6222.10 R1 Performance Contract - Wage / Payment & Vendor / Contractor Determination 7116.30 E5 Performance Contract - Wage / Payment & Vendor / Contractor Determination 6222.10 E5 Performance Contracts 6222.10 Performance Contracts 7116.30 Personal Leave - All Employees 6225.00 R3 Personal Property Authorization 3934.00 E1 Personal Purchases by Employees 3872.00 Personnel Files 6410.00 Personnel Files 6410.00 R1 Petty Cash Purchase 3820.00 Physical Assaults and Threats 5610.00 Physical Examinations 6430.00 Physical Examinations 6430.00 R1 Positive Behavior Supports 8400.00 R1 Positive Behavior Supports and Interventions 8400.00 Post-Issuance Compliance for Tax Exempt and Tax Advantaged Obligations 3510.00 Post-Issuance Compliance for Tax Exempt and Tax Advantaged Obligations 3510.00 R1 Probationary Classified Employees 6343.00 Procedure for Workers» Compensation Insurance 6223.60 R1 Professional Staff Evaluation 6192.00 Program Evaluation 0540.00 R1 Program Evaluation 0540.00 Prohibition of Referral or Assistance Property Claim Form 3934.00 E2 Property Inventory 3220.00 Property Inventory 3220.00 R1 Proposed Guidelines for the Provision of Sex Education 7122.40 Public Complaints or Concerns 9600.00 Public Complaints or Concerns 9600.00 R1 Public Complaints or Concerns - Guidelines 9600.00 E1 Public Information Program 9120.00 Public Information Program 9120.00 R1 Public Records 8310.00 R1 Public Records 9110.00 Public Records 9110.00 R1 Public School Academies (Charter Schools) 2020.00 Public School Academies - Review and Approval of Application 2020.00 R1 Purchasing 3810.00 R1 Purchasing 3810.00 Purchasing - Department Responsibilities 3810.00 E1 Purchasing Cards 3810.00 R14

For example, the brief describes how data — specifically, data that showed Highline Public Schools was making less progress than neighboring districts on closing equity gaps — ultimately created a sense of urgency that supported efforts by district leaders to change policy, practice and culture within the district.

In 2015, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a progressive think tank, found most states provide less financial support for public schools than they did before the Great Recession, and in some cases, much less.

Lawmakers are less likely to support school vouchers, despite much stronger support for vouchers among the American public.

Clinton would reduce the cost of college by providing states with grants to support two years of tuition - free community college and / or four years of tuition - free education at in - state public colleges and universities for students from families making less than $ 125,000 (phased in over 4 years starting at $ 85,000), building on her promise to ensure access to «debt - free» college.

Above all, however, Newsom emphasized the urgency of environmental justice for the less affluent, and appealed for support for public officials who are willing to take the lead in dealing with climate change.

Put another way, Congress could raise all of the funds needed to support long - term investments in this Energy Security Trust by increasing royalties paid for producing oil and gas from public lands and waters by an amount less than the typical daily fluctuations of oil and gas commodity prices.

One Planet Living principle Masdar Target ZERO CARBON 100 per cent of energy supplied by renewable energy — Photovoltaics, concentrated solar power, wind, waste to energy and other technologies ZERO WASTE 99 per cent diversion of waste from landfill (includes waste reduction measures, re-use of waste wherever possible, recycling, composting, waste to energy) SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT Zero carbon emissions from transport within the city; implementation of measures to reduce the carbon cost of journeys to the city boundaries (through facilitating and encouraging the use of public transport, vehicle sharing, supporting low emissions vehicle initiatives) SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS Specifying high recycled materials content within building products; tracking and encouraging the reduction of embodied energy within material sand throughout the construction process; specifying the use of sustainable materials such as Forest Stewardship Council certified timber, bamboo and other products SUSTAINABLE FOOD Retail outlets to meet targets for supplying organic food and sustainable and or fair trade products SUSTAINABLE WATER Per capita water consumption to be at least 50 per cent less than the national average; all waste water to be re-used HABITATS AND WILDLIFE All valuable species to be conserved or relocated with positive mitigation targets CULTURE AND HERITAGE Architecture to integrate local values.

The Australian public, who generally supports renewables and who likes to pay less for electricity, wouldn't have any of it.

If a «yes» vote meant that the system would be introduced for the next two, not more than three elections at the end of which there would be another vote to either confirm the new system or revert to the old FPTP, I think the public would be far less hesitant to support reform.

In other countries, e.g. the UK, there are less academic and public surveys from which to make a bulk combined assessment, but the situation seems similar despite the fact that all the main UK political parties support climate orthodox policies and have done so for a long time.

Boyce and Howard both call for a grassroots movement (the underpants gnome of all dividend arguments), but there is, to my knowledge, no evidence that dividend schemes would elicit much public support, much less a movement.

Did respondents in these places express less desire for carbon cuts because government doesn't seem as concerned as other places, or is government not doing anything because there's not enough public support?

According to a new report from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, «Economic Assessment of Biofuel Support Policies», not only is public support of biofuels costly it has little impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions: All the tax incentives, blending targets and other public support policies in the EU, US, and Canada total $ 25 billion per year, but will ultimately result in less than a 1 % reduction in emissions from transport bSupport Policies», not only is public support of biofuels costly it has little impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions: All the tax incentives, blending targets and other public support policies in the EU, US, and Canada total $ 25 billion per year, but will ultimately result in less than a 1 % reduction in emissions from transport bsupport of biofuels costly it has little impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions: All the tax incentives, blending targets and other public support policies in the EU, US, and Canada total $ 25 billion per year, but will ultimately result in less than a 1 % reduction in emissions from transport bsupport policies in the EU, US, and Canada total $ 25 billion per year, but will ultimately result in less than a 1 % reduction in emissions from transport by 2015.

As if the spread of misinformation about climate change to less - than - expert audiences does nothing to reverse public support for needed political solutions to global warming trends.

Now they are begging for bailouts from taxpayers, that would probably rather support more public transport and less pollution.

This undermines public support for the First Amendment and makes it easier both for police, legislators, and the courts to ignore or work around it when adhering to it would be less palatable.