digital dental radiographs which require much
less radiation exposure than conventional film
Digital images are acquired more rapidly, utilize no toxic chemicals, and create far
less radiation exposure compared with standard film.
This allows for
less radiation exposure to your pet and our employees.
There are many advantages to digital x-rays including a shorter time to take the x-ray, lack of chemicals needed to process an x-ray and
less radiation exposure to your pet and veterinarian.
Fewer retakes are required, resulting in
less radiation exposure for both the patient as well as the staff.
Our digital radiography produces clearer, faster results with
less radiation exposure than standard X-rays.
In hip dysplasia cases, orthopaedic surgeons work with musculoskeletal radiologists to reduce the number of slices from a CT scan of the hip, from a typical 5 to 10 slices to only one or two, which may provide enough helpful information to ensure a successful surgery with
less radiation exposure.
A single scan could diagnose the cause of foot pain better and with
less radiation exposure to the patient than other methods, according to a study in the March 2015 issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
Not exact matches
Again, we are told that
radiation from Sr - 90 has been
less than common
exposures from medical X-rays.
With
less atmospheric shielding, there is more
exposure to
radiation.
Far safer jobs exist, with better pay, more job security, more regular hours, and more opportunities... not to mention
less exposure to
radiation, nasty chemicals, biological pathogens, high voltages, and sharp, pointy things.
But that's still
less than the
radiation encountered in normal yearly
exposure to X-rays.
Robert Finkelman, a former USGS coordinator of coal quality who oversaw research on uranium in fly ash in the 1990s, says that for the average person the by - product accounts for a miniscule amount of background
radiation, probably
less than 0.1 percent of total background
radiation exposure.
(I was ready to order Demron underwear to protect the most vital of my vitals, but DeMeo explained to me that testicular cells stop actively dividing much earlier in life than breast cells, leaving the former much
less likely to become cancerous due to
radiation exposure.
Additionally, because partial breast
radiation is more targeted, there is
less exposure to vital organs like the lungs and the heart.
«
Less frequent screening would reduce
radiation exposure but previous studies of longer screening intervals produced varied results,» said lead author Dr Mi - Young Kim, a radiologist at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
If you're concerned about the
radiation, although it's far
less exposure than a nuclear stress test or heart catheterization, take an antioxidant vitamin pack 45 minutes before the CT to reduce the DNA risk by 50 %.
Radiation exposure to your pet is also reduced as we use far
less radiation for digital radiography.
Although cats continue to secrete the radioisotope for several weeks upon their return home, the resulting
radiation exposure to the owner is
less than the
radiation experienced by a passenger on a round - trip flight from New York to Los Angeles.
Digital X-rays also project
less radiation than traditional X-rays, which allows your pet to avoid unnecessary
exposure.
Less exposure to x-ray technology also means your pet is minimally exposed to any
radiation.
Digital radiography is a filmless x-ray system that produces immediate results, reduces
exposure to
radiation and requires
less table time for your pets versus the traditional film method.
This system is the most advanced digital x-ray system available offering the benefits of a lower dose
radiation exposure and
less repeat x-rays for quicker answers.
The additional
exposures received by most Japanese people in the first year and subsequent years due to the radioactive releases from the accident are
less than the doses received from natural background
radiation (which is about 2.1 mSv per year).
Note that the
radiation exposure from living within 50 miles of a coal fired plant is much, much
less than
exposure from living in a brick or stone house.
They will willfully fail to understand science's judgement that there is no safe level of
radiation exposure, the
less the better (And By God never reveal that nuke plants emit routinely release
radiation into the unsuspecting surrounding communities).
Ron R wrote: They will willfully fail to understand science's judgement that there is no safe level of
radiation exposure, the
less the better