So the only difference then between you and me is you are willing to accept a lower overall total cash flow for 30 years in return for getting more net cash flow than I do during the first 15 years, whereas once my properties are paid off in 15 years I will have considerably
less risk of losing them and will outpace your returns over the next 15 years.
1) You save time and aggravation by skipping the baggage check lines, 2) With many airlines charging for everything these days, you can potentially skip extra baggage fees, porter tips, and 3) There is
less risk of losing your bags.
Less risk of losing your pet.
The less risk of losing your money, the less someone is going to pay you to invest.
The Torsen - based quattro - equipped vehicle is able to execute a more stable high - speed turn under deceleration, with
less risk of losing control due to loss of grip in the front or rear axles.
Not exact matches
With Hunters, you need to pay them a higher portion
of their compensation in commission - perhaps as high as 100 %, but certainly no
less than 50/50
of salary and commission or you
risk losing their aggressiveness.
And the
risk of losing money also falls
less on Mylan than it does on those at the end
of the supply chain, with the pharmacy having to dispense EpiPens while accepting
less in copay money upfront, then applying for a rebate and waiting to see what trickles back.
And speaking
of inflation, shouldn't the
risk for CDs be scored
less than 10 because you may
lose money to inflation that may not be compensated for with the interest you receive?
Why leave money in equities, and
risk another year
of lost opportunity, when fixed income securities seem to be on the road to higher (and
less risky) returns?
Ozil / Sanchez have just 2 years left in their con tract and if we do not finish top 4 and both refuse to sign any contract extension this season then we run a
risk of losing them on free or for very
less.
There are some points i think he has not taken into consideration, he runs the
risk of losing his place in the England squad because he will get even
less game time at Liverpool, which will affect world cup dreams.
Women who were randomised to receive midwife - led care were
less likely to
lose their baby before 24 weeks» gestation, although there were no differences in the
risk of losing the baby after 24 weeks, or overall.
Women were
less likely to experience preterm birth, and they were also at a lower
risk of losing their babies.
Sure, there is the
risk of a possible trade war with the EU, China, the BRICS states, most
of the world effectively, but this is seen as a
lesser problem because mainly - exporting countries have more to
lose due to import barriers than mainly - importing countries.
«Many women not properly informed
of heart
risk by their doctors: Survey shows women are
less likely to get recommended monitoring, often told to
lose weight.»
Evidence emerged in the three studies that companies may face a greater
risk of losing female employees who experience female - instigated incivility, as they reported
less satisfaction at work and increased intentions to quit their current jobs in response to these unpleasant experiences.
Eating
less sugar can lower your
risk of diabetes, help you
lose weight, and even lead to brighter, younger - looking skin.
These types
of people tend to have an emotional and physical reaction when they do
lose money — making them
less likely to take
risks at all.
Eating
less fat will make you
lose weight, but it will also decrease the
risk of cardiovascular heart disease.
Ultimate strength and mass gains will surely not match those
of a high - weight regimen, but I would argue that for the vast majority
of people looking to
lose weight, build tone, and obtain some general fitness with
less risk of injury, that this is far preferable.
By eating whole unprocessed foods you will be able to eat enough food to feel full while eating
LESS calories and that way you will naturally
lose weight, feel better, have more energy, reduce your
risk of debilitating chronic diseases, become more regular (craplikeachamp), and live longer with life, vitality, and energy!
While they are
less likely to diet or take other measures to
lose weight than young women, those who do are at a greater
risk of negative health impacts, like bone and muscle loss, kidney failure, and even death.
Similarly, people who are leaner or just have
less weight to
lose are at a higher
risk of losing muscle.
Less risk of mixing, misplacing or
losing your baby's items.
Heineman admits he's no traditional war reporter, yet Cartel Land is unmistakable boots - on - the - ground film journalism, made at evident
risk of his life — with no
less than three running machine gun battles — to capture moments
of brutality and
lost morals.
Dweck found that praising students for intelligence actually made kids
less likely to take academic
risks because, on some level, they feared
losing the label
of «smart» if they did poorly.
The negative impact
of job market pessimism on engagement was more acute for students with stronger family and school supports — the same students whom we often assume are
less at
risk for
losing academic motivation.
Referencing Prime Minister Thera May's comments that those at state schools are
less likely to reach the top professions, the charity warns that without a focus on education in areas
of the country being left behind, thousands
of young people
risk losing out.
Whilst it is arguable that the matter could have been pursued for much
less, the reality is that litigation is a very costly exercise, with the
risk that the
losing party will be exposed to pay the legal costs
of the successful party.
And according to the federal No Child Left Behind law, states technically
risk losing some federal funding if
less than 95 percent
of students take the high - stakes exams.
My money management rules were as follows: (1) Never
risk more than half as much as the reasonable potential reward (e.g., don't
risk more than 10 pips if your reasonable take profit point is
less than 20 pips), and (2) never
risk on any one trade an amount that would draw down your total trading capital by more than 10 % (that's my «make sure you don't blow out your account» rule — I'm fairly confident
of my ability to avoid putting on 10
losing trades in a row, trading as I do as a scalper and short term swing trader).
The must face the
risk of losing the entire balance before agreeing to accept
less than full payment.
When people think to themselves «I'm only
risk 2 % per trade, that's not too much, and it will decrease my position size as I
lose», it literally makes them
less sensitive to the
risk in the market and to the threat
of account - destruction that results from over-trading.
While this can be
less risky for borrowers as they don't have to fear
of losing their assets due to defaulting, though the
risks can be heavy on the lenders.
There are times they will benefit
less or even
lose more when
risking a fixed dollar amount per trade due to lack
of position sizing.
I
risk 2 %
of my trading account on every trade so as my account goes up or down that determines how much is actually
risked per trade so as my account goes up more money per trade is
risked and when my account is going down
less money per trade is at
risk — simply put I would have to
lose 50 trades in a row for my account to be wiped out completely so its simple mathematics that though not impossible, its highly unlikely that I would
lose all my money before hitting a big trend and staying in the game.
A typical example would be: what is the maximum percentage I
risk losing over the next year with a 95 % confidence i.e. in 19 out
of 20 years I would expect to
lose less than this.
«There's
less risk associated with couples because if one
of you
loses your job, there's usually still an income stream coming into the home from the other partner,» says Heather Franklin, a CFP in Toronto.
There's psychological evidence that suggests it's human nature to become more
risk averse after a series
of losing trades and
less risk averse after a series
of winning trades, but that doesn't mean the
risk of any one trade becomes more or
less simply because you
lost or won on your previous trade.
These funds change the allocation over time, becoming more conservative (i.e.
less equity, more bonds) to reduce the
risk of an investor
losing a large percentage
of their net worth just before needing to start withdrawing money from the fund.
Some states offer plans that automatically shift the amount
of risk based on the child's age — meaning that as your child gets older, the 529 plan features
less risky investments, minimizing the
risk that you'll
lose it all right before you need to make a withdrawal.
So, obviously you want to put it in something that is not so volatile, liquid, has
less risk of loss, preserves capital and does not
lose out to inflation too much.
You can
lose the amount
of the loan (your investment) if the company or governmental body fails, but the
risk of loss to creditors (bondholders) is generally
less than the
risk for owners (shareholders).
Why leave money in equities, and
risk another year
of lost opportunity, when fixed income securities seem to be on the road to higher (and
less risky) returns?
HELOCs are fairly easy to get which means borrowers with
less than stellar impulse control run the
risk of losing their home if they end up with larger debts than they can pay off
It doesn't mean you'll win, but the
risk of losing is
less.
Paying off a mortgage means you'll be
less at
risk of losing your home through foreclosure if you
lose your job or have a reduction in income.
As the so called «baby boomers» begin to retire they will begin to switch to bond mutual bonds that provide current income with
less risk compared to equities in order to avoid
losing a substantial portion
of their life savings.
Alternatively, if you're retiring and intend to withdraw all your super in
less than 5 years, you may want to know exactly how much you'll have - and not
risk losing any
of it in the meantime.
At some point after 10 - 15
of investing in stocks only, I do plan to transfer a percentage
of the portfolio to
less risky assets
of fixed income to reduce the
risk of losing money due to stock market fluctuations when approaching her start date.