Sentences with phrase «less risk of losing»

So the only difference then between you and me is you are willing to accept a lower overall total cash flow for 30 years in return for getting more net cash flow than I do during the first 15 years, whereas once my properties are paid off in 15 years I will have considerably less risk of losing them and will outpace your returns over the next 15 years.
1) You save time and aggravation by skipping the baggage check lines, 2) With many airlines charging for everything these days, you can potentially skip extra baggage fees, porter tips, and 3) There is less risk of losing your bags.
The less risk of losing your money, the less someone is going to pay you to invest.
The Torsen - based quattro - equipped vehicle is able to execute a more stable high - speed turn under deceleration, with less risk of losing control due to loss of grip in the front or rear axles.

Not exact matches

With Hunters, you need to pay them a higher portion of their compensation in commission - perhaps as high as 100 %, but certainly no less than 50/50 of salary and commission or you risk losing their aggressiveness.
And the risk of losing money also falls less on Mylan than it does on those at the end of the supply chain, with the pharmacy having to dispense EpiPens while accepting less in copay money upfront, then applying for a rebate and waiting to see what trickles back.
And speaking of inflation, shouldn't the risk for CDs be scored less than 10 because you may lose money to inflation that may not be compensated for with the interest you receive?
Why leave money in equities, and risk another year of lost opportunity, when fixed income securities seem to be on the road to higher (and less risky) returns?
Ozil / Sanchez have just 2 years left in their con tract and if we do not finish top 4 and both refuse to sign any contract extension this season then we run a risk of losing them on free or for very less.
There are some points i think he has not taken into consideration, he runs the risk of losing his place in the England squad because he will get even less game time at Liverpool, which will affect world cup dreams.
Women who were randomised to receive midwife - led care were less likely to lose their baby before 24 weeks» gestation, although there were no differences in the risk of losing the baby after 24 weeks, or overall.
Women were less likely to experience preterm birth, and they were also at a lower risk of losing their babies.
Sure, there is the risk of a possible trade war with the EU, China, the BRICS states, most of the world effectively, but this is seen as a lesser problem because mainly - exporting countries have more to lose due to import barriers than mainly - importing countries.
«Many women not properly informed of heart risk by their doctors: Survey shows women are less likely to get recommended monitoring, often told to lose weight.»
Evidence emerged in the three studies that companies may face a greater risk of losing female employees who experience female - instigated incivility, as they reported less satisfaction at work and increased intentions to quit their current jobs in response to these unpleasant experiences.
Eating less sugar can lower your risk of diabetes, help you lose weight, and even lead to brighter, younger - looking skin.
These types of people tend to have an emotional and physical reaction when they do lose money — making them less likely to take risks at all.
Eating less fat will make you lose weight, but it will also decrease the risk of cardiovascular heart disease.
Ultimate strength and mass gains will surely not match those of a high - weight regimen, but I would argue that for the vast majority of people looking to lose weight, build tone, and obtain some general fitness with less risk of injury, that this is far preferable.
By eating whole unprocessed foods you will be able to eat enough food to feel full while eating LESS calories and that way you will naturally lose weight, feel better, have more energy, reduce your risk of debilitating chronic diseases, become more regular (craplikeachamp), and live longer with life, vitality, and energy!
While they are less likely to diet or take other measures to lose weight than young women, those who do are at a greater risk of negative health impacts, like bone and muscle loss, kidney failure, and even death.
Similarly, people who are leaner or just have less weight to lose are at a higher risk of losing muscle.
Less risk of mixing, misplacing or losing your baby's items.
Heineman admits he's no traditional war reporter, yet Cartel Land is unmistakable boots - on - the - ground film journalism, made at evident risk of his life — with no less than three running machine gun battles — to capture moments of brutality and lost morals.
Dweck found that praising students for intelligence actually made kids less likely to take academic risks because, on some level, they feared losing the label of «smart» if they did poorly.
The negative impact of job market pessimism on engagement was more acute for students with stronger family and school supports — the same students whom we often assume are less at risk for losing academic motivation.
Referencing Prime Minister Thera May's comments that those at state schools are less likely to reach the top professions, the charity warns that without a focus on education in areas of the country being left behind, thousands of young people risk losing out.
Whilst it is arguable that the matter could have been pursued for much less, the reality is that litigation is a very costly exercise, with the risk that the losing party will be exposed to pay the legal costs of the successful party.
And according to the federal No Child Left Behind law, states technically risk losing some federal funding if less than 95 percent of students take the high - stakes exams.
My money management rules were as follows: (1) Never risk more than half as much as the reasonable potential reward (e.g., don't risk more than 10 pips if your reasonable take profit point is less than 20 pips), and (2) never risk on any one trade an amount that would draw down your total trading capital by more than 10 % (that's my «make sure you don't blow out your account» rule — I'm fairly confident of my ability to avoid putting on 10 losing trades in a row, trading as I do as a scalper and short term swing trader).
The must face the risk of losing the entire balance before agreeing to accept less than full payment.
When people think to themselves «I'm only risk 2 % per trade, that's not too much, and it will decrease my position size as I lose», it literally makes them less sensitive to the risk in the market and to the threat of account - destruction that results from over-trading.
While this can be less risky for borrowers as they don't have to fear of losing their assets due to defaulting, though the risks can be heavy on the lenders.
There are times they will benefit less or even lose more when risking a fixed dollar amount per trade due to lack of position sizing.
I risk 2 % of my trading account on every trade so as my account goes up or down that determines how much is actually risked per trade so as my account goes up more money per trade is risked and when my account is going down less money per trade is at risk — simply put I would have to lose 50 trades in a row for my account to be wiped out completely so its simple mathematics that though not impossible, its highly unlikely that I would lose all my money before hitting a big trend and staying in the game.
A typical example would be: what is the maximum percentage I risk losing over the next year with a 95 % confidence i.e. in 19 out of 20 years I would expect to lose less than this.
«There's less risk associated with couples because if one of you loses your job, there's usually still an income stream coming into the home from the other partner,» says Heather Franklin, a CFP in Toronto.
There's psychological evidence that suggests it's human nature to become more risk averse after a series of losing trades and less risk averse after a series of winning trades, but that doesn't mean the risk of any one trade becomes more or less simply because you lost or won on your previous trade.
These funds change the allocation over time, becoming more conservative (i.e. less equity, more bonds) to reduce the risk of an investor losing a large percentage of their net worth just before needing to start withdrawing money from the fund.
Some states offer plans that automatically shift the amount of risk based on the child's age — meaning that as your child gets older, the 529 plan features less risky investments, minimizing the risk that you'll lose it all right before you need to make a withdrawal.
So, obviously you want to put it in something that is not so volatile, liquid, has less risk of loss, preserves capital and does not lose out to inflation too much.
You can lose the amount of the loan (your investment) if the company or governmental body fails, but the risk of loss to creditors (bondholders) is generally less than the risk for owners (shareholders).
Why leave money in equities, and risk another year of lost opportunity, when fixed income securities seem to be on the road to higher (and less risky) returns?
HELOCs are fairly easy to get which means borrowers with less than stellar impulse control run the risk of losing their home if they end up with larger debts than they can pay off
It doesn't mean you'll win, but the risk of losing is less.
Paying off a mortgage means you'll be less at risk of losing your home through foreclosure if you lose your job or have a reduction in income.
As the so called «baby boomers» begin to retire they will begin to switch to bond mutual bonds that provide current income with less risk compared to equities in order to avoid losing a substantial portion of their life savings.
Alternatively, if you're retiring and intend to withdraw all your super in less than 5 years, you may want to know exactly how much you'll have - and not risk losing any of it in the meantime.
At some point after 10 - 15 of investing in stocks only, I do plan to transfer a percentage of the portfolio to less risky assets of fixed income to reduce the risk of losing money due to stock market fluctuations when approaching her start date.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z