Sentences with phrase «less risk of losing your money»

The less risk of losing your money, the less someone is going to pay you to invest.

Not exact matches

And the risk of losing money also falls less on Mylan than it does on those at the end of the supply chain, with the pharmacy having to dispense EpiPens while accepting less in copay money upfront, then applying for a rebate and waiting to see what trickles back.

And speaking of inflation, shouldn't the risk for CDs be scored less than 10 because you may lose money to inflation that may not be compensated for with the interest you receive?

Why leave money in equities, and risk another year of lost opportunity, when fixed income securities seem to be on the road to higher (and less risky) returns?

These types of people tend to have an emotional and physical reaction when they do lose money — making them less likely to take risks at all.

My money management rules were as follows: (1) Never risk more than half as much as the reasonable potential reward (e.g., don't risk more than 10 pips if your reasonable take profit point is less than 20 pips), and (2) never risk on any one trade an amount that would draw down your total trading capital by more than 10 % (that's my «make sure you don't blow out your account» rule — I'm fairly confident of my ability to avoid putting on 10 losing trades in a row, trading as I do as a scalper and short term swing trader).

I risk 2 % of my trading account on every trade so as my account goes up or down that determines how much is actually risked per trade so as my account goes up more money per trade is risked and when my account is going down less money per trade is at risk — simply put I would have to lose 50 trades in a row for my account to be wiped out completely so its simple mathematics that though not impossible, its highly unlikely that I would lose all my money before hitting a big trend and staying in the game.

These funds change the allocation over time, becoming more conservative (i.e. less equity, more bonds) to reduce the risk of an investor losing a large percentage of their net worth just before needing to start withdrawing money from the fund.

Why leave money in equities, and risk another year of lost opportunity, when fixed income securities seem to be on the road to higher (and less risky) returns?

At some point after 10 - 15 of investing in stocks only, I do plan to transfer a percentage of the portfolio to less risky assets of fixed income to reduce the risk of losing money due to stock market fluctuations when approaching her start date.