In particular, its 1920 x 1200 resolution results in
a less sharp picture - 224ppi vs the 264ppi of Samsung's and Apple's finest.
Not exact matches
It's
less noticeable when the video is playing at normal speed, but it's still there and makes the overall
picture look
less sharp than progressive scanning.
The
picture is as
sharp, vibrant, spotless and picturesque as it should be, leaving nothing to be desired, except perhaps
less reliance on CGI.
MGM delivers
less in its DVD release of That Championship Season, offering the
picture in a non-anamorphic 1.85:1 widescreen rendition that, although surprisingly
sharp, is riddled with edge enhancement and, in the night shots, a good deal of grain.
Displaying few signs of its age, the
picture remains
sharp, clean, and reasonably vibrant throughout, never for a moment leaving you any
less than satisfied.
The 2.40:1
picture is inexplicably a smidge
less sharp and detailed than you'd like (maybe because it's compressed to fit on a single - layered disc), but as clean and vibrant as modern cinema should be in 1080p.
So whether you have a competitive edge you want to keep
sharp, or you're already taking
pictures of strangers» dogs anyway so you figure putting them online with other strangers is
less weird than just keeping them on your phone where they aren't doing anyone any good (and certainly aren't winning you any playoffs!)
In fact, you might argue that the G5 Plus»
picture is slightly better, because even though the G5 Plus shot looks a bit yellow again, it's slightly
sharper and a tiny bit
less grainy.
These
pictures are good enough for Facebook or Instagram, but if you look more closely, you'll find some distortion around edges that makes the subject look
less sharp.
Ultra HD TVs are getting more affordable, giving you a very
sharp picture for
less money.