Sentences with phrase «less than scientific»

As far as I have been able to understand the debate on «temperatures», we are using the wrong (or a less than scientific) metric.

Would it be out of order to expect that should that communication indicate there were time «pressures» and / or other «less than scientific reasons» for a rush to publication that the reputations of the scientists and certainly NOAA won't be tarnished.

Some of these statements are less than scientific, even if we may agree with them personally.

Christianity, no less than our scientific culture, is still tied to dualism.

Here's a recent missive from no less than Scientific American (Oct 16 2006 edition).

Not exact matches

Again, it's not a scientific measure, but I've heard much less about the NBC brouhaha over on my Facebook account than I have on Twitter.

In an industry characterized by large retainer fees and less - than - scientific outcome measurement and subjectivity, be careful and cautious: Here are five things to look for when assessing which PR agency to hire:

(That said, no less an authority than Scientific American is concerned that Trump will be anti-science.)

Science, meet your makers: The two were invited to demonstrate their product at an oceanographic conference, where the crowd, accustomed to pricey scientific equipment, thought the less - than - $ 1,000 OpenROV «was so cheap,» Stackpole says.

From the Wellcome Trust Monitor survey, we know that less than 10 % think horoscopes are «very» or «quite» scientific.

We are informed at the beginning that the signal was never decoded, and so the novel is less a story of scientific triumph than a series of ruminations on hermeneutics, the hubris of scientists, and the sociology of academic cohorts.

Your answer is much less reasonable than any scientific answer that has been given so far.

He is not less concerned than the materialist or the scientific humanist for the welfare of men, but more so; for he has glimpsed something of man's value and potentiality in the eyes of God.

If that illumination empowers believers to find signs of design in creation, who can affirm that their insight is less scientific than the neo-Darwinian hypotheses?

You should let them know that their application of the scientific method to the interpretation of evidence is no more or less credible than solving crimes with psychic powers.

Bill, please present evidence that children raised by Bible believing Christians are less «scientific» than other children?

Because the improbability of the scientific explanation for the universe is multiple orders of magnitude less than the improbability of some god being responsible.

It's fairly easy to see that there is no form of thinking less compatible with blind faith than scientific reasoning.

Lesser men than the great scientists too readily assumed that all new knowledge must be made to fit the «scientific» dogma, just as earlier it was expected to fit the ecclesiastical dogma.

Mr. Futterman's reference to quantum computers solving problems by a «leap of intuition» is therefore less a matter of sober scientific assessment than rhapsodic misdirection by a scientist who should know better.

I advise my scientific colleagues and students to become more political rather than less so, because it is impossible to separate science from politics when government funding is a primary factor for promotion and tenure in academia.

This new preoccupation with transcendence is prompted less by a scientific outlook than by human satiety with the world as it is.

The attitudes listed above operate less as personal motives than as presuppositions of the whole scientific enterprise and conditions of work embodied in its institutions and traditions.

Imaginations made up by a less (scientific) time than our current time are running short on believability.

It seems to them, no less than to scientific thinkers, to be magical and superstitious.

Montgomery brings us to Percy's eventual realization that ordinary experience can reveal profound truths» can actually be holy» no less than some more spectacular epiphany, despite modern man's rejection of all but scientific meaning in natural events.

The basic assumptions of the tradition are acquired less from formal principles than from familiarity with its historical exemplars; commitment to a scientific paradigm allows its potentialities to be systematically explored.

The Universe, known and unknown, is possibly not the most used definition of God, at least in the western world... but it is the Pantheistic version that jives so much more with science and is not a misappropriation of the smaller definitions of God, merely an unfamiliar definition to those with less knowledge of various more advanced religious and philosophic thought, within and outside those religions... The idea of Pantheism also thoughtfully considers why there is, rather than ridiculing, such a wide range of philosophical and ritual beliefs from a scientific perspective... without having to classify large groups of people, as senseless idiots from one end or destined for hell from the other.

«We must face up to a world that has been made into one interdependent community, less by political or ideological ideas than by scientific and technological facts.»

Scientific studies have even shown it to be LESS harmful to the human body than both cigarettes and alcohol and those are items you can pick up at the store along with a gallon of milk.

27 Mar 2018 — A chocolate bar that contains 30 percent less sugar than usual is making its debut in the UK and Ireland as Nestlé unveils an innovative sugar reduction technique that is being hailed as a scientific breakthrough because of the way it «restructures» sugar.

My chronicle of the four days of house arrest that followed belongs less in SI than in The New England Journal of Medicine, as I voluntarily developed — in the interest of scientific inquiry — the first clinical case of March Madness.

Rumbelow explores the genesis of the World Health Organization «optimum» C - section rate of less than 15 % and finds that there is no scientific evidence to support it.

If you read the scientific and medical literature, the controversy about bed sharing safety primarily concerns babies less than 20 weeks old, and the most recent meta - analysis of published studies found no evidence of increased risk for babies over 3 months of age (Carpenter et al 2013).

Scientific studies have shown us that breastfed children have far fewer and less serious illnesses than those who never receive breast milk, including a reduced risk of SIDS, childhood cancers, and diabetes (1, 2, 3).

Two of the journals cited in the GFI article are considered in the professional community to be less scientific and less subject to peer review than the leading journals.

The authors reported that researchers and quality improvement executives tracking outcomes for very low birthweight infants (those born weighing less than 1,500 grams) have increasingly used the general term «human milk feeding» to refer to both MOM and DHM, seemingly ignoring the fundamental, scientific differences between the two.

I've read (and written) articles in peer reviewed scientific journals with less sophisticated analysis than this.

More recently, in the 20th century, Russia's USSR was competing with the USA to be the leading nation in no less than the military, economical, scientific and cultural domains: it produced the second major economical philosophy (communism) and was the first nation to have a man in space!

Religious people are less intelligent than non-believers, according to a scientific review of a decades - long study.

Equally strikingly, the new contributors are «less likely to be part of the scientific elite» than the star was, though they are «not necessarily younger on average» than the star.

Although he is, in most respects, a traditional winemaker, he says his scientific background allows him to maintain control over some of the more technical aspects of the winemaking process — more control than winemakers less versed in the science of fermentation.

Manchester's breadth of scientific prowess is unfortunately far less renowned than its soccer teams and music scene, laments Rothwell.

CHICAGO — One of the largest surveys of American views on religion and science suggests that the religious and scientific communities may be less combative than is commonly portrayed in the media and in politics.

Polls such as the 2009 U.S. Religious and Landscape Survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center's Forum on Religion & Public Life, have suggested that less than half of all Americans accept the scientific theory of evolution.

Less than one percent of the world's water is liquid fresh water, and scientific studies suggest that a majority of U.S. and global fresh water is now at risk because of increasing consumption, evaporation and pollution.

COPENHAGEN — Surely, one reason women scientists are relatively rare on university faculties — in academic leadership posts such as department chairs and deans, on the programs of scientific meetings, as experts interviewed by the media, on boards, and in other prominent positions — is that women are less visible than men.

Reading and considering such testimony would undoubtedly take more time and effort and could feel less «scientific» than looking at numbers, whether test scores, GPAs, or tallies of publications.

A new study out today in Psychology of Women Quarterly examined a well - known space for candid sharing of thoughts — the comments sections of online articles — and found that men are much less likely to agree with scientific evidence of gender bias in STEM than women.

Modern diesel cars emit less pollution generally than cars that run on gasoline, says a new six - nation study published today in Scientific Reports whose groundwork was laid in part by an American chemist now working at Université de Montréal.