Sentences with phrase «less transaction costs»

Tha way I would buy low implied and sell high implied volatility, I would capture the same skew effect but with less transaction costs.

So out of his original $ A3, 500 he was left with about $ A675, less any transaction costs.

Adjusted Revenue is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as our total net revenue less transaction costs, adjusted to eliminate the effect of activity under our payment processing agreement with Starbucks.

Open trade - a part of all multilateral meetings saw the usual narrative of commitment to more trade with lesser transaction costs.

The remaining 60 investors can not earn more than 10 % collectively, and they too will earn 10 % less their transactions costs which will be higher.

The net result of all futures contracts must be zero, less transactions costs.

Not exact matches

Free Cash Flow - Net cash provided by operating activities less cash purchases of property and equipment, including proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions and less cash payments for debt prepayment of debt extinguishment costs.

The average Bitcoin transaction costs much less.

In addition, the company has built its technology for transaction processing in such a way that it costs 75 % less than traditional banks» core deposit platform, Mr. Britt said.

Higher transaction costs Due to a typically large spread between bid and offer prices, and higher transaction costs associated with less liquid securities, trading high yield bonds can be costly.

That has is being used and one of the reasons why the transaction costs come down is because there has been less transactions recently.

Accepting Bitcoin does increase overall revenue and results in less fees for transactions, but many companies do not expect that the profits from accepting Bitcoin will exceed the costs of implementing it in the first place and, therefore, choose to spend the money somewhere else.

«Despite an estimated $ 3 trillion of art assets in the world, only $ 44 billion trades in a given year — and less than 2 percent of qualified buyers participate in this market due to high transaction costs, long lead times, and limited transparency on pricing and value,» Artsy will bring this last major consumer category online and thereby substantially expand the size of the global art market.

In summary, evidence indicates that investors learn to trade less as they gain experience, perhaps due to the immediate feedback associated with transaction costs, but they do not learn to diversify or avoid the disposition effect.

Beyond this compelling offer is the fact that transaction costs come down dramatically as well because TLN consumes far less energy.

One additional issue to note is the fact that the latest Bitcoin price rally has made the low - transaction - cost feature of this cryptocurrency less attractive.

10.c by 2030, reduce to less than 3 % the transaction costs of migrant remittances and eliminate remittance corridors with costs higher than 5 %

That's just a bit beyond the average transaction cost for a new - vehicle purchase and thousands less than for the «low - cost» European sport convertibles from Audi or BMW.

Consider: For $ 28,600 — thousands less than the average transaction cost of a new vehicle — you can find a 2014 Pilot EX-L that furnishes leather - trimmed seating, a 10 - way power adjustable driver's chair, a heated front row, a leather - wrapped steering wheel, Bluetooth connectivity, and a seven - speaker sound system with a subwoofer.

This is only to be expected, of course, since that price point is thousands of dollars less than the transaction cost of an average new vehicle today.

«If the columns are a couple Google searches away, I don't know what you'd pay somebody to do that, but it's probably less than what it costs me in a transaction fee to sell an ebook.

Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, possible disruptions in Barnes & Noble's computer systems, telephone systems or supply chain, possible risks associated with data privacy, information security and intellectual property, possible work stoppages or increases in labor costs, possible increases in shipping rates or interruptions in shipping service, effects of competition, possible risks that inventory in channels of distribution may be larger than able to be sold, possible risks associated with changes in the strategic direction of the device business, including possible reduction in sales of content, accessories and other merchandise and other adverse financial impacts, possible risk that component parts will be rendered obsolete or otherwise not be able to be effectively utilized in devices to be sold, possible risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, possible risk that returns from consumers or channels of distribution may be greater than estimated, the risk that digital sales growth is less than expectations and the risk that it does not exceed the rate of investment spend, higher - than - anticipated store closing or relocation costs, higher interest rates, the performance of Barnes & Noble's online, digital and other initiatives, the success of Barnes & Noble's strategic investments, unanticipated increases in merchandise, component or occupancy costs, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, product and component shortages, the potential adverse impact on the Company's businesses resulting from the Company's prior reviews of strategic alternatives and the potential separation of the Company's businesses, the risk that the transactions with Microsoft and Pearson do not achieve the expected benefits for the parties or impose costs on the Company in excess of what the Company anticipates, including the risk that NOOK Media's applications are not commercially successful or that the expected distribution of those applications is not achieved, risks associated with the international expansion contemplated by the relationship with Microsoft, including that it is not successful or is delayed, the risk that NOOK Media is not able to perform its obligations under the Microsoft and Pearson commercial agreements and the consequences thereof, risks associated with the restatement contained in, the delayed filing of, and the material weakness in internal controls described in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, risks associated with the SEC investigation disclosed in the quarterly report on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 26, 2013, risks associated with the ongoing efforts to rationalize the NOOK business and the expected costs and benefits of such efforts and associated risks and other factors which may be outside of Barnes & Noble's control, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,» in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, and in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.

Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the effect of the proposed separation of NOOK Media, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, possible disruptions in Barnes & Noble's computer systems, telephone systems or supply chain, possible risks associated with data privacy, information security and intellectual property, possible work stoppages or increases in labor costs, possible increases in shipping rates or interruptions in shipping service, effects of competition, possible risks that inventory in channels of distribution may be larger than able to be sold, possible risks associated with changes in the strategic direction of the device business, including possible reduction in sales of content, accessories and other merchandise and other adverse financial impacts, possible risk that component parts will be rendered obsolete or otherwise not be able to be effectively utilized in devices to be sold, possible risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, possible risk that returns from consumers or channels of distribution may be greater than estimated, the risk that digital sales growth is less than expectations and the risk that it does not exceed the rate of investment spend, higher - than - anticipated store closing or relocation costs, higher interest rates, the performance of Barnes & Noble's online, digital and other initiatives, the success of Barnes & Noble's strategic investments, unanticipated increases in merchandise, component or occupancy costs, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, product and component shortages, risks associated with the commercial agreement with Samsung, the potential adverse impact on the Company's businesses resulting from the Company's prior reviews of strategic alternatives and the potential separation of the Company's businesses (including with respect to the timing of the completion thereof), the risk that the transactions with Pearson and Samsung do not achieve the expected benefits for the parties or impose costs on the Company in excess of what the Company anticipates, including the risk that NOOK Media's applications are not commercially successful or that the expected distribution of those applications is not achieved, risks associated with the international expansion previously undertaken, including any risks associated with a reduction of international operations following termination of the Microsoft commercial agreement, the risk that NOOK Media is not able to perform its obligations under the Pearson and Samsung commercial agreements and the consequences thereof, the risks associated with the termination of Microsoft commercial agreement, including potential customer losses, risks associated with the restatement contained in, the delayed filing of, and the material weakness in internal controls described in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, risks associated with the SEC investigation disclosed in the quarterly report on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 26, 2013, risks associated with the ongoing efforts to rationalize the NOOK business and the expected costs and benefits of such efforts and associated risks and other factors which may be outside of Barnes & Noble's control, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,» in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2014, and in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.

Now making transaction costs less than 1 % of a trade (which is my goal) is going to be much easier.

** For 203 (k) purchase transactions the maximum loan amount is the lesser of the sales price + renovation costs or 110 % of the after improved value, times the maximum loan - to - value.

If you have been wise enough and lucky enough to retain a good credit history, these loans can be convenient, helpful, and cost far less than a similar credit card transaction.

You may have to write slightly less DITM, or even at - the - money in order to have the time premium earned cover the transaction costs and still leave a profit that meets your goal.

Investing in local markets give you better understanding of such changes and the risk associated is less plus the Ease of carrying out transactions is great, less expensive compared to cost of transactions in other markets.

(2) Typically you pay transaction costs of $ 10 or less per trade on a discount brokerage account, which is negligible as a percent of assets if you have a moderate sized account and trade infrequently.

Fewer funds means less rebalancing and lower transactions costs, especially with US - listed ETFs.

As a commodity speculator, you could leverage the equivalent value of our country's 500 largest stocks with one futures contract, using approximately 90 % less money, and with far less in transaction costs.

While this is advertised as a modern bank or credit union which provides nothing but the best for its customers, in reality it keeps costs significantly reduce by requiring less workers to handle the same amount of transactions or inquiries.

They are also subject to transaction costs, but ETFs are rarely actively managed so trade much less often.

Re-balancing could take place once a year which with a discount broker should cost less than $ 100 p.a.. Another way to keep re-balancing costs low is to direct new investments only to underweight portions of the portfolio, thus delaying capital gains and sell - side transaction costs.

Then consider the transaction costs and the bid - ask spreads of less liquid stocks.

These considerations include changes in exchange rates and exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, foreign government restrictions, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, greater risks associated with counterparties and settlement, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility.

Investing requires much less work than short - term trading, cost less, creates fewer transactions and saves more in taxes.

Thus ETFs will have less impact of such transactions cost as compared to Index Funds.

Investing in emerging markets may involve greater risks than investing in developed countries, including the possibility of industry concentration, nationalization, taxes and transaction costs, lower trading volumes, and less liquid securities, resulting in higher volatility.

«If you have a short - term time horizon — say, less than a few years — you're going to be better off renting because in all probability... you won't recoup transaction costs.»

If you plan on making 10 or more purchases a month, the $ 9.95 monthly fee could end up costing you less than the per - transaction fee of the AccountNow Prepaid Visa Card.

What I can say from a strategic perspective is that 1) I like a purchase of assets at historically low prices, 2) MFC has some expertise in the commodity business so this isn't completely outside their playing field, 3) perhaps, worst case, there could be a strategy to purchase the assets in bulk at a distress sale and then sell them off piecemeal for a profit, and 4) while this may be a role of the dice (who knows where gas prices will be a year from now) MFC is not betting the ranch; the total investment will be about CDN $ 75 million ($ 33 for the outstanding shares, $ 8 million for the warrants, $ 30 million additional investment and I've estimated $ 4 million for transaction costs), or less than 25 % of MFC's current cash hoard.

If transferring an existing retirement plan into an IRA, you should be aware that (i) Those assets will no longer be subject to the protections of ERISA (if applicable)(ii) depending on the investments and services selected for the IRA, you may pay more or less in transaction costs than when the assets are in the Plan, (iii) if you are between the age of 55 and 59 1/2, you would lose the ability to potentially take penalty - free withdrawals from the plan, (iv) if you continue working past age 70 1/2 and transferred your plan assets to a new employer's plan, you would not be subject to required minimum distribution and (v) withdrawing assets directly would be subject to federal and applicable state and local taxes and possibly be subject to the IRS penalty of 10 % if under age 59 1/2.

The only concern would be (possibly) higher equity transactions costs and certainly larger fixed - income buy - sell spreads, due to smaller and less liquid markets other than Germany.

Investment securities should be valued at market prices, less estimated transaction costs in selling them.

Although I'm assuming you can buy and sell for $ 9.99 or less, with regular contributions and rebalancing, your transaction costs could easily amount to hundreds or even thousands of dollars per year.

The trick is to find a transaction account that costs you less in fees and suits your everyday spending habits.

Although I'll never buy at the bottom or maximally profit from a one - day dip, my transaction costs are minimal (less than 10 basis points during 2017).

In summary, evidence indicates that investors learn to trade less as they gain experience, perhaps due to the immediate feedback associated with transaction costs, but they do not learn to diversify or avoid the disposition effect.

The fee covers about one - fifth or less of the cost to us and we always meet the «buyer» before we complete that transaction.