The reason they need more attention is another, more ominous and
less understood atmospheric mystery.
Not exact matches
Increased
understanding of uncertainties in radiosonde and satellite records makes assessment of causes of observed trends in the upper troposphere
less confident than an assessment of overall
atmospheric temperature changes.
Do you think he didn't
understand atmospheric physics when he wrote «it is found that even an increase by a factor of 8 in the amount of CO2, which is highly unlikely in the next several thousand years, will produce an increase in the surface temperature of
less than 2 deg.
I take your point about the increase in
atmospheric CO2 being
less than what we emit, but unless we know the totals emiited and absorbed it is hard to
understand the errors and sensitivities involved.