Sentences with phrase «less value getting»

We need to see and support more shows like this because there are too many shows of significantly less value getting more attention.
«My interpretation is it's really sort of success in the early years, but less value gets added as students grow older,» Andreas Schleicher, who administers the PISA exam for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, told The Huffington Post.

Not exact matches

If you get the strategy and the values of the business right, the execution, while no less challenging, is at least a little easier to pull off.
The website's team approximates the value of each point at $ 0.019, though it's possible to get a lesser or much greater value depending on how you use them.
I always read the deck before the meeting but if I get it 12 hours in advance I certainly don't have time to do analysis, formulate views, check on facts and so forth and therefore I'm less prepared to add value when I arrive.
The recipient will get an email with the gift details and can choose details such as size and color before shipping — or pick a different gift of equal or lesser value.
That low - key, always - on, super-skilled guy on your team probably adds more value than anyone but gets far less praise and attention than more volatile or less reliable performers.
If you choose instead to take the entire cash prize at one time, you get much less money up front: The cash payout value at the time of writing is $ 411.7 million.
Though it's still more than $ 10,000 less than the vehicle's estimated value, which Charitybuzz places at $ 82,000, bidders still have another nine days to get there.
I don't know what challenges you face, but if your challenge is less than a marathon and you're physically more able than a 66 - year - old grandmother, you can probably get that value too.
The Platinum Card is more or less the flagship premium travel card, offering rewards, perks, and benefits that can net a ton of value for travelers — for instance, I got more than $ 2,000 from the card my first year with it.
They also value getting through the line quickly in so - called fast - casual restaurants (upscale fast - food chains without table service, such as Chipotle)(81 percent versus 71 percent) and care relatively less about «friendly» service.
However, the creditors still get the short end of the financial stick: the face value of the common stock to be received will almost certainly be less than the face value of the original debt.
The taxpayer got the benefit of the appreciated value of 25K for each piece of «art», which was probably BS and paid a lot less in taxes.
But potential tax implications get trickier with bonds purchased in the secondary market at a premium or discount — in other words, investors that paid more or less than the face value of the bond.
So for me the easiest, quickest way of getting some value or currency in her hand in 10 minutes or less would be to move bitcoins.»
The idea is that you need to have less risk of a large drop in value as you get close to retiring.
If you build links continuously on the same external site, you'll get far less value than you'll get by building links on other external sites.
Because inventory depreciates in value, it is less liquid (less likely to be turned into cash at full value), than accounts receivable, so you will not be able to get full value on your financing.
This will cause the value of your points to fluctuate, depending on the redemption you're getting — we urge readers to make sure they are not walking away with a value of less than $ 0.02 per mile, otherwise they'll be devaluing their points significantly.
«One of the biggest dangers in value investing is falling for the formerly high - quality business that is getting slightly less high quality every day.
And by thinking about future earnings you're also less likely to overpay for a stock or get caught in a value trap.
When I try to look for value investments, I am willing to accept less on the value side if I get more on the growth side.
The type of mortgage you get also plays a factor, with some lenders limiting how much they'll want to lend to 80 % or less of the home's value, while other special programs allow you to borrow between 95 % and 100 % of the value of the home if you qualify.
For example, getting it at 10 % below fair value would require a price of $ 64 / share, or about $ 3 less than its current price.
You may get it for less than market value, and you will get a home warranty incentive.
In the event of a default the property is sold and the bank gets all its money back because they are in a full equity position, the amount lent is less than the total value of the asset so they are only out the time it takes to get the property sold.
The value of shares, ETFs and ETCs bought through a stockbroking account can fall as well as rise, which could mean getting back less than you originally put in.
Funds have put less emphasis on active portfolio management largely because minority stakes make it difficult to get directly involved in management and value creation.
Buying stocks on a value basis means you're already getting them on sale, so they have less room to fall.
I tend to think we should have less religion imposed on us from the masses, thus recruiting from the major religions is required, otherwise we get into problems and wars which are heavily faith - based and have little or no humanistic value.
Though many of the people I know are deeply engaged in a spiritual quest of one kind or another, it's getting less and less fashionable for Americans to frame their lives around their values and beliefs.
But the increasing value put on having a successful career isn't the only reason why we're getting married later and less often.
Well, he's a lot less concerned about the nutritional value of what he's shoving into his face and more concerned with the fact that he just gets something — anything — into his body within a couple hours of waking.
In just six months, I broke no less than 3 different mid-priced waffle irons — that is, I wasted over $ 100 on junk — before I decided it was time to get serious about the value of my product.
I have a theory that teams who are forced to pick with less value do better in later rounds because they get good at it through practice and more focus on finding late round gems and diamonds in the rough — whereas teams with lots of high value picks naturally focus on the early round players where it's harder to whiff.
According to ESPN's Jerry Crasnick, the deal also includes some no - trade protection for Cain and «significant» award bonuses, the latter of which probably helped soften the blow of Cain getting a bit less than he'd hoped for as far as the total contract value.
As I said the other day, Liverpool lose their two best players in recent years, and bring in # 210 million, we're losing our best two players, and only getting a Utd reject in return, who's been poor in the Premier League, and valued at less than # 30 million.
Formal contract negotiations took less than an hour, whereupon Jones signed for only $ 350,000 — less than market value — because he wanted to get his career started immediately.
From youngsters like Neymar and Harry Kane to less expensive veterans like Zlatan, Man United can land the high - quality player they want while getting a lot more value for their transfer fee.
Essentially, divisional games level the playing field and boost the value of teams getting plus money since they can win less than 50 % of their games and still be profitable.
Everyone gets paid less than their actual value, salary cap or not.
We haven't lost team value in the last two years, we haven't gotten weaker in the last two seasons, we haven't finished further down the table in the last two seasons, we haven't replaced players with worse players in the last two seasons, we haven't gotten more injuries than usual, we haven't been kicked out of the CL any earlier than usual, and we haven't spent less than usual but we have won two FA cups.
Additionally, its a lot less likely that a running back would get their 5th year option compared to other positions, which also diminishes the value of drafting one in the first.
we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game
I seem to agree that Kawhi's not about the money, that he'd work his ass off in practice and in a game to win for his team... and i doubt Kawhi wants all this attention on him now... but given all these leaks from former players and media sources about leaving SA, getting more money and getting into a bigger media market / shoe deal, that's not Kawhi at all... it has to be something / someone... looking at his camp... logically SAS wouldn't be leaking these unless they are nudging him to leave, and for what, for inevitably way lesser value in whatever trade they get into.
which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course
maybe you don't understand that Wenger's words are simply an attempt to recover some of the market value that was lost due to the way they have mishandled his contract negotiations, which means that everyone, once again, knows that we have little to no leverage when it comes to negotiating a transfer... much like we did with RVP, when we sold the EPL trophy to ManU for less than $ 25 million... any reputable team with a sporting director would never have allowed this situation to occur again and if they had heads would roll... if handled correctly the worst case scenario would have seen us get a minimum of $ 65 million for a player of his ilk in the present economic climate and we could have used those funds to purchase the best available striker in the early days of the transfer window... just imagine what outsiders must think about the state of our team if all you did was read the headlines... sadly, things might just might be worse than they think
Of course, in the back of my mind, I've got this theory that they won't bench Pekka because a backup goalie has less trade value than a starting goalie.
Of course, that skill isn't highly valued anymore so you get less and less skilled 5s who can actually take advantage of smaller guys.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z